all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I don't like that they want to supplant the existing paradigm... Wikipedia is a human-generated information layer that teachers have always warned should not be cited directly (for one thing, it is continually being edited so what the reader sees is often different than what the person citing it saw). Google seems intent on making it more and more difficult to get past their interpretation of what the Web said down to the actual discourse occurring between different sources on the Web.

    The existence of such tools is not something I object to so much as the removal of the self-directed search option.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    So far I've been enjoying Kagi thanks to folks on Lemmy, for anyone looking for a good alternative.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Kagi was the best search engine I have used since back then, in the 90s, when Google was a new thing, so disruptive. If Kagi was not US-based, I would have very happily remained one of their paid customer, it's real good with many excellent features.

  • source
  • parent
  • 63 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    15 comments in c/degoogle@discuss.tchncs.de view that post
    11 comments in c/degoogle@lemmy.ml view that post
    6 comments in c/enshitification@slrpnk.net view that post
    3 comments in c/google@lemdro.id view that post