You're falling for the Nazi bait this is:

And of they can't, because they can't. Every parent is not the ideal parent and will never be, heck there's parents who are retarded (in the literal sense).

But lets say it's the average tech illiterate parent, who thinks computers are a gaming machine for kids. Imagine the amount of social engineering and how the marketing departments of companies trying to make kids addicted to their platform. The industries are pouring trillions of dollars in marketing, are you confident that regular parents have a chance of competing with them?

i'm in no way of supporting this because it's done for other nefarious reason, just commenting on the troupe that parents is responsible for their own kids. We can say that all day, but the reality is that they don't know what impact it has on their kids mental health and how damaging short term dopamine addiction is for their children. Society is still responsible to help parents navigate healthy behavior for their children.

Tbh if children was the concern of this law, then you would allow parents to sue tiktok and other platforms that have made their children addicted to the platform. You should also be able to sue influencers for promoting stuff to children (they know the age of their userbase).

Still parenting is hard, especially when you are competing with phds in behavioral science or psychologists that help these platforms design their addiction mechanism.

I love it how irresponsible people always make it harder for the rest of us. You know who I'm talking about. Yes, the fucking rich that's who. They don't pay taxes on their wealth and barely do on their income. All that money is missing to educate adults and children alike.

If adults had the time to be educated and to educate children, there wouldn't be such a stupid bill. There aren't enough teachers, parents dont earn enough to take the time to learn about technology, and children go to underfunded schools lacking teachers who have the time and pay to learn about this stuff and teach it to kids.

The rich are the source of all the problems here.

And I am fucking here for it.

I believe Ageless Linux is a meme distro to do exactly that.

I wish they would attempt to do that to all operating systems, that's a hell of a wide net and I'm damn sure not holding up my ID for my thermostat.

We don't all live in the US...

But that's food advice for people living there.

Yee of so little imagination, this is a FAFO opportunity!

Next step would be ageless approved license(s). Aggressively charge companies or individuals using ur copyrighted work if it's combined with any software which violates user privacy or that differentiates children from other users.

license violation fee

Charges a licensing fee, not per user, but per "affected child" globally or number of children globally whichever is greater, exp the national debt. Which will quickly approach infinity. This fee no longer applies when there are no longer any legislation globally which targets: freedom of speech, journalism, privacy, fuel efficiency, vehicle regulation, or gun control. Anything they compulsively cannot stop legislating.

Add executable poopoo, to compliment peepee, that runs software which violates this license. Along with a software package that has an ageless approved license. Distribute out to all linux distros, especially distros with server releases.

This would be much quicker than making suggestions to developers to promote packages with an ageless approved license.

My point being, collectively, tech copyright owners have outsized power greater than all the Mega IT corps combined. You flex that muscle by writing more aggressive licenses. Permissive and GPL might be a thing of the past cuz more aggressive licenses are required for the current era.

Otherwise legislators will tell you what you can write by threatening coders.

CC John McCardle (have messaged him with a link to this comment)

lol. Do you think this for real?