[–] 1 point 8 hours ago

Yeah the "in a perfect world" medical solution would be for emergency caregivers to have rapid access to "apparent sex at birth" and "current hormone levels and when they were started," but everyone here knows a lot of evil people (especially in the US in 2026) would love to have a government record of transgender people for nefarious purposes, so that's probably unwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago (2 children)

    Gender and sex used to mean the same thing

    Unrelated, but if you really want to open this new discussion: I disagree

    it’s not like massive amounts of people are out there raising their kids non binary until the kids can choose for themselves, so whatever sex someone is assigned denotes the gender they’ve been assigned too.

    I think you misread my comment, because I wasn't talking about cis-het-normative spaces.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (8 children)

    Which is why we need to put M/W/N/(etc.) on driver's licenses while medical professionals have access to M/F/I/(etc.)

    Even from the ostensible purpose of M/F on a driver's license of efficient identification, it's lacking. Then there's the medical downsides you state - I'm sure you're aware many medical professionals check IDs rather than sequencing someone's sex chromosomes before performing emergency or other care.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

    I expect hormones-at-birth have effects on medical care as do hormones-at-present, and I'd bet anything transgender people (or anyone that has a difference between hormones-at-birth and hormones-at-present, including cis menopausal women for example) have adverse medical outcomes due to that confusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 10 hours ago*

    The lion's share of your comment is essentially the long form of the mantra I stated I believed in, but I appreciate you explaining it for people who don't know.

    To the last paragraph, that's probably the root of the confusion here; maybe one day we'll have a term for that intersection - something more concise than "sex/gender." Or is that what we're taking part in here? Using "gender" to cover both? A bit confusing to me, but maybe not so much to future generations.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 11 hours ago*

    This wouldn't be nearly as big of a problem if mental healthcare was more accessible.

    How many of these kids know their family or school can't afford a therapist, so they go to free LLMs?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

    I would agree that people are generally assigned "sex" and "gender" at birth, I just don't understand why it seems they're conflated among queer spaces when discussing "Assigned Male At Birth"+"Assigned Gender At Birth" when I feel like it should be:

    "Assigned Gender At Birth"→"Assigned Boy At Birth" and/or "Assigned Sex At Birth"→"Assigned Male At Birth."

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›