top 92 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 467 points 1 year ago (52 children)
  • [–] 210 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    I think this every single time I see news about that website. Like what the fuck is possibly on there that justifies using that piece of shit platform? Insanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This sketch was about Facebook but it's also relevant to Twitter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Non-fediverse social media is designed to be addictive because that's how the people running it make money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    What do you mean non-fediverse? How does Federation affect addictiveness?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    That's easy. It's more dull here, and there's less lock-in.

    No, really. Social media without the dopamine-pump-style algorithm behind it is far less stimulating. Meanwhile, the Federation model itself allows us to abandon nodes that are co-opted by bad actors. So there's always somewhere else to go with all your favorite stuff when things go sour.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Algorithmically curated timelines are designed to be addictive. Fediverse doesn't have that, it's time based, like it used to be before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh ok, sorry. I wasn't aware that the fediverse restricted algorithms

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • It does not restrict them per se, it's just that the mechanics of what to show you are either simply based on posting time, or amount of "interactions" or "interactions/time" or similar simple algorithms. It would be possible to analyze posts for specific content and show you for example ragebait only, but i doubt that pull request would be accepted - you would probably have to make a fork of your fediverse platform and implement it there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    You can mimic the feel of Twitter by taking reddit threads and cutting them at the most popular reply (Reddit already does this), and then reversing the order. Now the "best" content is front and center and the conversation / context is in the background. Users don't have to go through the tediousness of a discussion before experiencing the sheer joy of a witty response. The emotions come faster and more consistently.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Like what the fuck is possibly on there that justifies using that piece of shit platform?

    Tech news. Fast tech news. It's well centralized. Unfortunately nothing comes close (not reddit, nor HN, nor lemmy).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    There's just a lot less activity on the alternatives. Especially if you're trying to follow niche interests.

    Obviously, I left, but I get how barren it can feel when the latest post about a hobby of yours is 3 days old, instead of 3 minutes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I keep getting arguments from peoplee about this, even on Bluesky.

    Apparently it's too much to expect people to inconvenience themselves and not follow their favorite musicians or whatever.

    If the vast majority of people can't be assed to take the absolutely easiest step possible to fight (or avoid supporting) fascists/Nazis, then we really are fucked.

    Same thing with how people could very, very easily choose just NOT to buy another Nazicar. Yet 90% if Americans still bought one last month as a year earlier. It's just about the smallest sacrifice I can think of - just buying a DIFFERENT car that you might not like quite as much.

    And I think the fact that we are where we are right now also confirms the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Perhaps it's because I'm old, but I kinda hit a wall a few years back where I stopped giving a shit about what famous people had to say on the internet. So on that basis, the move from Twitter to Mastodon was easy for me. Less easy was leaving behind people who I liked, but life is change, and we leave people behind all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I ditched most of my friends when twitter and facebook came out. They all got too twitchy and really boring to be around. They were becoming more and more self conscious and self absorbed. It's some scary shit watching from a far

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yea I really don't understand this, like move it's 2 seconds to join bluesky...like damn

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Time or technical challenge are not the issue. The issue is that the utility of a social network is a function of the number of individuals in that network.

    That's why Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit all still have dominant positions in their regimes. If you want to see what your friends are saying you need to be on the same network they are on. And if they are on Twitter, signing up for Bluesky doesn't magically get you their content. I'm off twitter, never really used insta, I have my FB account, but I only log in now when I need to check on specific things (like seeing if people were OK after the wildfires swept through the town I used to live in), and I guiltily admit I still use reddit, largely because a lot of the niche subs I frequent aren't here. I know the solution to that last problem is for someone like me to step up and make them, but... I'm tired boss. I can either be a volunteer firefighter, or I can admin a firefighter com on Lemmy. I can't do both.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Naa I get it, I think I'm more annoyed at how the big guys (bands/nfl teams/companies/ect.) haven't moved. Because if they do, they're going to drag a ton of people with them and it'll kickoff the migration.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Are you saying 90% of Americans bought a Tesla last month?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nah, they're saying sales have only dropped by 10% from 2024, in the US. Which is fucked up.

    Wonder if that's because left aligned types had already quit buying them in '24? He was already being a total fuckhead during the election at that point.

    Hell of a way to squeeze a statistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah reading it again, they are saying year over year, last month (June) sales were down 10%.

    They phrased it very oddly. Like the kind of way you phrase things when you are trying to spin an agenda.

    None of that helps. The facts speak for themselves. We don’t need to embellish to make the point. That only invites challenge to our credibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I completely agree. Making statistics lie is a dark art.

    The fascist fuckheads and their followers are doing so much blatantly evil shit that there is no need to embellish anything. The plain facts are plenty apalling all by themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    People just don't want to quit because the alternatives aren't populated enough.... Which is caused by people not leaving. Twitter is to many a necessity for their business, just like many softwares provided by scum companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    bluesky is populated "enough".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I do think that bluesky has a ton of momentum right now and is a viable alternative. But the thing about microblogging sites is that if the specific people you want to follow aren't on them, there's not really a substitute. I know I've heard people say that, for example, a lot of japanese game developers are still primarily on twitter (I've never been a twitter/bsky enjoyer so I can't speak to it personally).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I feel like the common use cases are:

    1. you’re MAGA nut
    2. you’re not a MAGA nut, but you want to see what the loonies are talking about
    3. You’re a marketer or influencer and you know MAGA nuts also buy shit
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    For me, it's the best place for quick sports updates. Many writers have moved to bluesky, but many more have not. Sports Twitter is the sole reason I use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 131 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I’m immensely grateful to him for entrusting me with the responsibility of protecting free speech, turning the company around, and transforming X into the Everything App.

    Translation: I’m so thankful that I’ve had the opportunity to devote 2 years of my life to a company that was able to build a product that could appropriately express its true love for Adolf Hitler.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    There's no way that Elon let her have any actual autonomy to make decisions for the company. I'm not even convinced Elon didn't just tell her to say that.

    Also, assuming those are her own words, she didn't say that she did any of those things, just that she had the "responsibility" to do so. If that was really her responsibility, she epically failed at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You work for two years and extract enough money to last multiple lifetimes for you and your children. Then when you work up the courage to quit you put out this absolute tripe of a statement to show other billionaires you're a good little capitalist soldier. "Give me more millions, I'm a soulless greedy fuck like you and nothing is ever enough."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Shitting on your boss publicly when you’re a public figure sends a signal that you might shit on your future bosses.

    Despite your claim that she never needs to work again, she might still want too, just for a non-nazi aligned company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Taking this job in the first place should disqualify her from any position of authority at any company operating with a shred of morality. Actually disavowing the horrible shit should in fact be her only chance at a modicum of redemption and future employment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 96 points 1 year ago

    Yeah ... it's best to grab what money you can now and run ... because you won't be able to later

  • source
  • [–] 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Literally haven't heard anything that this person did as CEO in the two years since she joined.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sounds loke she found the line for being a fall guy that she wasn't willing to cross.

    Not that anyone really believed Elon isn't calling all the shots here.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 93 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    She was happy to take the bag even after Musk’s nazi salutes but now runs away. I wish I could say ”better later than never’ but she was a CEO, not some random nobody working at the ”basement’. Fuck these people!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I hear it's on the 2 year anniversary, meaning she probably waited for some stocks to vest or something like that. It also means her mind was made up before, but that she wanted to maximize her payout because it's never enough for these people. I hate CEOs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Taking the position himself would rob him of a layer of insulation from public opinion. He'll find himself another rubber stamp, if he can find someone who's sufficiently stupid, greedy, and/or desperate to take the job (and there always is someone). We should start a betting pool on how long that person is going to last before taking the fall for Musk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Why would he care? Who is going to do anything to him? Dude did Nazi salutes on stage, ain't shit happen but offense.

    Could he just perhaps pull a reverse card and go un-crazy? Do something useful instead of just making everything worse?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    if he can find someone who's sufficiently stupid, greedy, and/or desperate to take the job (and there always is someone)

    I'm not desperate, but if Musk offered me CEO money I'd do it. That amount of money to not have to do any work (just rubber stamp and tell an idiot he's a genius)? Where do I sign up?

    It's not like people blame Yaccarino for all the stuff that's been happening on X.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    She peaced out 3 months after 2 years. I wonder if she had shit that paid out on her anniversary.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well, according to one source:

    At X, her base salary was reportedly $6 million, according to Market Realist. In addition to this, she was eligible for up to $2 million in annual performance bonuses and received $4 million in stock options spread across a three-year term.

    So if she stuck around another year she'd have gotten another ~$1.3 million in stock options. Guess she figured it wasn't worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    She was a DEI hire anyway, right folks?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm not convinced she actually did anything as "CEO." I'm sure that Elon just told her what to do/say and she made it seem like they were her ideas. There's no way she had any ability to make any real changes or do any real work.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    X Pretend CEO Linda Yaccarino

  • source
  • [–] 107 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Media acting all surprised when “anti-Woke” means Hitler. That’s exactly what it means.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think she had a discussion with Musk about the AI and didn't like his answer. Escape before she is caught in the shit storm that is coming. Dunno. I don't make enough to speculate what a CEO would do.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    Twitter has been a nazi shithole since day 1 of the Musk era. At least now people cant say they didn't know anymore. If you stick there your either a nazi-bitch, or a nazi's bitch.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    7 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post