Yeah there is. It's old too and needs no qraphics.

Furthermore, nothing is absolute except the lack of absolute. It's all about gradients, targets means, barriers and most of it doesn't matter but that doesn't mean what you think it should mean and neither does that.

Well, if the other person uses protonmail, your client encrypts the email content before submitting it, which means protonmail can't read it.

If they do not use protonmail, well, protonmail can. They apparently store the emails after they have been sent encrypted with a key in your account, so they can't read them afterwards.

I can encrypt a message with your public key, and only you can decrypt it. The db will store the encrypted version.

For example.

This is not necessarily what/why they do it, just one example of how asymmetric ciphers can be useful in an email scenario.

Tux don't cry. 'Specially not about obvious lies.

Many say its really bad because they are complying with subpoeanas, but email itself is most often not encrypted anyway

But if youre using your acc for stuff that needs actual opsec, use something else

I personally prefer fastmail tho

I have a paid tier. I like it. Beats the shit outta the big G.

I pay for it b/c running privacy focused services is not free. I want a world where we have choices besides Big Surveilence Tech. I could get by with the free tier. I pay anyway.

If you send to other proton addresses, or to other co's with compatible encryption, it can make email E2EE. Otherwise, it's not, like if the other end is on a gmail address or w/e.

It doesn't 100% solve the probs. But it doesn't do G style spying of your email contents. That's worth supporting to me.

If you do not see the option in your account yet, there is nothing you need to do. It will become available soon.

Not seeing it anywhere either