1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 5 months ago

Canada "I know! Let's hand absolutely everything our citizens do online, with their government ID attached, to Palantir!"

  • source
  • 44 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 20 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    what's worse is that gringos have their heads so far up in their asses that they dont even realize this kind of shit. and freak out when you try to propose something neutral.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Maybe I’m looking at it more from the infrastructure than the content, but how could you make it more neutral?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    well, here on lemmy for example when it comes to moderation we try to not follow the western narrative/norm when it comes to certain topics. i ban people constantly for expressing views that express normalized support for us imperialism, whereas in reddit you'd get that force-fed into your cerebellum even if you dont want to, in every community, all the time. generally this isn't so much an infrastructure issue, although it is, since us owned platforms push their view, they become mainstraim and the norm, and that way the Western Way is now the default. but rather how you engage as a community.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Okay so it’s more content, not infrastructure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    That's not what was said. More isn't better when it's just more noise, more CIA narrative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    To be fair, it wouldn't exist without DARPA.

    But we shouldn't be relying on some bullshit InterNIC crap either. DNS should be federated. Each country gets their cctld to manage and 'international law' 'forces' the varios nic orgs to cooperate. extra tlds are federated on a choice basis.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 19 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah more like people are starting to realize the internet is too American.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    the problem is, before all the politicians were on the same level. hell france and the uk just passed meta's age bill with ease. but now as trump is destroying everything, i as an american dont trust the system at all. before it was "the government doesnt care about you" now its "the government is out to destroy"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    people waking up to how a capitalist government actually functions and whose interest it serves is the one silver lining here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 5 months ago (23 children)

    It's so hard for me to read anything by Cory Doctorow or Ed Zitron these days because there's always this giant, gaping void where class analysis should be. Is this the time they finally connect the dots, I ask myself? No! It's never the time. It's always enshittification this and business idiots that and never, ever a single whisper about capital. Brian Merchant and Ed Ongweso Jr. are much better in this regard - if you haven't read anything by them I recommend you start.

    As to the actual content here, this is precisely what the internet was always created to be. Do you think the DoD sorry, DoW created this as a happy accident? Just to help people? It's always been intended as an anti-informational weapon and a surveillance network in-one. And all the attempts by vassal states to wriggle out of the trap will prove futile. China is the only country handling it the right way, and no capitalist nation will ever have the motivation to follow their example. There's too much money to be made in making their own little tech fiefdoms.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I don’t know what Doctorow’s politics are now, but I know he was deep in the dot-com libertarian milieu 30 years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago

    That doesn't surprise me. I think he's probably a socdem at best these days, specifically the kind of lib that thinks that we are in Bad Capitalism and if we just trust bust enough, we can go back to Good Capitalism, and all the smaller companies definitely won't just devour each other and repeal regulations, putting us in this exact position or worse in another 20-30 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I've found this also. He's a liberal with zero class analysis or materialist literacy. If you've ever read his books, like his main one, enshittification, it reads like a middle-school age baby leftist wrote it.

    It's a testament to the sad state of US and canadian education that he's considered a pioneer in any field.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    I've read his newsletter and that was enough.

    There's going to be a great need to properly educate the working class in the west before there's much hope of socialism gaining any traction. They keep people just educated enough to innoculate them against critical thinking. I forget the exact statistics, but a depressing number of people have not read a single book in their entire adult lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    National Security Hawks are our friends!

    What no class analysis does to a MFer.

    The National Security Hawks in the US are in on the surveillance, feeding the data to AI, and churning out lists of targets to eventually drone strike - domestically and abroad.

    Can someone connect me with these National Security Hawks that are for actual privacy and autonomy, instead of their own stupid surveillance states? Because I'm convinced Doctorow is making them up in hopes of inciting their existence.

    His pitch of "stealing American Trillions to keep Billions" is enticing and elegant, but flies in the face of All of the political Momentum. I wish to flee to his first country to destroy American Copyright in favor of their own national sovereignty! But not even France is taking this step in declaring "independence" from American Tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    He's Canadian, so he seems to be under the impression that the Canadian equivalents aren't working with the CIA (though they absolutely are). No vassal state is going to make such a move when they all know what happens to those that step out of line; the empire will have to be way more collapsed before the EU and Canada start testing their leashes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    National Security Hawks are our friends!

    What no class analysis does to a MFer.

    The National Security Hawks in the US are in on the surveillance, feeding the data to AI, and churning out lists of targets to eventually drone strike - domestically and abroad.

    Can someone connect me with these National Security Hawks that are for actual privacy and autonomy, instead of their own stupid surveillance states? Because I'm convinced Doctorow is making them up in hopes of inciting their existence.

    His pitch of "stealing American Trillions to keep Billions" is enticing and elegant, but flies in the face of All of the political Momentum. I wish to flee to his first country to destroy American Copyright in favor of their own national sovereignty! But not even France is taking this step.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Yes, the best book on this is Yasha Levine - Surveillance Valley . You can find the audiobook on torrents.

    The purpose the the very first DoD networks, was as an anti-communist counter-insurgency tool, mainly to aid in the collection of data and the fight against communists in SE asia, particularly Vietnam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    No, because it is not true. The Internet started as an idea for decentralized communications that the military could use in case of nuclear war. Then DARPA got the universities involved and it became a way to connect all the uni networks, which the unis used to share research when we were not being nuked.

    Edit: When the internet first started to appear, there just wasn't enough bandwidth to engage in surveillance, even after the uni's got involved. No one anticipated it exploding into everyone's household. Surveillance got tacked on later.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    There was an old episode of TrueAnon about the links between Epstein (and the CIA) to MIT that went over some of this stuff. I'm sure there's probably a book or article about it somewhere, but I don't have any better citation at the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    China is doing internet right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    They're sovereign.

    American tech companies. American national security organs cannot touch them, cannot put the hurt on them. They are independent and there is nothing Meta, Google, Oracle, etc can do to them. Look at Europe, look at the rest of the world on Facebook and Oracle products with a big gun right at their temple held in the CIA's hand if they do something the US doesn't like. China doesn't have that gun at its head and because of that China can be truly sovereign from the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago

    That's a single positive. Not "doing it right". What china has isn't even internet. Its intranet with some exceptions. Not to mention what the USA has also isn't truly internet but it's somewhat closer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    As someone who has lived in China for many years, including now, I have to say it's really not great for accessing the World Wide Web. Within China, the accessible internet is basically a Chinese national intranet. Which is not terrible if you are a native Chinese speaker, I guess. They censor because the US sending out massive propaganda. But China's government is producing a lot of domestic propaganda, too. Different goals - the US to destabilize and take over, China to stabilize and maintain support for the system.

    As I have lived here many years, I've put in a great deal of effort to learn the language. Unfortunately, with limited results. Learning to read and write in Chinese requires a structured learning environment and about 10 years of focus for most people. Due to illiteracy in Chinese I can't just switch to using the Chinese intranet. And the government keeps cracking down on VPNs. It can be very frustrating accessing the internet outside the GFW. And frankly there is a lot of useful and interesting content that exists outside the GFW.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    A lot of things have gone wrong since than

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Like, to find the canonical DNS name of one of my home lab IPs, 209.180.104.202, you search for a PTR record for 202.104.180.209.in-addr.arpa. (You get git.mspencer.net. Note my username here.) The first A in ARPA stands for something. (That’s how you know I’m not a bot - bots don’t have 25-year-old domain names. . . . I didn’t say I was interesting, I just said I’m not a bot. :-) )

    We don’t own it though. We never should - too much concentrated wealth and corruption. Like many technology stories, big wealth (whether Cold War military spending or giant corporations using money to squeeze out more money) creates something for one purpose, but people adapt and convert it for a better purpose. Business computing tech becomes home computing or gaming tech. Military redundant communications research becomes public redundant communication infrastructure.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    DNS is such a terrible thing, because, despite being amazing at what it does, and beautifully complex at times, it's still a massively centralized system that basically controls the internet. Of course it's based in the US.

    It's also the reason why domain names cost significant money, and they even sell TLDs for insane prices that only megacorporations can afford. They can decide what TLDs get to exist, and ultimately, they have the power to ban domains, whole zones, or even TLDs. They essentially have the power to dismantle the internet as most people know it.

    There are some alternative projects that aim to replace ICANN's root servers, but almost nobody has them set up (and the alternative root servers aren't even considered "legal" or part of the DNS system by any provider). Which leads to the alternative TLDs being almost useless. It's still a fun thing to set up, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    Become? It's always been...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Hey, you haven't seen runet yet. The most ham-fisted, suppressive idiot policies ever. It is as if they deliberately trying to draw out the torches and pitchforks.

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/boycottus@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 42 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Anyone who doubts this should look up where TCP/IP (the foundation of the internet) was developed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Sure but that doesn't mean the internet has to be American. But every country has allowed America to control everything thinking nothing well change. I don't get how stupid countries where allowing America to control all tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Presumably written before it became completely clear that Canada's government is on the wrong side of that fight, as seen in the news today:

    "The legislative proposal continues to grant the government discretion to issue broad orders in secret compelling our most secure digital communication tools to bypass, circumvent or weaken critical security protocols to facilitate surveillance. Bill C-22, if passed as is, is a blank check for the government to force its surveillance objectives onto service providers at cost to the privacy and cybersecurity of everyone in Canada."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The Government of Canada does not respect your rights as a human, in turn, I do not respect their authority to govern my use of technology.

    Move to an encrypted email provider that does not have servers in Canada. Set up an account with a VPN that does not have servers in Canada. Plan ahead for a way to pay for these services that do no use Canadian currency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Encrypted email is the most pokiness thing. Send an email to anyone not on their server and it is plaintext and anyone can read it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Alice and Bob both use encrypted email -> communication is safe.

    Alice uses encrypted email, Bob is in a country over which Alice's adversary has no jurisdiction and Bob uses a regular email service -> communication is safe.

    Alice uses encrypted email, Bob uses regular email but Alice's adversary has no idea that Alice talks with Bob because she is the only one being watched -> communication is safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Significant email metadata and routing information cannot be encrypted. All the typical email tools a user might try to use will work against their attempts to remain secure. It's a typical situation when security is retrofitted to an insecure interface. There are use cases for encrypted email but in 2026 it's hard to find one that isn't better served some other way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    That is why I am moving to self hosting as much as I can, I sail the high sees for media that is not Canadian or locked behind a pay wall that goes to fund US corps.

    I use a two pihole setup to block ads on regular internet (with wireguard to VPN into my LAN on the rare occasion I leave my LAN) and I use unwatched to watch youtube on my ios devices, I plan on moving to another thing once my firewall is setup (with openwrt). I use Home Assistant and Homebridge to get away from sending my data out, as much as I can. I stopped using US based social media to move to the open standards, I moved my domains to Canadian hosts. The fall back DNS for my pihole unbound is CIRA.

    The only US service I am paying for on the series of tubes is Claude, because it is helping me get my home lab working better, I will soon be stopping that. I want to get a used laptop from my local university to run Ollama, I want to get a used laptop to install Debian on to replace my iPad, I want to get a new phone to install a open source phone OS, but money. What I would really like to get would be a raspberry pi phone and tablet, but that would mean they would have to make one first!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Just a heads up that if you want to host full local models, you may want to try LM Studio or vMLX with models straight from hugging-face. Ollama is popular but they privilege their proprietary cloud MCP services and won’t even let you download web-enabled models unless you agree to use their API, which defeats your on-prem threat model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    Some of us who maintain healthy reading habits remember this sumbitch from 2005. Way before Snowden, there was Mark Klein. Frontline did an episode about this at the time. Didn’t faint any real traction until 2013 with Snowden.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Well... it did start as a US military research project...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment