1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 6 months ago

Just stop making products for Americans.

  • source
  • 32 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 90 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    That was the idea. Tech companies don‘t want us to have nice things because it makes their products look all the more shitty. And so they attack anything open source that they don‘t directly benefit from. Some investors are probably seeing the shitty ink printer business and hope they can degrade 3D printing to that degree too. They take any opportunity to fuck the small people for a chance of making an easy buck.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    This has nothing to do with the tech industry. This is the firearms industry 100%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    If the firearms industry think that a 3d printed gun is good enough to compete with them, they are selling shitty products.

    It is more plausible that they want to control the 3d printed guns because they are not able (or willing) to stop the people who want to commit some kind of crimes and cannot buy a gun from building one (since, as I understand, to buy the components it seems you have not to undergo a backgroubd check).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    You think we are at a endpoint with 3d printing technology? As technology improves the ability to make better parts will keep increasing.

    You are right, it is about control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    You think we are at a endpoint with 3d printing technology? As technology improves the ability to make better parts will keep increasing.

    No, we are not at a endpoint even if I don't think there is much more to be done that can improve the tech in some revolutionary way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 74 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    California needs to wise up and realize that you can make functional firearms out of $20 worth of hardware store parts. They can't stop the signal.

    Shinzo Abe got his cheeks clapped with a homemade gun in a country with roughly zero legal civilian firearms, and a violent crime rate of less than 1 per 100,000.

    Can't stop the signal.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 20 points 6 months ago*

    They probably know this perfectly well. But there are corporations and their lobbyists to think of, and they'd much prefer it if ordinary people weren't able to build their own devices and spare parts, but instead had to buy them at inflated prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    What they want is not about guns. It's about checking all your prints to make sure you are not printing something you can buy retail, or an overpriced plastic appliance part.

    Fuck BAMBU labs, let's get back to air gapped printers.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    "request a quote"

    Ya I'm gonna say that's a $2500+ printer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It is, but the reason for not showing the price is because it's tailored to customer security requirements.
    Retail is $2K, and there's a lot more that goes into the crit infra edition, as well as paperwork and accreditations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 41 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    “Scans for 3D printed firearm” yeah okay. It’s totally going to detect that with 100% accuracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    time for underground 3d printers

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Idiots who don't understand 3D printers pass laws regulating 3D printers to supposedly prevent gun violence. Gun violence unaffected. News at 11.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I wonder how many "Ban Boaty!" t-shirts I can sell to propenents of this.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    It's almost like a strong, centralized government with power over our everyday lives can be easily subverted into doing things we don't really want it to do.

    Huh

    Weird.

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/stallmanwasright@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    This is not about guns. This is about the increasing use of 3D printers in right to repair and printing parts.

    What they want is to block you from making a $30 flimsy plastic part better for $0.60. So they will use AI to check your STLs and block you from printing anything that you can buy.

    The gun issue is stupid. If they really cared about that, they would block gun manufacturers from selling gun parts no questions asked, because no one can actually 3D print and working gun out of plastic without actual gun parts of metal.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Also, not every gun is lethal. It is perfectly acceptable to make nerf guns. The law in Canada for example is it just needs to have below a certain muzzle velocity.

    This is more a US gun culture issue than a 3D printer issue, and they're just trying to scapegoat things.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    From the research I did awhile back it seemed you could trace this lobbying straight back to gun manufacturers. This is NOT about public safety and it is about keeping disruptive competition out of the market.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    This is what happens when one party has total control. Please stop being freaks Republicans!

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/3dprinting@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Can we please have idiots who don't know what the fuck they're doing stop passing clueless laws?

  • source