all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    On DDG is "Search Assist" the same thing as "Duck.ai?" Must confess that the former can be extremely useful sometimes, as long as I check its references.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    I think the most notable feature of ddg ai is that its not invasive, and as someone else has said here it can actually be useful. AI is like everything, you need to decide when it can actually add value. If i'm searching for some linux command, ai is brilliant. If i'm doing reasearch i may use ai asking for all references and then i go and check the references using search feature. Sometimes i just use search.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I would like to direct the reader to Yacy. It's a free-software, self-hosted search-engine. Users have the option to peer with other users, creating a larger decentralised search engine.

    Build it. Use it. Promote it. Finance it. Bupf it, for short. Build the future you want or piss and moan endlessly.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Neat. Reminds me of bitmagnet, which crawls BitTorrent's DHT to built a searchable index of torrents. It lacks a peer option though.

    I ran it for an hour and calculated that it would use over 1TB/month of bandwidth, which is too much for my data cap :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Ddg:

    Ran https://voteyesornoai.com/ Where of 175k people, 90% said No AI

    Offers noai.duckduckgo.com, presumably to cater to this 90% who don't want it.

    Has AI first features in main product. Does not advertise noai much.

    So...

    1. It's primary product goes against it's market research
    2. It's pushing AI, not promoting the alternative
    3. People keep promoting ddg for (2) despite (1)

    Just seems weird.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    Iirc, they explained it on techlore talks like "it"s X% of those who responded in $site, while many qactual users prefer or don't oppose it", or smth of that nature. Also, it appears far less than on google even with constant cookie clearing

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Additionally, people told me that DDG is in bed with Microsoft. If that's true, I guess Ecosia is hopefully better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    DDG is not in bed with microsoft. DDG uses Bing search index to show its search results alongside wikipedia and others they can.

    Ecosia also uses Bing alongside its own search index. Except Mojeek, Qwant there are very few Independent search engines which don't use Bing or Google as its search index.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 19 points 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    The problem isn't the LLM summary (easy to disable, what's the issue there?), but the SEO garbage in the results.

    I want to like DDG (and tend to use it for "easy" searches), but what's the point if search atrophies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Part of the problem is that most of these privacy-protecting search engines are just the big search engines re-packaged; DuckDuckGo is Bing, and Startpage is Google. SearchXNG is just an aggregator, and so is Kagi. What we really need are some alternative engines that function as well as Google used to. I would be willing to pay for that, as relying on ads clearly doesn't work.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Mojeek and Qwant both have independent indexes but afaik have no paid teir

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Unfortunately, neither is anywhere close to how good Google used to be, unless they've improved in leaps and bounds since I last tried them. I just want to be able to use boolean search terms again, and the fact that most modern search engines don't utilize them has me tearing my hair out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    DuckDuckGo=Bing is a misnomer - DDG uses a basket of search indexes excluding google, and I believe Bing's percentage keeps shrinking (last I checked it was 15%)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I only know about Google and Bing and perhaps yandex who have their own Search Index. What others does DDG use and can you share the 15% figure you shared? I find it hard to believe DDG has already reduced its bing dependence to such a number.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I’ve been using kagi for quite some time and still happy with it.

    Obviously not everyone will be willing to pay for search. But at least my data isn’t getting harvested.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago*

    +1

    kagi has the best search results for me, results are often more relevant than Google's results. DDG has awful results and I often end up using !g on DDG because I don't get any relevant results.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    I found Quant and DDG kinda sucky to be honest. I am experimenting with just having Tor open on my second screen with google. Might try Kagi at some point

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Ironic since DuckDuckGo has AI too

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Been pretty happy with Qwant for the past month now. I do not really miss google. I set it as default on all my devises so I wouldn't forget to use it. Now I prefer it. So nice to not having the entire screen filled with AI, sponsored irrelevant links and 99% SEO spam. I feel qwant has more nuanced results.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    DDG is almost all AI slop results now. Even worse than google.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    I use mostly EU search engines without AI (Startpage, Metager, Mojeek......)

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    It’d be great if DDG’s search was actually better rather than just an alternative. I’ve been using DDG for years and I’m still having to use other search engines because DDG’s results aren’t good or it pulls a google and gives you the same results no matter how many different ways you query.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    I switched because every time I tried to google something on my phone I got literally 10-15 captchas in a row and it was taking so long.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I think people just don’t want every search to have AI included, it’s too much for some. Even though it’s useful sometimes, they are forcing it for almost every query, which is too much.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago

    I don't mind Google. I've been using it to figure out how to build a home made mobility scooter, and it's working quite well.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/technology@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    If DuckDuckGo had better context recognition so when I search five terms I get results with all five in a somewhat correct order, I would never have to use any other search for any reason.

    Hopefully this new success enables those changes and they dont blow it on AI.

  • source