FBI Director Kash Patel was twice arrested in incidents involving alcohol, once for public intoxication and once for public urination after leaving a bar, he admitted in a 2005 letter about disclosures on his Florida Bar application.

The letter obtained by The Intercept was part of Patel’s personnel file at the Miami-Dade Public Defender’s Office, where he once worked. The document, written “per instructions of my employer,” describes incidents of alcohol-related indiscretions not uncommon for those in their teens and twenties.

Two decades later, as Patel pushes back against allegations that drinking is impairing his leadership of the nation’s top law enforcement agency, these arrests show how Patel’s alcohol use has been subjected to scrutiny before in his professional life.

“In a gross deviation from appropriate conduct, we attempted to relieve our bladders while walking home.”

One incident recounted by Patel occurred in 2005, about four months before he wrote the letter. At the time, he was a law student at Pace University in New York celebrating with friends.

“We went to a few of the local bars and consumed some alcoholic drinks,” he wrote.

When they walked home, they made a bad decision.

“In a gross deviation from appropriate conduct, we attempted to relieve our bladders while walking home,” Patel said in the letter. “Before we could even do so, a police cruiser stopped the group. We were then arrested for public urination.”

Patel paid a fine after the incident, he wrote in the letter.

A letter by Kash Patel from his personnel file at the Miami-Dade Public Defender’s Office. Source: Miami-Dade Public Defender’s Office.

“Kash’s entire background was thoroughly examined and vetted prior to him assuming this role,” said Erica Knight, a spokesperson for Patel. “These attacks are nothing more than an attempt to undermine a process that has already deemed him suitable to serve and a distraction to the record-breaking success of the FBI under Director Patel.”

During an earlier incident in 2001, Patel wrote that he was arrested for public intoxication for drinking underage as a college student at the University of Richmond in Virginia. Patel helped run the Richmond Rowdies, a student fan group, and attended a home basketball game to help lead cheers. In his letter, Patel wrote that he was escorted out of the arena by a school officer due to excessive cheering.

“Upon exiting the arena,” he wrote, “the officer placed me under arrest for public intoxication, as I was not yet of 21 years of age.”

Patel said in his letter that he’d had two drinks and paid a fine following the arrest. According to NBC News, which previously reported his 2001 public intoxication arrest, Patel was found guilty on a misdemeanor charge days after the incident.

Patel’s letter about the Florida Bar disclosures has not previously been reported. The Intercept obtained Patel’s personnel file through a public records request to the Miami-Dade Public Defender’s Office, where Patel was hired on a $40,000 salary after being admitted to the Florida Bar.

“Both of these incidents are not representative of my usual conduct of behavior,” he wrote to conclude the letter, “and it is my hope that the Board views them as an anomaly. I dually apologize for my improper behavior both to the Board and the community at large.”

Patel Drinking Allegations

Twenty years after writing the letter, Patel became the ninth director of the FBI. His tenure has been marked by controversies, including over the firing of agents who worked on investigations of President Donald Trump, the use of his government jet, and lawsuits filed by his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, over false claims that she is a former Mossad agent.

More recent concerns about Patel’s drinking followed the release of a viral video in February of the FBI director chugging a beer with the U.S. Olympic hockey team in Italy.

Pressure mounted with a report in The Atlantic alleging, through anonymous sources, that Patel has been intoxicated at the social club Ned’s in Washington and the Poodle Room in Las Vegas, another private club. The Atlantic reported that Patel’s drinking has been “a recurring source of concern across the government.”

[

Related

Kash Patel Is Using MAGA’s Favorite Tool to Muzzle the Free Press](https://theintercept.com/2026/04/23/kash-patel-atlantic-lawsuit/)

Patel denied The Atlantic’s claims and filed a defamation lawsuit. “These claims about erratic behavior and excessive drinking are fabricated,” Patel’s lawyer, Jesse R. Binnall, wrote in the complaint.

“I have never been intoxicated on the job, and that is why we filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit,” Patel said at a press conference on Tuesday. “And any one of you who wants to participate, bring it on. I’ll see you in court.”

The post Kash Patel Got Arrested for Public Urination After a Night of Drinking appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • 87 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 202 points 6 months ago (40 children)

    This was over 20 years ago. Let's focus on his modern fuck-ups instead when he was barely of drinking age.

  • source
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] [S] 36 points 6 months ago (30 children)

    it helps to establish a pattern of behavior. it's relevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [+] 25 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] 98 points 6 months ago (23 children)
  • [–] [S] 22 points 6 months ago (21 children)

    agree with jack, the headline is massively misleading.

    I don't disagree that the title is misleading, but that wasn't Jack's complaint. And I didn't change the article's original title, particularly because I crossposted this to several comms, some of which have rules against this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (20 children)

    All y'all saying the right things

    This is old. Who hasn't peed in a bush once, or thrice, etc

    But most of us aren't foolish enough to do so in a visible/observable way, and most of us aren't currently part of the Drunkard's Parade that's fuckin up the country with great enthusiasm and effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] [S] -8 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    Who hasn’t peed in a bush once, or thrice, etc

    not someone who should be running the FBI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    This is the kind of shit which makes it hard to take liberal news sources seriously.

    Genuinely, if you have a problem with some one who caught a ticket for public urination in their, honestly whenever, I don't want to be politically aligned with you.

    It's a stupid form of puritanical politics I want nothing to do with. The guy is a piece of shit now, that is what matters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 6 months ago* (9 children)

    It’s pretty ridiculous that anyone would defend this guy, or especially that you would call it “Puritanical politics“

    That’s what makes it so hard to take you seriously

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    The fuck else would you call what you are catching mass down votes for?

    If you would you consistently apply this standard to all candidates, I would want NOTHING to do with your political project.

    I want people who've both pissed in public and gotten caught. I want people who have had real human lives not those secured by the guardrails of class or capital. This guy's a cunt but not because he caught a minor infraction 20 years ago and focusing on that is distracting from the real price of shit that he is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    I’m not responsible for everyone else’s poor standards. Stop blaming me for your terrible choices, lol.

    And your defense of Kash Patel is what’s distracting from what a real piece of shit he is. Rationalizations don’t change that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Not defending Kash Patel, I'm dismissing your puritanism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    By defending Kash Patel. It’s pretty pathetic how your rationalizing it too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    Its not defending the guy when you're painting with such a broad brush.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    I can’t believe that you’re trying to define what you’re singing by what I’m saying. That beyond ridiculous into the absurd.

    At this point, you’re obviously just trolling. I’m just gonna block you now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    The problem isn't that he ever did this, the problem is that it was entirely believable that he would do it today (because he's a careless idiot, not a college student who would later stop such shenanigans). But I agree with the person saying it's old news and not really worth bringing up right now especially given the misleading title.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Imma be real with you. If you find a candidate for that role who claims not to have had such minor indiscretions in their past: that person is lying. Whether that makes them a good or bad candidate for the FBI is left as an exercise for the reader.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Defending Kash Patel with some hypothetical isn't a strong argument, especially, because, ya know, Kash Patel, who would make a good or bad candidate is, in fact, up to congress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    No one here is defending Kash Patel, they're saying that pissing in a bush isn't a big deal, especially compared to many other things he's responsible for. You're just making yourself look like an idiot for not understanding this, you can agree that this isn't a good look for him and does show relevance to today while also agreeing that pissing in a bush isn't a big deal. Unless you do think it's a big deal, in which case you need to touch grass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    that's exactly what's going on. its absurd to even deny it.

    dude's been a drunk his whole life, and here you all are trying to defend him. it's pathetic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It demonstrates a lifetime pattern of irresponsible drinking, which is relevant to the discussion. This isn't a new thing, something that happened from the pressures of his new job, etc. This is a lifelong problem that has been ignored, and is now a National Security Threat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You are allowed to swear here on the internet, but if you truly don't want to say fuck-ups then just don't say it. Or change it to from fuck-ups to foul-ups, mess ups, or something.

    See, I'm petty, so self censoring just makes me not want to agree with you.
    However, fucks sake, I do agree with you...but begrudgingly. FUCK UPS.

    Your one self censorship had led to me writing fuck-ups four times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I use f***up instead of the alternatives when I want to say fuckup, but I don't like reading the word and I don't want to force it on others. It has nothing to do with censorship. Everyone knows what I'm referring to. Some people just don't like swear words, they're often from academic backgrounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago*

    This is confusing to me, which I understand is a me problem not a you problem, I just don’t understand why you wouldn’t use a different word when you say you don’t like reading the word. Saying he’s incompetent, careless, reckless, irresponsible; I don’t know what word would make the most sense but I feel like using a curse word is generally a crutch anyway. I still use them but if I didn’t like reading them I wouldn’t use the crutch. I expect academics have a preference against it because they have a more broad range of conversational words they choose from more so than finding it offensive. I have a really hard time believing an educated adult finds the word fuck offensive. I would believe people find it lazy or juvenile and would make them less likely to engage and biases their opinion of who they are speaking with, even if unintentionally, but self censoring does nothing to change that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago

    hilarious that none of this would have come to light but he could not just let it lie.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    The thing that pisses (heh) me off about this is, is that we’re talking about Crash mcgoogly eyes here takin a leak. Like we’re still living 20 years ago where this would have been a big scandal.

    Meanwhile the US still has a sun downing pedoffender in the Oval Office who’s getting blackmailed by Israel to fuck up this planet and life on it for generations to come.

    Don’t get me wrong, Krash ain’t any better and deserves what’s coming to him. But there’s bigger fish to fry front and center instead of this incompetent fool.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    As much as I hate this shitty fuck, public urination is a stupid "crime". No one and nothing is hurt by it, instead lets focus on actual horrible shit hes done.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 6 months ago* (18 children)

    it's wasn't "just" public urination, he'd been drinking beforehand, which shows that it's relevant behavior. and it wasn't just a single incident, it was two, the previous when he was underage:

    During an earlier incident in 2001, Patel wrote that he was arrested for public intoxication for drinking underage as a college student at the University of Richmond in Virginia. Patel helped run the Richmond Rowdies, a student fan group, and attended a home basketball game to help lead cheers. In his letter, Patel wrote that he was escorted out of the arena by a school officer due to excessive cheering.

    “Upon exiting the arena,” he wrote, “the officer placed me under arrest for public intoxication, as I was not yet of 21 years of age.”

    despite your attempts to downplay the issue, this shows that not only did Patel have a drinking problem from an early age, but it was serious enough that it got him into legal trouble before he was even of legal drinking age-- demonstrating a serious pattern of behavior that would have disqualified anyone else from the role of FBI director.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago*

    Here's the thing. I don't actually give a fuck if he pissed in public, cheered so loud he got kicked out of a game, or if he's even struggling with addiction of any sort.

    None of that actually matters. The only thing that I give a shit about is the horrors he's used the agency to commit. And pearl clutching about him being an addict like its some sort of irredeemable moral failure is some weak-ass shit that excuses the real issue, the fascist actions of the agency.

    Now, I recognize that America can't actually prosecute him for doing fascist shit, as that would mean that weaponizing state-run police forces against minority groups and political dissidents is wrong and America cannot weather that sort of ruling.

    So instead I guess we gotta do this capital C Conservative bullshit.

    I bet he doesn't even pray to the right God!! Is he faithful to his wife?? If he drinks, he might also... GAMBLE!!! Has anyone looked into that?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    If you want to show a pattern, you have to show a PATTERN.

    This is a data point, not a particularly good one.

    The guy is a giant POS, for a hundred thousand reasons more salient than this.

    If the guy was doing a great job, I wouldn't give a shit if he was loaded 24x7.

    Edit:

    If sobriety was a reasonable indicator of competence and capacity Utah would be the capital of the planet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Hey, he did a great job cheering for the basketball team but apparently that was deemed too "excessive" for the officer...

    Maybe this point in history is the beginning of the villain origin story behind him ending up as FBI chief, wanting to exact revenge on that specific officer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Listen, I'm confident half of Lemmy has done this. And I was an idiot as a kid, but I grew up. Unless he was also the director of the FBI them, or in route to it other than through the passage of time, it's pointless to bring up.

    I appreciate your distaste for him. I've got it too. This ain't it though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I guess I have higher standards for the director of the FBI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Except if you'll condemn him for pissing on a bush when he was 20, I promise you you'd sentence me to death. He's doing plenty wrong now. Let's get him on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    this shows that not only did Patel have a drinking problem from an early age, but it was serious enough that it got him into legal trouble before he was even of legal drinking age

    Would've been good to post it with this framing. Probably would've gotten less pushback.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Are you really saying pissing on the sidewalk is a serious crime if you're young and drunk?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    No. You just said that.

    And you’re not very good at reading

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago

    The least of my problems with him. This actually humanizes him.

    I don't want that.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I believe they need to start randomly drug testing politicians and public officials. They should be held to the same standards as the 30% of the workforce that are legally required to be part of the government's drug-free workplace program.

    If the person manufacturing their toilet paper isn't allowed to smoke weed or take drugs, they shouldn't be allowed to either. Since the head of the FBI is undoubtedly a sensitive safety position, they shouldn't even be allowed to take prescription controlled substances.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    Now now, let’s be fair. He’s not a drunk anymore. Thanks to the massive amount of cocaine he snorts on a daily basis, he is now completely immune to the effects of alcohol.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Pretty sure this puts you on the offender list don't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I am not a lawyer, but every state has different laws and penalties.](https://teamjustice.com/public-urination-laws-penalties-by-state/). None of them will normally put you on the sex offender list for simple public urination. This of course assumes you aren't doing something to elevate it to the level of public indecency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago*

    Yeah because taking a piss when you need is so fucking awful. The only thing wrong about that if shops says no to use their bathroom or/and because there's no/not enough clean secure free public bathroom. Basic needs of life.

    Dude is a fucktard that should at least not be there tho

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Pissing out the window and shitting out the window are two different things

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    He's going to be fired in 3....2....1.....

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Is there anything left you don't get arrested for in the US?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [B] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    compared to howard lutnic, trump, hegseth and others he is better

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    That must be the coolest thing about Kash Pastel, tbh.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    Thank GOD almighty we DONT have DEI hires Anymore! Now we ONLY get the Best! MOST Competent! MOST Educated! Drunkest!

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    Don't really care about that, but WHERE'S NANCY, ASSHOLE

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Fucking “who cares” people, gtfo. This man (and why doesn’t he go by Kashyap anymore anyway?) is clearly a dysfunctional alcoholic in his position unethically at least, if not illegally, over the nation’s law enforcement division.

    His piss-poor performance (heh) is likely partially related to his inability to moderate, and his fake outrage at being called out for what he knows goddamned well to be true is shown to be a long-time issue for him and reason #113,625 why he should be removed and indicted for perjury, unlawful use of, and so on.

    No one gives a sweet flying fuck if you did it too. It’s not about you this time. FFS.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    If this was from his current tenureship then it would be relevant, but this is a victimless crime that happened decades ago. So yeah, who fucking cares? His current day indiscretions are the problem, not the fact that he got arrested for taking a piss when he was in his twenties. That's a fucking nothingburger. Clutch your pearls harder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 1 comment in c/news@lemmy.world view that post

    Aw, I thought it was like last night or something. The events are from 05.

  • source