Why waste time like this? Wouldn't it be better if cinemas would use vertical screens where a popular youtuber would describe the plot of the movie in like 30 seconds while talking at 2x speed?
post
Look, I am the type who watches lectures at 1.25x or 1.5x speed or something. But movies? It'd ruin the pacing. If you can't bring up the attention to watch a movie then maybe you just shouldn't
Why waste time watching an entire movie when you can just read the spoilers and know what's it about in less than 5 minutes?
I... what? I'm suddenly very happy for David Lynch, that he didn't live long enough to see this catch on...
It hasn't...caught on? People have just stopped going to movies as much, and I don't think 4 concurrent showings of the new Jurassic Park movie at speeds 1x thru 2x are saving them.
The industrial revolution and it's consequences....
Just like me fr :3
YouTube added customisable speeds recently!
I find 1.4 to be enjoyable, but 2x if I need to get through something dense.
How much crap are you watching if you have to speed it up to get through it all?
If you look at old silent movies, they were played at different speeds in different cinemas and projections. There wasn't a standard way to play a movie, no "you NEED to play the movie at this specific speed or it will be ruined". I'm not saying the same should apply to modern movies, but I find it interesting.
That is not true. There was a standard, which is different from todays standard. Which is why it looks funny being played at todays standard, but mostly they get digitally fixed and they look completely natural now.
I imagine in a few decades we might have AI media. You could read a web novel with a fewer or a lot of pictures, or read it as a manhwa / webtoon, or as an anime, or as a virtual reality 3D experience that is semi-interactive. And you could give instructions to shorten or expand it, or even diverge in the plot a little, or change the characters. More like the holodeck with a VR headset.
So anything except actually enjoying reading a book.
The book still exists, nobody is taking that away. But now you can enjoy it in different media forms.
Maybe more like someone reading you a book while you can ask questions or give feedback. And maybe instead of just watching pictures / illustrations, you could also describe your own imagination more detailed or give some rough sketches and create your own illustrations to the text. Like a modding feature for books and you can share the mods with other readers.
Again, none of those things are “enjoying a book.”
And you don’t need AI to do any of those things. You can do them now if you want.
No you can't, economics won't allow it. Can you turns a novel into a comic or an anime or life action tv series? Creating good art or entertainment doesn't just require some brilliant creative idea, but specialists who work together on things, using expensive specialist equipment. Youtube and cheap video cameras allowed for an explosion of individual content creators to create shows, replacing things like e.g. cooking shows, or shows about building or houses or traveling or gardening.
With the right AI tools you could replace a lot of that. Obviously at a lower maximum quality. But we are already being fed corporate entertainment slop. There will be a lot of AI slop, but a few people will be able to turn their ideas into reality even if it's not quite "Hollywood quality". This short currently seems the best example. And the tools will only get better, and the medium will expand.
When VR headsets came out (oculus, vive) there was a lot of talk about VR movies. I suspect that only with AI tools will we be able to have the creative freedom (= low capital costs) to do things like that.
I’m not talking about economics. I’m talking about creating art for the sake of your own soul.
You are talking about content. That’s the disconnect.
Well, economics always enters into it.
Is that short I linked content or art? It cost time and money but it's vastly less than what it would take to create traditionally. Without AI, that guy might never have been able to create that, the "the sake of his soul". I want "working people" to be able to give it a try with whatever tools, including AI. Become directors or authors of "holonovels". AI allows for a new type of art medium.
There will always be content or slop. Always people who just want to sell garbage or people who want to be creative and think they can but are no good. But the tools empower both. A lot of content on youtube is scary garbage, like even before AI there was stuff that genuinely made me horrified, but that is an issue with moderation and not listening to the demands of the community. But there is so much amazing videos too which wouldn't have been possible or found an audience without the platform and the tools (e.g. cheap video cameras, video editing software).
PS: I do wish for standards or regulations so it's clearly marked which parts are generated and which parts are human made.
I’m not talking about the end product. I’m talking about the process of creation. That is what art is for.
I’d rather someone make a shitty video by themselves or with their friends than just type some text into a computer and it spits out stolen work that is statistically likely to match the request. It’s soulless.
There is no doubt the creator of that short had a creative experience though. Why shouldn't a dilettante "play" at film directing using shortcuts? And the work as a whole is clearly not stolen, but unique.
I'd kinda would love to see that AI short remade now, with a prompt "make this as as shitty video that was produced by an amateur and his friends, without professional actors and no production value" haha.
This is when noncreatives will learn that making good stuff is hard 😅
I can kind of understand the people who speed up audiobooks and podcasts. But movies? That's nuts. |
I wonder if OP was alive during the VCR era. I bet they would have loved the FF button. AKA chipmunk mode.
Does this person not pay for their ticket? It costs 15$ for a ticket at our theater. Why would I want to waste that money by having it sped up? It's hard enough finding movies that are worth watching in the first place.
I hate watching anything faster than normal. I want bad things to happen to this person.
do you want bad things to happen to OOP at 1.5x speed?
For obvious reasons this will never happen. That being said, I do the same with most content. When YouTube I use from 1.25 as an absolute minimum to 2.0 a lot of the time. Average being 1.5. For movies/series I tend to opt for 1.25-1.33.
But this all fails when any music is involved - then I dial it down to 1.0.
Jokes aside, I think this would actually be an interesting thing that would get younger people back in cinemas. At least for the absurdity of it.
Yeah and what if we played it backward and with the colors inverted
About 10 years too late I think. That dumb shit died out years ago.
I mean, this exists, so why not? https://www.screenslate.com/articles/shining-forwards-and-backwards
Nice, thanks for sharing. I might have missed it but does it say how they handled audio?
Superimposing images would probably have more happy accidents than superimposing reversed audio, which would probably just make things unintelligible.
Don't quote me on this (haven't seen it and only pulled partial clips before answering), but I think the audio just runs as per normal. Though it'd be kind of cool to have reverse audio as an option (if in a theatre, idk, have a set up kinda like what folks do for silent discos/some bluetooth device with serious multi-connection capacity or something, and people who opt for it have one earpiece in while the vanilla track plays in the room).
Only aware of it 'cause the rep theatre here did a screening once. Seemed cool.
for me to come back they would have to:
- get cheaper
- be less loud, like I feel like I could have hearing loss after going to the cinema
- better screen quality
- less annoying people
- no ads, seriously. I'm paying to see the thing and still have to endure ads? And people complain about streaming services when cinemas have been doing this for ages
This post would fit perfectly:
!opisafuckingidiot@lemmy.world
That community just has posts of people you individually disagree with or don't like in it. Like vegans, or women. I'll pass
There's like one post criticizing a women that is generalizing bad behavior and associating it with all men
and a maximum of 5% posts that are about vegans
You're implying they are sexist while defending a sexist post. Nice.
There's 10 posts in that com, out of which
- 1 is a woman making a TikTok about femicides
- 1 is a neurodivergent person talking about tone markers in text
- 1 is a vegan, in a vegan community, blurring images of meat
All of which are fucking idiots, apparently
... and then there's the one that just doesn't get a meme?
Read again. Slowly.
That community [the community that you moderate along with a carnist community] just has post of people you individually disagree with or don't like in it. Like vegans, or women. We should all pass
Now click the link and read again.
Like this where you attack a woman for having the gall to say men are scary, or this where you bully a neurodivergent person for explaining that they can't parse sarcasm? idk, kinda seems like "people you individually disagree with" is pretty apt. I mean, one of the posts is you not understanding a bad joke.
It's weird, because your profile shows you're aggressively anti Zionist and anti Russian imperialist, but then you also have this weird community for calling random people "fucking idiots" for seemingly no reason? Maybe direct your anger more towards the imperialism and less towards people who, at worst, are mildly annoying or wrong on the Internet.
Perhaps that you since you seem to be very salty about my community:

Or perhaps you are one of the other which featured there:
A guy who claims Israel has right to bombard residential apartments
A guy who claims Ukraine are "nazis"
A guy who claims Stalin was not a murderer and Gulags were OK.
All of which are fucking idiots.
I'm pro Israel for saying your anti Zionism is good but your attacking random (non Zionists) people online is bad?
The links I gave were definitely not those things you just said and we both know it, so drop the motte and bailey and own up to what you've been doing.
Really take some time to reflect on why you're so angry and defensive. Judging by the 3 replies I got from you, I think this was you desperately responding to save face, and I don't want that, I want you to take some time to think about this.
I'm pro Israel for saying your anti Zionism is good but your attacking random (non Zionists) people online is bad?
Read again. Slowly.
The links I gave were definitely not those things you just said
Yes. You conveniently omitted posts I just quoted to make your point.
Judging by the 3 replies I got from you, I think this was you desperately responding to save face
Don't flatter yourself. I responded with screenshots of the posts which I then decided to condense in one reply.
why you're so angry and defensive
I am neither, I just don't suffer fools gladly. Judging by your responses, that may include yourself.
You seem like an insane person. Imagine a hypothetical community that has a bunch of positive and uplifting content, but about 10% of posts are just making fun of trans people, or immigrants, or supporting Nazis, or what have you. Someone calls the community moderator on that content, and they go, "Read again. Slowly. Look at all these positive posts you're IGNORING."
Do you not understand how online communication works? This person was not referring to those other posts, so you bringing them up and acting all self-righteous about it just seems kinda silly and ridiculous. It's like pure rage bait behavior, but it seems like you actually believe it. They don't have any issue with those posts, didn't bring them up, and they don't excuse the harmful content you're hosting. I don't understand why you think the existence of positive posts makes the negative ones okay, or why you have a bizarre expectation that they have to weigh in the non-hateful content when judging the hateful.
"This user just posted Nazi apologia, but they have a different post supporting gay marriage so it must be okay!" This is what you sound like.
You seem like an insane person
"how to make friends and influence people"
🤣🤣🤣
What on earth are you on about? I have no interest in being your friend or influencing you. I'm having a good time making fun of a troll acting ridiculous.
What on earth are you on abou
Think. Be careful, it may hurt, you seem to not be used to it.
Is this the one response you have to everything that challenges you? Imagine if you addressed the points being made instead of implying that the reason you're incomprehensible is the reader's competence, instead of your bizarrely antisocial comments.
Is this the one response you have
Naah, I am trying to make it easier for you to understand.
Mission failed. Try responding to my longer message on its merits, instead of dismissing anything that causes cognitive dissonance.
Mission failed
I am not surprised, you are a piece of hard work. Don't worry, everyone loves you anyway sweetie.
High effort troll, though insulting people's intelligence while sticking your head in the sand like an ostrich is certainly a strategy. Good luck with that and your fascinating approach to discourse.
Reading is hard and understanding two layers (that you mean OOP and not OP of this post), is even harder
I guess it'd be a good place to post screenshots of your stuff. I did read it, you're not magically a genius for telling others to read slower.
top 80 comments