So only one perspective is allowed?? Why can’t their be multiple views?

Oh yeah, I remember the "the other side" at the Holocaust museum...

A prominent Israeli legal organization alleges the Canadian Museum for Human Rights is promoting a politically one-sided narrative.

So we should consider adding Nakba exhibits to Holocaust museums to avoid a one-sided narrative?

This is like one day a British lobbyist group wake up and starting to sue their ex-colonies for misrepresentation. The amount of delulu one must have to do this deserve to be studied.

a politically one-sided narrative.

Easy to fix, add a single sign 'nothing bad happened'. Big chance you can re-use the next time Israel is featured in an exhibition in your human rights museum.

Ah yes the other side.

Fueled by imperialist fervor, and backed by western military power, the settlers marched under a perceived promise from the God of the universe as recorded in a book written by men thousands of years ago that they would be the sole inhabitants of a specific piece of dirt that already had other people living in it. Under this banner of heaven the settlers felt justified in the violences documented in this exhibit because they wanted the land that other people had been living on for generations. The animosity toward their fellow man from settlers of the Israeli state continues to this day in much the same fashion: seizing land, beating inhabitants, turning a blind eye to rape and murder, enforcement of an apparteid status, and unceasing propaganda including the delegitimizing of the term "antisemite."

I personally don't understand why sharing that viewpoint would matter, but I guess, go ham.

Also

delegitimizing Jewish self-determination

No it doesn't. Jewish self-determination doesn't grant the right to murder, rape, and steal from people, and documenting the abuses of the settlers does not delegitimizing Jewish self-determination. This is true of all acts of self-determination, and to believe different because it's "Jewish" would be holding Jewish people to a double standard which, I'm sure you all know, the ADL considers antisemitic.

...how is The Onion still in business again?

I dunno, but if anyone comes across the embroidered Ass and Face towels they used to sell in the back of the print version, let me know

Maybe we can get a Smithsonian for this too.

Israel is literally going out of their way to make pograms look justified and Hitler not look crazy.

Netanyahu and his ilk will be the reason a second holocaust happens.

The one-sided narrative is what we were all fed for three quarters of a century. Now they're just furious that the other side of the story is becoming more widely known. If Israel hadn't so obviously decided on a policy of genocide towards Palestinians, it might have stood a better chance of continuing to control the narrative. But we've seen Israel committing the most appalling torture and mass slaughter every day for years and celebrating it, despite it also killing as many journalists as it can to prevent the truth being told. Our understanding of the story is rebalancing, and Israel's propagandists hate that.

The term antisemitic is really losing all meaning at this point. Which is fucked up.

Cancer is suing the chemotherapy museum, who would have thought.

So to be clear, this is an Israeli legal group, not a Canadian Jewish legal group. In fact it is a group that has well known ties to the Israeli government and Israeli intelligence, and whose founder has bragged that they can do what the government cannot do because of political restraints and international treaties.

This isn't about members of the public having any kind of legitimate grievance, this is about lawfare.

... is promoting a politically one-sided narrative

Oh really now? Are they really?

hey prominent legal organization, get absolutely f'd

archive link

The exhibit focuses on Palestinian accounts of the Nakba — Arabic for “catastrophe” — referring to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war surrounding the creation of the State of Israel.

“The creation of the State of Israel pursuant to international legal and diplomatic processes is not, in itself, a human rights violation,” the letter states.

Make it make sense, Israel shouldn't exist for the exact reason.

Hopes this goes to court and that there's a fruitful discovery phase, with relevant documents held by parties being potentially put into the public record. Ideally with governments being dragged into this, so that it extends to gov records.

Until they stop "genociding" they should keep their hypocritical mouths closed. Human rights indeed.