I don't think that similar mindsets would be a goal. They lived in a world 250 years ago. They owned slaves. They basically owned their wives.

What you need are people who actually draw the right conclusions from the mistakes that have been made on those 250 years.

The interesting thing is they intended for the Constitution to be updated periodicity To keep up with the times.

None. I don't trust any politicians of this day and age to be honest and responsible enough to do it.

Drafting a new constitution is fairly unnecessary outside of deposing an aristocracy or a dictatorship. Plus, it only has any effect if everyone agrees on it so you will need literally everyone to have some input and agree or else you will have seperationists.

I would just add the following and call it good:

1. No cap on the house of Representatives.

2. Term limit on EVERY elected individual, cabinet appointee, and judge.

3. Senate seats proportional to population with the smallest state receiving 1, a state double its size receiving 2, etc.

4. The President is not immune to indictment and has no authority over the DOJ.

EDIT:

\5. Individual campaign funds are capped, organizations funds require signatures and count towards the individual totals, with enforcement of federal prison time on ALL involved in the case of going over. Proven illegal funding can invalidate election results and trigger a new election automatically.

\6. In the event of an absence a new election must be called immediately, and any attempt to delay the process can be met for prison time.

\7. Total Bodily Autonomy - doctors are still expected to adhere to strict antinegligience practices and conditions, can choose to decline patients, but if a patient is informed of risks for proven safe procedures then it is their choice to have whatever medical procedure or even cosmetic procedure performed on their body as they wish.

There's plenty of extremely accomplished and well respected legal Scholars and constitutional Scholars and and such who are writing and operating right now. You don't hear about them much because they're not you know clickbait Worthy, but they're out there. There's no reason to think they are less capable than the founding fathers. We tend to mythologize the founding fathers to an absurd degree.

You fucking know it would be vibe written by AI

Snap elections. If someone fucks up, vote em out. No more of this "oh no I guess we have to wait 4-5 years before we can do anything" bullshit.

Most important thing is:

Votes should be out of ALL SEATS, not only those present.

Example: 101 seats in a legislature

51 Team A

50 Team B

Team B shouldn't be able to just assassinate 2 of Team A to win majority. Fuck that shit. An empty seat should be treated as if it were a "no" vote.

The current system is basically favoring the side that supports political violence. And this shit is the same around the world. Just block your opposition from entering the building and voila! You get a majority.

Seriously am I the only one in the world that see this bullshit! Why are politicians so dumb? I should run this planet goddammit.

You'd need to get 1,000 random Americans in a room for a year with supervised communication/visitations with their family. No chance for sponsorships, no being bought off, no one is a political figure.

I don't think the Constitution at all needs a rewrite. I think the ideals of the Framers are just as important and valid today as they were when they were put to paper. Our problems come not from inadequacies in the Constitution, but from our own inadequacy to follow its teachings.

I don't really have an answer for who should write it but I think they need to think about how MAGA came into power and create precautions against it ever happening again.

If politicians commit serious crimes, they need to be immediately removed from office and barred from running again

To be honest stuff like that should be delegated to team of historians lawyers and engineers. And put on the github like open source code before implementing.