top 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 94 points 6 months ago (1 child)

Democrats have no intention of changing anything meaningful. We learned that when Obama had a supermajority and became a black Dubya, despite his extravagant progressive promises.

Our only power is local now, and they know this, which is why they swift-boated Mamdani and ran a Democratic partisan against him.

Yes, it will take a major disruption to necessitate any meaningful change at the national level.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago*

    Correct to answer OP, yes you can't vote your way out of fascism. So we will need a war to get out of this mess.

    Then to the Democrats the current Democratic Party is already right of Regan. It's that racket effect. Fuck up part if things keep going as business as usual. Then your next major Democratic candidates will be no different then Trump.

    But all that moot. Again we can't vote our way out of this nightmare. And before 2030 we will all be living in hell run by oligarchy tecno bros. With all the AI data center sucking up all our water and they rounded up as much of the population that they can. Then it over.

    You think North Korea is bad wait until we are living in just that type of world in America were statues of Trump liter the country and anybody that doesn't worship him is locked in a work camp.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Is reforms from Democrats enough?

    "They’ve got a set of Republican waiters on one side and a set of Democratic waiters on the other side, but no matter which set of waiters brings you the dish, the legislative grub is all prepared in the same Wall Street kitchen"

    Huey Long, campaign speech for the re-election of Senator Hattie Caraway (D-AR), 1932

    Am I the only one that believe the US has to go through some sort of painful transition/civil war/revolution to fix it?

    No, you aren't. I'm sorry you have to go through this hard way

    Sorry if my english is bad

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago

    "I, John Brown, am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land can never be purged away but with blood. I had, as I now think, vainly flattered myself that without very much bloodshed, it might be done."

    • John Brown
  • source
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I am quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood. I had, as I know think vainly, flattered myself that without very much bloodshed it might be done.

    • John Brown
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    Never forget- John Brown is the first American hung for treason. The Confederate leaders got minimal incarceration (if any), pardoned, or just walked back into society like nothing happened. Then they built statutes, named schools, and carved a mountainside with their images. Our only consolation is that Stonewall got shot by his own troops and died in agony a few days later after having his arm sawn off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago

    Nothing will change until we group together and stop exploitation. This includes how America has propagandize that all violence is equal. Nothing is going to change unless some bricks go through some windows and I think we are past even that. Not a single person in power is on our side.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    If reforms from democrats was enough, we wouldn't have Trump right now.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    The founding myth of your nation is violence. I think it's like asking if there will be snow in February (I'm Canadian btw)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    What's the founding myth of Canada if not Eurocentric settler colonialism intended to displace and exterminate the indigenous peoples of the land they were invading?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    Revolution is necessary, because the bourgeois state cannot be dismantled and a proletarian state put in place via peaceful means.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    If they thought we could vote our way into socialism, they wouldn't let us vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    Hence the supreme court decision and the mad rush to gerrymander the fuck out of every state they can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    The DNC isn't socialist though, it's just two factions of capitalists duking it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago* (6 children)

    While that's true, I do think that neither of those camps is willing to so much as slide back into a welfare state (even with extra imperialism on the side). The DNC doesn't want any more Mamdanis (even though he's a socdem at best), and if they think this'll prevent that, they'll let it happen, no matter how much they claim to oppose it. If there were any possibility of an actual socialist being elected, we'd see way worse than this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Agreed! I actually think the current factional war within the DNC might make room for a third party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I think you may be right. I just hope we can get them to move left instead of right. Nate Bear's recent post really gave me pause, because I know a lot of people who want to maintain their treats above all else. I want to have some faith in humanity, but we're definitely going to have our work cut out for us, I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I won't hold out for the DNC moving left. Entryism doesn't seem to be a valid approach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago
    [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    I highly recommend you read Blueprint for a Revolution by Sroja Popovic. Dude was involved in the Serbian revolution and has advised movements around the world on what works against fascist regimes and what doesn't. Our hope isn't in a party, it's in the people. And violence not only isn't required for a Revolution, it's not anywhere near as effective as non-violent resistance.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    It’s a class war, now combined with AI sucking up the most basic of living resources, from us to the billionaires’ latest pet project.

    Everything else is a distraction. Remember, up to 50% (depending on what study you read) of social media is bots.

  • source
  • [+] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Anything else on your wish list? Just curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago

    I guess that you have to live outside the US to see what a scary man-baby it is. If a country has all the power in the world, and then decides that rules don't apply to them, it quite a short step to wishing that they would fail and leave the rest of us alone. The delusion is that they have adopted the world cop role. The reality is that they are the world bully.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    There won't be real reforms from Democrats because they're complicit and invested in the system staying exactly as it is. Just "nicer."

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Noooooooooo! STOP SAYING THIS! YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE THE REPUBLICANS WIN!!!!

    STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP! THIS IS WHY KAMALA LOST!

    SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP!

    I have traced your IP Address and confirmed you are a Russian Bot! MODS! MODS! BAN THIS ACCOUNT!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    You must be bad at tracing IP addresses because I'm not a Russian bot. And the Democrats have ALREADY made the Republicans win, in case you haven't noticed. I'm pointing out that political parties are a corruption of our politics and should not have direct electoral access. They should be like any other special interest group.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    I honestly can't tell if you're joking but Kamala lost because her policies were fascism light instead of anything representing the working class. If the Dems want working people's vote they have to do something for them, not just say "I'm not Trump".

    I voted blue but completely get why people wouldn't, lessor of two evils is still evil. If the only thing a system has to offer is evil then it's time for that system to collapse, simple as that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Kamala lost because her policies were fascism light

    Okay, but that's better than fascism, right? So stop criticizing fascism lite! It's only hurting the opponents of fascism!

    Well... okay, maybe the police and prosecutors that Kamala Harris organized during her time as California AG hurt the opponents of fascism a bit more. But that was before we had a dang Cheeto in the White House. So, let bygones be bygones and focus on the future.

    I voted blue but completely get why people wouldn’t

    I will be very angry at you anyway. If you upset even a single independent voter on the fence about voting for Kamala, you have committed Word Crime against the cause of the Stopping Trump.

    lessor of two evils is still evil

    That's exactly what a Russian would say. I've outed you as a nefarious FSB superagent here to bring down American Democracy and turn us into a nightmare hellscape of Soviet Style Communism, which is what Russia is right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I agree with you, the Democrats aren't going to reform anything, even if they wanted to (and they don't).

    A financial collapse seems inevitable at this point, Balkanization may be a very good thing. There's no need for a civil war, we're nicely divided already and have functioning state governments that will quickly replace the Federals. That's best case scenario.

    Worst case scenario? Civil War II, but really, "The South" has even less of a chance of winning now. This seems unlikely. Best to just cut them off and stop propping up their miserable states, within a generation or two they will learn that they need us (coastal cities) far more than we need them.

    Jesus isn't going to come save the day, no matter what The Christian Broadcasting Network says.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I too thought collapse was imminent until I learned about stablecoins. When nobody is left to purchase the debt... What happens?

    This is where stablecoins come in. They are taking dollars, buying debt, keeping the interest as profit and issuing digital dollars.

    It's a cycle that can continue as long as the US government can pay for the interest..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Oh, sweet summer child. The Democrats don't even have an interest in reforming the system, which is why nothing changes even when they have a majority in congress. Reformism is dead. Only a revolution can save the working class from the stranglehold of capital.

    Now, is a revolution in the US forthcoming? Unless conditions change dramatically, I would say not. But we have entered the weeks where decades happen and left the decades where weeks happen. If you want to be prepared, organize and read theory; having a reality-based perspective will help you regardless of where we're headed.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    If revolution happens right now, it's going to be oops! All reactionaries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Not today, not next year. I'm uncertain about the mid-to-long range projection, like 5-10 years or beyond. I think either people will wake up and revolution will be a real possibility as our living conditions deteriorate, or we'll be completely enclosed by the panopticon and the Jakarta method will come home. It all boils down to socialism or barbarism, at the end of the day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago

    The degree of the chaos between current governmental state and a better government is the concern i always wonder about. One thing we know is that the rich dont want it to fundamentally change. Even the dems. When biden was comforting a group of megawealthy donors and assuring them that 'nothing would fundamentally change' with him in charge, he was speaking for the party. And they havent budged from there. They are not friends of the common people but they are somewhat closer to us than the gop.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I mean, we basically have, in my opinion, the choice of a civil war, some sort of revolution, or complete and total economic collapse, and rebuilding after the collapse to fix America.

    I don't see any other way than that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago

    I would vote for a candidate that begins the process of devolving the Union so we can eventually divorce into separate countries. I think we are doomed for civil war either way. As a Californian, when they're doing stuff like systematically disenfranchising us, withholding our Medicaid dollars and attacking our public universities despite us contributing more to the treasury than we take back, it's hard to feel like an American. I'd prefer to be a citizen of California than share a country with these freaks. Winning elections won't make me feel any better after seeing how they despise and want to destroy us.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    As things stand, unfortunately, the far-right is significantly better armed and better prepared for a breakdown in government.

    While I would prefer to peacefully reform the system, it's increasingly clear that there's validity to the saying, "If you want peace, prepare for war." The fact that the right is better positioned for a breakdown in order allows them to push further and further without fear. Civil war or revolution isn't going to be something the left chooses, rather, if current trends continue (and it seems like they will) we may end up in a situation where it's forced upon us and we are left but no choice to defend ourselves.

    It's not necessarily an all-or-nothing deal. There are methods of fighting back that are more effective than relying on the Democrats but don't constitute full-on revolution, such as strikes. While strikes are non-violent, history has shown that they have potential to become violent, for example, if a boss hires mercenaries to force people back to work at gunpoint.

    Likewise, if masked gunmen started showing up to people's workplaces, demanding some of the workers to be handed over to be taken as hostages, workers need to be prepared to deal with that emergency.

    Practically speaking, even if you wanted a revolution, there's now way that would even be viable while practical steps for community defense have not been made. I'm not sure it's rhetorically necessary to go further than that, particularly on a public forum.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I'm only quibbling with the right is better prepared.

    The core issue for them is they are building their preparedness around "rugged individualism" and we prepare with resilient communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Great point I don't see made enough. The right in the US is better armed, but preparedness involves more than just arms. Obviously creating communities and networks is incredibly important as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I think that the Trump Regime has inadvertently created the communities that will resist them in the future: former military staff of good character and skill have been exiled, as have many government workers. These people will form the backbone of future governments.

    The Trump Regime has self-selected for corruption, cowardice, and servility, while creating foes that very much lack such qualities.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    I think you're right

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago*

    Nothing will change until the pedophile class lives in fear. We need a revolution

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I've always believed that we were living through the collapse of the American Hegemony, but I could never describe the system until I read about the Imperial Boomerang and the Five Phase Lifecycle which captures the US' expansionist policies post WW2. Except we never needed war, we had the petrodollar.

    The problem when you have a system that centralized, you have one major factor, and then the inability to grow leads to the empire turning within with its expansionist policies towards its people. Its the perfect system to have an incompetent boob turn cruel. And once that happens, everyone senses something wicked on the horizon. Soft power with allies completely vanishes. New allegiances are forged. A new hyperpower emerges. And the most defensive behavior is to protect your own interests -- which accelerate the inevitable collapse.

    The US is a very big country, and any future shape will have it more like a confederation -- either officially in its successor states, or more likely by Balkanization. Whether or not its the New America we want, well, I'm not that clairvoyant.

    I hope this makes sense, I'm not a political expert. All I am certain of, in my gut, is that Trump is the final manifestation of the decline phase, and this is the final act. The Roman empire went through many drastic 'collapses' in its span, this doesn't mark the end of America, but of the current post-WW2 hegemony? The one driven by the GI Bill and Technological progress? We aren't coming back from this.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I think the United States as we knew it is dying. I feel no kinship with the MAGA nor the Epstein Class, my desire to be kind and fair towards that lot has long since evaporated. Odds are, many folks in Tennessee and Minneapolis feel the same.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    I think the United States as we knew it is dying

    I grew up in the US south.

    This IS the US as I've known it.

    The rest of the country got complacent about the people that supported the splitoff faction that wanted to own people as backwoods hicks and not as a viable threat despite them infesting many of the states that literally sent men to die to stop them. Laughed when they said "The south will rise again" despite them having an outsized power in politics and when called out were nice when they said "It's heritage, not hate."

    They were ready to arrest those who went against the president during Bush Jr era. Nixon welcomed them into the fold after LBJ pissed off the Dixiecrats by signing in the Civil Rights Acts and every Republican since, just as the Democrats did before. The country never finished the job and now the house is infested.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] 34 points 6 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago

    Blaming the Republican party is wrong

    not it isn't, they have much to be blamed for. but there's plenty of blame to go to other groups, too.

    If the South and rural areas had equal access to wealth and education

    If you think the North and urban areas do have equal access then you need to take another look. The oligarchs are quite fond of living in metropolitan areas and segregating education between public and private schools.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    it’s the rich continuously stealing more capital and destroying businesses that is the problem

    The rich are rich because they own the businesses. They own the means of production. The problem is capitalism; it’s private ownership of the means of production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 6 months ago

    I don't really, Dems are pretty useless and bought by the rich as well. Which is why the two party system can't work to solve these issues effectively. I don't blame Trump either, he is more a symptom, than the problem

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    the uniparty is the problem I agree

    France's two party system was overturned electorally within the past 10 years, the UK's is currently in the process, but maybe the same thing can't happen in the USA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I agree that it's the rich that are the root of the problem, but also I don't understand what the Republican party is (since the great depression) if not a roundabout way to harness fear of downward social mobility to vote in favor of the rich.

    And when I say "I don't understand", I mean I really don't understand, because I also recognize that the rich pulled the same shit back in the civil war on the uneducated southern Democrats. The way I see it, today we have "Temporarily Embarrassed Billionaires" fighting for the rich in case they ever get rich, but back in the 1800s they had "Temporarily Embarrassed Slave Owners" who were, again, fighting for the rich in case they ever got rich.

    I guess I'm supposed to conclude that the "liberalism" of that time was just misguided because it was attempting to justify abridging others' individual freedoms as an individual freedom. And then maybe the "republic" of Republicanism was seen as the elite telling the uneducated, "the masses are too dumb to be trusted with a direct democracy, we need to elect an educated intermediary to represent us". If so, that seems like....not even close to what the Republican party stands for today; Trump was elected on a Populist platform, the opposite of a Republic.

    tl;dr I get that despite the corruption in the DNC, liberalism is a valuable philosophy worth refining and progressing toward. But I don't know what the Republican party still has that's worth keeping.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It's not a matter of 'fixing it'. The USA is transforming itself from a liberal democracy to a christian theocracy. Evangelical leaders have been working on this since the 1980's. They want to change the constitution to remove the separation of church and state. This is what Project 2025 is all about. They are about 60% there. The first act of the new Christian Nationalism will be the American Genocide of trans, gays and lesbians. This is what ICE is being groomed for. They must be willing and able to execute women and children in the camps they are setting up. Renee Good was the test case. Get ready, the program has been copied from Nazi Germany, look it up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Sounds right, but the brand of christianity being pushed is not the usual tension between liberal and conservative brands of the same religion like you see with judiasm and islam. Its more a grifter christianity that hardly ever talks about christianity at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    Well, it depends on what you mean by "fixing it". Could things be reformed to meet a status quo similar to pre-1970 without violence? Sure. Reform like that would be difficult, it would take decades, and it would take a lot of political will. Reform like that would be akin to a house of cards, all it would take is a single Republican majority for a single term to knock it back down. I also think reforms like that are completely inadequate to resolving the underlying problem that has put us in these times: capitalism. Assuming reform is successful, we'll be right back in the same spot about 80 years later. For things to be truly fixed, we need to overthrow capitalism. This will be violent and tumultuous.

    Is reforms from Democrats enough?

    Lol. Lmao. Definitely not. Democrats have no solutions.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Watch this.

    EDIT: But now I'm finally going to get around to asking this: do any of you, living in the US, vote?

    Would you ever consider voting DSA/Socially democratic, even if your views are to the left of them and you are anti-capitalist? What if voting for the PSL is not an option where you are? Would you ever vote for someone like Trump just to make things intentionally worse in the hopes of sparking off a revolution? Not sure if I will ever vote again at this point...

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    No, plenty of us believe it. I didn't recently purchase 10+ different guns and a ton of ammo because I think things will work out.

    Unfortunately, more people think diplomacy and peaceful protest and waiting until the next time to vote will be enough.

    It's fucking dumb.

    If my plan to leave the US permanently fails, I'm prepared for literal civil war.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    10+ guns sounds pretty dumb ngl, 2-3 is fine. rest is better spent helping build some kind of network of support with your local neighborhood.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Guns are pretty stupid. You're building a society of individualism, distrust and violence. Not one where a decent human being would live happily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago*

    What makes you say that? Just because someone has a different opinion then you doesn't make them a bot or a troll.

    Decent human beings are a myth until proven otherwise. Now, in the era of unprecedented abundance, we mistreat people by withholding the basic necessities of life from them.

    There is no place to live happily until we make it happen. If this other person wants to be wrong, let em.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί