[–] 3 points 1 month ago

Turns out I need to eat my words a little bit here. Airbus does have a plane that uses computer vision to take off and land, and taxi on the ground. And there's systems to visually detect other planes in the sky to help with collision avoidance. But they're not in passenger airliners yet because when the regulations were written decades ago, neural networks weren't big yet so it apparently says that every line of code needs to be directly traced back to a requirement, which is hard to do with weights. This is being revamped as far as I can tell, but not just yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Well that was also discussed, the person who suggested not having an AI disclosure was against it being used for advertising, but was also open to having a general one that didn't allow the company/model. Not sure that discussion has concluded yet btw.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Not every plane carries people of course. And neural networks aren't all like LLMs. They can be entirely deterministic and can be trained in tons of simulated environments. There's no reason it's inherently worse than any other algorithm.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›