you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 12 hours ago (12 children)

The thing that impacts care more than sex is the hormones in the blood. If care is based on gender assignment rather than the hormones in their body, it can be equally disastrous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 child)

    You're kinda right, but unless you're on a gender affirming therapy (like HRT), then those hormones are going to be linked to your sex assigned at birth.

    (Though there are plenty of non-hormonal sex-linked differences in drug interactions as well)

    And if you are, that's a whole other layer of complication that your medical caregiver would also need to account for when prescribing you certain drugs/medical products.

    Edit: Added bracket part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago

    Yeah the "in a perfect world" medical solution would be for emergency caregivers to have rapid access to "apparent sex at birth" and "current hormone levels and when they were started," but everyone here knows a lot of evil people (especially in the US in 2026) would love to have a government record of transgender people for nefarious purposes, so that's probably unwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

    I expect hormones-at-birth have effects on medical care as do hormones-at-present, and I'd bet anything transgender people (or anyone that has a difference between hormones-at-birth and hormones-at-present, including cis menopausal women for example) have adverse medical outcomes due to that confusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

    Babies don't have hormones like that, holy fuck what is the education like where you are. Puberty! What's puberty! Think McFly Think!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 hours ago

    No need to be insulting towards them, especially when they weren't insulting you.

    Also, you're technically wrong. There definitely are hormones flying about your body even before you're born. All fetuses start as female, and its literally testosterone that causes differentiates towards male (or intersex in some cases). The only reason you don't start puberty as an infant is because those levels normally diminish within the first year after birth, returning again just before puberty begins.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    Sex chromosomes at birth, then?

    Are you being pedantic and adding ad hominem just to pick a fight?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

    I'm sorry buddy that's really not a thing. At all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    Yes, it is. As an example, trans women have an increased risk of breast cancer over cis males. The risk is not as high as cis women, but there is a statistically significant increase in risk amongst that demographic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

    The risk is simply from having developed breast tissue, you can spot check that one by just looking and seeing if they have breast tissue

    Gynecomastia can also progress to male breast cancer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 hours ago

    Yes, and the breast development is stimulated by HRT.

    I'm a data analyst for a research facility doing genetic analyses on rare variants of cancer. My PI specializes in breast cancer. We regularly have discussions about the research we're involved in.

    I know breast cancer still develops in cis men.

  • source
  • parent