Media organizations typically don't want to post (only) to discussion groups, they want to provide a way to follow them as organizations.

That being said, @heiseonline@social.heise.de does sometimes mention threadiverse communities in its posts so they appear in those communities.

In a perfect world, all media organIationa would have their own instances (tied to their domains) for each network type (threadiverse, micro logging, video, short form video) and these instances would be used for both content distribution (official NYT mastadon feed) and for validation of journalists.

The non-profit foundations that manage these networks could provide managed services to raise more money for development (beyond donations).

What do you mean by verified? I'm not sure there's such a thing as "verification" on Lemmy, at least.

@mho @heiseBotti @fediverse Bluesky uses the AT protocol, not the ActivityPub protocol and I don't think Bluesky is connected in any way to the Fediverse. Threads, however, is connected to the Fediverse.

Bluesky doesn't count.

I don't see why a media organisation would use lemmy. Unless if it's via the wordpress or another integration.

@ProtonPrivacy@lemmy.world is quite likely the official org

@mho Since when is Threads part of the Fediverse? @heiseBotti @fediverse

@mho @fediverse netzpolitik.org is on Pixelfed at instapix.org/netzpolitik.org

@mho @heiseBotti @fediverseI kinda think there's 4 levels to media being here.1. having an account on some other server2. running your own server just for news feeds etc3. running your own server for staff4. posting native AP articles ala #ghost

@mho @heiseBotti @fediverse you can add ‪@novaramedia.com‬ on Bluesky (also bridged to Mastodon) - it’s an independent left wing media organisation from the UK

@mho the image preview looks like great advertising for Flipboard.@heiseBotti @fediverse