top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 32 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Well to be fair the X7 can seat 7 passengers while the Pz. II has only 3 seats.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

    So, on average, the tank carries more people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    X7 = 1.35 people/meter, tank = 0.62 people/meter

    ETA: not that I’m justifying the size or anything lol. Just mathing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    But the X7 will on average carry one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Persons carried on average has to be >1.0. Might be less then 1.5 which would make your statement true after rounding down but it cannot be 1 unless there are a lot of drivers that miss a leg or an arm and you are a biggot who sees them as less than 1 person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    So the BMW is a bigger target and far less armoured? Why would you ever drive the BMW!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago

    And by some miracle, I wouldn't be surprised if the Panzer II felt more spacious inside. It's baffling how cramped modern SUVs and especially crossovers are compared to their external size.

    Our relatively small VW ID.3 is more spacious inside than most small-to-mid crossovers in Europe (e.g. Renault Kadjar/Nissan Qashqai, Volvo XC40 etc.). It's still a lot smaller in external dimensions, and actually fits to parking spots.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    When you need to invade Poland at three but pick up the kids from pottery class at five.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Did you mean to do math better, or did you mean to state the size of the BMW owner?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    A 2012 Camry is longer than the tank too. So what? Weird metric to try to get a point across.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Pfft go back to the 1980s you can get a woody that was 5.48m long. (I.e. Ford LTD Crown Victoria Country Squire).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Before it even moves the front end has already reached the destination.

  • source
  • I wonder which has killed more people though...?

  • source