Crossposted from https://lemmy.world/post/47968211

Tom Fishburne | marketoonist.com

Transcript

  1. A man sitting at his computer tells a woman A.I. TURNS THIS SINGLE BULLET POINT INTO A LONG EMAIL I CAN PRETEND I WROTE.

  2. A woman sitting at her computer tells a man A.I. MAKES A SINGLE BULLET POINT OUT OF THIS LONG EMAIL I CAN PRETEND I READ.

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The fact that I have heard company executives talk about both of these activities unironically within the span of the same meeting damages my calm

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    It works best if you presume that nobody else exists on planet Earth who will use AI beside them.

    The Rich will have access to AI, the Poors will have to struggle along without, like an upgrade to how contracts, terms & licensing agreements do now.

    Case in point: self-hosters today must develop defenses against AI attacks, while websites such as Facebook/Insta/Threads and (fuck-)Reddit and X(hitter) work just fine and provide a "premium" connectivity experience, not so subtlety pushing people towards using the paid rather than free services.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago

    Emailing just the bullet point will get you on a PIP.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago
    31 comments in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 86 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    And they'll claim productivity was increased on both ends

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Reminds me of an economics joke about eating shit raising the GDP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The one chat goes something like this?

    Two economists are walking through a farm. One tells the other "hey if you eat some of that shit on the ground I'll give you $100". So the second guy does it, and the first one hands over the $100. A few minutes later they pass more shit, and the second guy says to the first guy "if you eat some of that shit I'll give you $100 too", so the second guy does it and gets his $100. After a while, the first guy says "wait, did we just eat shit for nothing? No one made any money" and the second guy replied "of course not, we added $200 to the GDP!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 54 points 5 months ago

    That'll be ten thousand dollars and your water supply please

    cash or card?

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    And the end bullet point is also wrong!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    It's like that game were you whisper into one persons ear and they pass in on. By the end the message is completely different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    The inverted compression algorithm

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    Management loves AI because management's job is to write emails and reports, not to actually communicate meaningful information.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Normalise terse and succinct communication and life will be less fucking stupid. The problem does not reside in the tool but in our garbage culture of waste.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    It's like file compression, but the other way round.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    The question is: the bullet point written and the bullet point read will differ.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    The truly hilarious thing in this scenario is that the bullet point he wrote and the bullet point she gets will be completely different. Their communication will be literally lost in translation.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    So is that what they call "garbage in, garbage out"?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    If a job can be done by AI it’s probably a bullshit job.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    David Graeber, rolling in his graever.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Decoder Encoder architecture

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I predicted this 6 years ago. It's automating corpo email ceremonies. Now all we need is to turn this into a chat app for this.

  • source