That seems pretty on brand for the MAGA cultist.
post
another woman. the purge continues. meanwhile, I'm sure that all the men receiving kickbacks and corporate sponsorships are totally safe.
a degree in homeland security
Okay then, that sounds like a real thing
Surprised the Felon-in-Chief didn’t want his cut of proceeds
The entire administration is exclusively "transactional relationships that pose a security risk," but she's a woman, so
How is a 29 year old a "top counter terrorism official"?
She has a degree in homeland security, what more could you possibly want?
I know a few 29 year old folks that would be infinitely better qualified than half the jackasses on this administration.
... what? What about that fact is fishy? Her age isn't the issue, it's how soon after graduating that she became a senior official but that's got jack to do with her age
Statistically, "top of your field" is a high enough bar that even 10 years of experience doesn't put you there.
It's not impossible, but it is fishy. Unless she graduated at age 9.
"Top official", however, means high ranking, not high skill. Just means someone in the Trump admin decided to put her in a high position. These positions probably get swapped out every time there's a new presidency (Trump's not gonna use Biden's people and Biden probably threw out a lot of Trump's people) so anyone taking the job needs to be either hungry for experience or passionate enough about national security, that they don't mind having a job for 4 years and then being told to fuck off.
Spending all that time getting a Doctorate in national security and also being 29 means she's probably both.
Unless she graduated at age 9.
Which would itself be WAY too fishy to let her anywhere near the intelligence community 😉
You have to be scum to begin with to work for this administration, so not surprised
I don't know how any POC, namely Latinos, would work or vote for him. Do they hate other Latinos?
If I saw something like this in a porn parody movie I'd call it lazy writing.
If you supposedly have a degree in it, from a supposedly accredited university, and you openly fuck it up like this, what does that say about you? Stupid? Arrogant? Greedy? Addicted to something? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
“Physics professor found injured after jumping off a barn flapping his arms”. Like - did you not learn about this in your curriculum?
She's hot. Latina. Young. And a pick me. Of COURSE she's fucked (literally... But still).
The legacy of this country's efforts at equality will be ultimately be more (sociopathic) black, gay, trans, etc. drone operator and CEOs. We can't have nice things.
I'm sure she's a fucking piece of shit the world would be a better place without, but how is accepting voluntarily made gifts from someone else any kinda crime? There might be aspects to this we don't know yet, but considering the original source for all of this is the Daily Mail and the Trump Administration I think it's safe to assume this is 100% pure misogynistic bullshit and they're just destroying the career of this woman (who thought the leopards wouldn't eat her face) because she refused to fuck someone with the power to throw a tantrum about it.
Its not a crime but stuff like this effects your security clearance and your clearance effects your job
Stuff like what? Being stalked?
Sex is often used in espionage- soliciting is one of those things that causes you to lose a security clearance (selling or buying- legal or not)
Sex work should be legal, but in this context it doesn’t matter as it’s a security risk.
In THIS context it’s also makes it evident how she got her job anyway, which is something par for the course with republicans
Can you not think of a scenario where your taking money from people can lead to compromising situations for the country?
Generally, once upon a time, people with bad financial situations did not get security clearance. Gambling debt? No clearance. Sugar baby? No clearance. It opens you up to being compromised.
Can you not think of a scenario where a Trump administration supporting executive would lie out of their asses to punish a woman who denied their advances?
Generally, once upon a time, people with bad financial situations did not get security clearance
The fucking president of the country might as well have his picture in the dictionary next to the entry on "bad financial situations," if you genuinely believe that's what this is about I've got a cryptocurrency to sell you
Yes. It’s pretty obvious. People in these positions need to not be so easily compromised by something as simple as money whether that is the president or anyone else.
And yes woman are treated worse and often the fall girls for a corrupt admin. But it doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be removed. They all need to be.
And yes woman are treated worse and often the fall girls for a corrupt admin. But it doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be removed. They all need to be.
Fair enough, being willing to work for this administration in any capacity demonstrates a lack of either intellect or morals or both that ought to be disqualifying for any government jobs, but by the same token I'm not going to take an allegation from someone affiliated with this administration about one of their own at face value. If a trustworthy voice like a Democratic lawmaker comes forward and says "I have information showing this person is corrupt and needs to be removed" I would be prepared to believe them, but a complaint from an executive who was happy to do business with this administration is meaningless.
At the end of the day any Trump administration official being removed from their job is a good thing, but we really shouldn't be taking claims made by anyone in their orbit at face value just because they're saying things we want to hear.
They are lying, but not for that reason. This nest of vipers is just getting started.
Elected vs appointed.
You could READ the article. Wild idea, I know, but it does an alright job explaining why her actions raise security concerns.
These sorts of transactional relationships create leverage that can be used against someone. They could also be used to obtain information socially.
On its own, do your thang girl. But when you have certain kinds of jobs, there are things you must abstain from.
It’s a crime because she must have lied about the gifts on her security clearance check.
A government employee having those kinds of relationships is a huge security risk, especially at DHS.
Was that stated in the article? Or are you just making it up?
She wouldn’t have passed the vetting if she had disclosed this.
Transactional personalities like this present a security risk. Multiple irregular streams of income make it easier to hide bribery. There may be more willingness to sell secrets. Such behaviour particularly if it goes into sexual relationships can lead to blackmail even if the subject is unwilling to divulge secrets for money.
If that were true, she should sue them for discrimination
Security vetted employment is at the discretion of the vetting agency.
And job seekers deserve rights against discrimination
Vetted jobs require discrimination.
On experience. Not on who you love in your personal time. Or on what legal side jobs you do.
Be realistic. Someone who engages in behaviour more likely to result in kompromat and who has opaque financial arrangements is completely unsuitable for classified work.
Unreported income and relationships means she lied during her security clearance investigation. Which is a crime.
It is a major security risk. Someone who sells a relationship for large sums of money is more likely to agree to sell secrets for large sums of money. Then questions need to be asked where this money is going. She allegedly claimed sugar daddies paid off her college loans. What else did they pay for. Who has financial influence over her. She sought to conceal this from her employer, which is a crime. I doubt she paid taxes on the income either.
She has a transactional personality, is comfortable deceiving DHS, is in the process of committing a crime and has opaque finances. This all points to her being a textbook target for approach by foreign intelligence or anyone who wants information.
Accepting gifts inplies a sense of obligation. When you're in a position of authority, that is leverage.
We can’t have sugar daddies and jobs? This is why the youth doesn’t want to work anymore.
She is a fucking fascist.
You can't lie about being a prostitute during your background investigation and hold a security clearance, no.
Meanwhile if your sugar daddy is the director of the FBI their agents will harass any journalists who report on it
Bet she probably hates sex work when others do it.
Varvaro has attended several MAGA events and has been photographed with President Donald Trump.
Even if I had sugar to burn, that’s a giant NOPE


all 87 comments