Anyone know what changed circa 2010?
post
Has there been any recent effort whatsoever by a regulator or government policymaker in reigning in the size of these trucks? It's truly absurd
Was curious if we’d improved:
- 2022: 7,508
- 2023: 7,318
- 2024: 7,248
- 2025: 3,024 (Jan - Jun, full year forthcoming)
When maga hates on roundabouts.
I don't hate them but I have almost no experience with them and never one with pedestrians trying to cross it.
Are you supposed to not enter the roundabout if you see a ped going to cross the road where you would exit? Or stop in the middle if they step into your exit road? Or keep going around and around until your exit is clear?
As a pedestrian, can you walk counter to the spin? Can you cross the circle ⭕ or do you have to go around?
I'm not stupid but I am ignorant and I hope I'll soon have more opportunities to use the information you're about to impart.
Are you supposed to not enter the roundabout if you see a ped going to cross the road where you would exit? Or stop in the middle if they step into your exit road? Or keep going around and around until your exit is clear?
You stop and wait for pedestrians to pass, then exit or enter the traffic circle
As a pedestrian, can you walk counter to the spin? Can you cross the circle ⭕ or do you have to go around?
Yep. For you it's just a walkway that goes all way around the traffic circle, with no extra rules. Though sometimes there's just a bypass line for pedestrians, if there's 1 or more exits to highway or something where pedestrians do not go
You enter the roundabout normally.
If the pedestrian is crossing your exit, you wait by your exit until they are clear.
Most pedestrians will try crossing when they are sure nobody is about to enter, but obviously that is never a guarantee, and pedestrians have right of way.
you shouldn't be navigating a roundabout at such a speed where you cannot stop, so coming to a gentle stop to let them pass shouldn't be an issue.
The only roundabout hereabouts replaced a 4 way stop in a residential area. Little thing, one lane. So if I stop to wait for a pedestrian, the person behind me who's planning on continuing around to another exit will have to stop too. Which, given that the whole point of a roundabout is not to stop, they will not be expecting. I will get honked at and/or rear-ended, depending what they're doing on their phone. I think I'll circle around until it's safe.
Appro of nothing, I just checked my country's data. The US has roughly three times the pedestrian death rate to that of Australia.
I don't know what that means. I have only been to the US once, and that was in the 90s. I was very surprised at how difficult it was to be a pedestrian there. Australia does love cars too, but it is also relatively easy to leave them at home for small errands. Not sure how much of a contributing factor that is?
This data is not beautiful; it's propaganda. There is no reason for the y axis to not start at 0.
Why have a big gap underneath the graph? It is totally normal to adjust the axis to fit the data. This isn't a conspiracy, it's standard math.
I’m not saying it’s a conspiracy like the guy you replied to, but it’s generally considered correct to include 0 on graphs like this to show proper scale. If I had submitted a paper with this graph in grad school, all of my reviewers would have kicked it back.
If you want to get technical, it's only standard math if there's a symbol indicating the scale doesn't start at 0. Data is used like this all the time to misrepresent reality and yes, it's considered "normal" to do things that way.
50% less fatalities is propaganda?
all 48 comments