The fact global shipping now treats “possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz” as something that can be worked around is honestly kind of insane on its own.

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 6 months ago (7 children)

then what is the fucking problem?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Fuel/oil Maersk, if I recall, does container shipping and has other ways of moving boxes, but all of them burn fuel

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    And oil isnt moving because the straight is closed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    This is a really shoddily written article. Bad. Basically he’s saying that fuel costs will remain high and from a business standpoint the risk doesn’t go to zero just because Trump says everything is rainbows. Therefore shipping faces increased costs, which raises prices for consumers, which hurts demand, which lowers shipping volume. And that systemic slowdown doesn’t disappear overnight because Trump says yippee.

    I think. If the article weren’t total shit, maybe it would be clearer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Where does most global shipping go to and from?

    China.

    Who isn't affected by the closure of the strait at all?

    China.

    Good work Trump, America First!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    China depends on Iranian oil, which is why Iran tried the partial blockade to let friendly ships through. That forced the US to try and enforce a full blockade to prevent China from being less affected than everyone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It’s absolutely epic that Iran found a way for their adversary to enforce the very blockade which their adversary took issue with. Like… holy hell. That’s some boss level shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The main issue in the short term was ships being stuck and ships not being able to get to their destinations in there. Now that's sorted out, it's just a fuel cost issue.

    It's a dead end in there, you can't get through it like you can through the red sea into Suez. They are more concerned about that channel. That's why the french have a carrier group near there, to protect shipping against the houthis instead of joining the US in it's current mistake.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment