Vapor World: Over The Mind is a Soulslike Metroidvania with an evocative, painterly art style reminiscent of Lies of P and the narrative platformers of Playdead. According to Korean studio Alive Inc, the game had 100,000 wishlists just before its early access launch on August 19, mostly on the strength of a demo available since January 2025.

But what should have been a triumphant early access launch went pear shaped very quickly. At launch, few talked about the quite distinctive worldbuilding or the parry-heavy combat. Instead, all focus was trained entirely on something absent from the popular demo: very obvious AI use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (11 children)

Look this is simple: There is no legitimate need to use AI to do anything, let alone anything you take seriously and/or you'd want to charge money for.

So if you're not just being a paid shill then why kill your reputation by attaching your name and company to ANY amount of sloppy shit?

Just don't do it.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Apart from getting tasks done faster.

    Ultimately the litmus being AI or not is stupid. The test is the same test weve always had. Is it good.

    If its bad, rate it shit and move on.

    You can make good shit with AI if you actually review what its done, understand it and tweak it. Its a force multiplier not a replacement for your own lack of skill.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    at the very least don't use it for the the most visibly apparent components of a game. Having it stub out scaffolding for underlying systems in the code is one thing, using it for visual assets is just dumb

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    It is NOT fine as a "search engine". If you even read AI summaries you're dumber this year than you were last year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It sucks as a search engine. When I'm searching for something, I want factual, correct results, not a hallucinated answer which is backed up by none of its sources.

    When I click through search results, I'm reading, evaluating the sources, and synthesizing the information into something which I am reasonably satisfied is true enough. I don't feel comfortable handing that cognitive task off to a machine. The machine's job is to help me find the sources, not tell me what the truth is.

    Having a machine that tells you what is true is the most dystopian shit ever, and it would've sounded completely insane only 5 years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    It takes work to turn them into useful search engines. Set up librewolf. Drop in at least a search and a fetch agent. Wrap it in a some prompts to make sure you get actual links.

    On my extremely non-scientific scale I'd rate that setup somewhere between barebones Kagi and pre-enshitified Google in terms of results.

    I'm hopeful that an actual agent framework will do a better job that's significantly more work. If you just log onto a SaaS LLM you'll get very unpredictable search results.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)