while I would agree for this particular crime, in general death sentence is very problematic. I have read somewhere that during certain periods as high as 1/20 death sentences can be wrongfully given. So I am ok if they live like monks in some tiny cell for the rest of their lives while wrongfully accused people at least get some chance for getting out and compensation (which is not ideal but way better than death I would assume).

wow, I don't think people like this can be repaired. They should be locked away for life (with minimal comforts, basically a monk like life) and that energy should be spent on their kids and younger generation. Except ofcourse we are talking about the Trump administration, Trump probably thinks she got what she deserved. So yeah, quite hopeless.

it is the human condition to default assume others are kind of like you

Is it? I generally would assume it is a higher chance they would not be interested (conditional on that person being someone I don't know).

But in any case I think it is mostly because I can't explain complex stuff very easily to someone not acquainted with the topic so I find it useless to try. And I don't suspect I am neurodivergent, atleast largely.

If you are asking why mph in particular, it is probably because the news source is British so they likely converted it

It is not just about curviness though, chance of death for a hit pedestrian sharply increases after 40mph and is practically 100% at above 60mph. To be fair it is also quite high at 50mph so this is not just an issue of "if he went with 50 they certainly wouldn't die" (though they would have had better chance for sure). But this is to say, when they put these limits, they don't just pull them out of their asses to torture drivers.

it is mph, as stated in the articles

Trips? I see no such thing, he just jolted back after seeing the police that is all.

fucking parasites and parasite enablers

I think this case alone already nullifies your argument. Rules like this exist for exactly this reason, not for people to say "that is fine I am a good driver so I can go faster than the rules". I have been driving for quite a while too (10 years or so) and the fact that you can't see a difference between 80km/h and 120km/h just means you have gotten too comfortable. 90? Quite possibly, 100 ok fine but at 120 you should already be feeling off unless you are on a highway. On top of this, attention and reflexes only wane with age, so unless situations like this are harshly punished people will keep causing accidents just like this.

Indeed, he killed while going %150 over the speed limit. That should be considered reckless/gross negligence manslaughter and shouldn't be punished with just community service. It should be punished with jail time and they should make public service announcements out of events like this so people don't act like idiots.

I suppose if the offender was an immigrant, they would make him bleed out of his ass.

Why do we need to talk about things we are passionate about to someone who is not interested in it? That makes no sense to me.

I mean enshittification doesn't just affect software and internet. It works the same way: create demand for a product by making it high quality, once everything is structured around that product so that it can not be easily removed from society, enshittify it by significantly reducing quality while keeping most of the profit because now everything is shaped around your product.