To be fair, that should have happened a long time ago. Copyright law hasn't been fit for purpose for a long time.

Damn I can actually see that. Robbie is way better looking but there's something in the features.

'Dammit genie you get back in that bottle right now!'

Apart from getting tasks done faster.

Ultimately the litmus being AI or not is stupid. The test is the same test weve always had. Is it good.

If its bad, rate it shit and move on.

You can make good shit with AI if you actually review what its done, understand it and tweak it. Its a force multiplier not a replacement for your own lack of skill.

Regressive thinking that protects only your faulty take.

You are indeed looking at symptoms and not the patterns that cause them. You can believe billionaires are a curse that shouldn't exist and still look at the situation rationally. You dont have to pick one.

I mean it is a skill, just not an enormously valuable one.

Its a bit like knowing how to use Microsoft Office. Good to have but not the basis for a hire.

Complicated multi-variable problems were never easy to Google.

Possible, if you were prepared to put some time in, but still not easy.

That you can explain several paragraphs of the details of a problem as a prompt and get a decent answer is a definitive upgrade.

I see the argument it will reduce peoples research abilities, but thats an education problem.

Horrible text colour choice tbf

How fucking big are your geese?

Nothing near me is anywhere near that hardcore.

Yes its too long, dont worry.

Definitely not a new thing, unknown men have always been a potential danger that warrant a bit of testing before engaging with.

Even the manosphere community figured this out and called it a shit-test, one of the few kernels of truth in their backwards worldview.