An executive order signed by Donald Trump with little fanfare on Friday could have a huge impact on the health of US children, as it instructs the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to cut the number of recommended childhood vaccines almost in half.

The vague language of the order, which refers to “a scientific assessment that compared United States childhood immunization recommendations with those of peer nations” published in January by anti-vaccine activist Robert F Kennedy’s health and human services department, does not explicitly state that the new recommendation removes vaccines against seven diseases from the schedule.

The assessment, co-authored by the subsequently fired vaccine skeptic Dr Tracy Beth Høeg, concluded that the CDC director should update the childhood immunization schedule “to keep vaccines for 10 diseases – measles, mumps, rubella, polio, pertussis, tetanus, diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib), pneumococcal disease, and human papillomavirus (HPV) – for which peer, developed nations share international consensus, as well as varicella (chickenpox) … in the category of vaccines recommended for all children”.

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 5 months ago

I swear this is all to put satire out of business.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    My son's pediatrician hates RFK Jr with the fire of a thousand suns, and I love him for it.

    At multiple appointments I've intentionally made humorous references to stupid health/rfk stuff from the news. He stays totally professional, but he is also obviously relieved that he can safely roll his eyes and let off some steam about the level of stupid in the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago
    [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • 17 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 69 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Just in case anybody thinks "it's just a recommendation, that's not so bad," remember that the "recommendations" determine what insurers are willing to cover. No recommendation == pay full price out of pocket. On top of that, paying full price out of pocket leads to way fewer people getting it, which in turn leads to that price going up even more due to lack of economies of scale.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    luckily my state passed a law requiring the recommendations of the states office to be covered by insurance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Good luck with that. I just lost an argument with my HR because apparently they provide insurance under federal laws, not under the laws of my state

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    call your states attorney. they generally have an office specificall for health insurance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Implementing that recommendation would mean removing vaccines for these diseases from the recommended schedule:
    hepatitis A
    hepatitis B
    ....

    No one can live without a Liver, which is exactly what hepatitis attacks and kills. Tweakers will steal your catalytic converter off your car for $40. When a market exists with a $20,000 street value for a liver, and there's a liver in every jerk walking around in public, random kidnapping and organ theft is going to be a thing regular thing in about 20 years in the USA.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    There is no backyard surgeon way of transplanting a liver - these people will just die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    There's an international organ black market and plenty of people with medical training willing to participate in it if the pay is good enough, though.

    The people will likely still die, but misery profiteers probably WILL still step up organ theft as a result of this awful decision from the kakistocracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    There might be some heroic backyard surgeons who try, but mostly this is done in normal hospitals, it's just that no one is asking where the organ comes from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    It doesn't seem like it would be that hard to kill someone and take their liver, I'm not sure why we're acting like the black market organ trade gives a shit whether the people they steal organs from live or die. You could easily harvest a person for parts on a table the way you would a deer or any other animal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Anyone else initially read “halve” without the “L” and have a weird moment of trying to process a reasonable headline?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments