You could easily just lean on the hitchens razor. What is posted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Hate and wishing death are in fact dissenting opinions. You may not like it, but it's true. Lies in an echo chamber will never be debunked and will only get stronger, but lies in the open will easily be debunked and disproven.

I'm sure there's plenty of people that you hate because it's a human emotion. I'm sure there may be people that you wish would no longer exist. I know one in particular that a lot of people would agree should just go away.

That's exactly my first reaction. He's such a narcissist piece of shit.

No. I believe that the ability to hear disenting voices is important to either challenge or strengthen your own opinions.

Tribal is the word of the day and it's the one that matters in this context. Still very relative to modern human relations.

If you can explain to me how a man can be pregnant then maybe I'll change my mind but it seems rather unscientific to me. And this is talking about biological sex not gender.

Maybe do better with your argumentation instead of just calling somebody a bigot because you disagree.

To be more clear the vast majority of people do not want to change their language for vanishingly small minority. FTM is an even smaller minority than MTF and that's what's required in order for a "pregnant man".

It's called human nature.

What? A suicide/lynched corpse? What could possibly be offensive about that? Politics has made you insane.

Edit: People can and do change who they are when confronted by real empathetic people. Living people do. Dead people never change.

Only rapists.

It's kind of silly to give a pass to the literal "rape and pillage" civilization.

All because Elon thinks yellow caution paint isn't aesthetic enough for his god damn factory.

The claim is direct funding from RFK Jr. And a deliberate end goal of the study for his purposes. Not that the study is good or bad but that it is a nefarious plot by RFK Jr.

My mistake I thought it was a reply in the other comment thread.

The thing that makes it possibly a good study is that it was published in a good journal from a good school. It's not Harry Wang's Big Book of Science. You expect poorly done research in pay to play journals, but less so in biomedcentral.

I'm still mildly skeptical and have seen people make the claim that it was more likely the age of the mother which has been legitimately associated with higher risks of autism. It makes sense. But having now seen that they're pushing this shit super hard I'm immediately on guard.

I hadn't seen the Trump TV announcement of this dumb shit. This is something worthy of further study not a doctor's recommendation.