top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 218 points 7 months ago (30 children)

These days it seems like most things getting called "woke DEI crap" are totally in line with the norms of society, but someone wants to change that.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] [S] 71 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I never thought of it like that. Fuck, that's depressing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    99% of what you hear people like that accuse others of is pure protection. They're telling you what they want to do without realizing it, so "woke agenda trying to brainwash our kids!" could be translated into "we want to brainwash kids toward our ideology."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I remember a coworker saying something about trans people and how we can't say anything anymore because it all has to be about them or something. I never got the impression this person was bigoted. It seemed completely out of character. I said something like ("they just want equal rights and the same respect as you and I. What's the issue?") Maybe people should worry more about weather or not their kids are learning the life skills they need to survive and less about weather or not their kids see two dudes kissing in a movie. Mom and dad need to untighten their buttholes. Even if I don't understand something, I try to be empathetic and understanding to those who are different from me. I wish everyone else did.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago (18 children)

    the moment maga calls something woke... I embrace that game/tvshow/movie/book. they all turn out to be pretty good (other than a few gacha games)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    Sometimes they're accidentally right about something sucking, but always for a different reason than culture war BS. Ghostbusters 2016, for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

    I disagree, Ghostbusters: Answer the Call received way more hate than it deserved. I really enjoyed it and I have rewatched it a bunch of times, more than I’ve rewatched Ghostbusters 2. Holtzman is my favorite character and I love the goofy dance she does with Abby. And I love Chris Hemsworth’s character, he does big goofy handsome guy really well.

    It was way better than the last 2. I watched Afterlife once and I have no interest in watching Frozen Throne at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    My only issue with that movie was the timing of a few jokes (they made them longer than they should so they stopped being fun) and that the trailer spoiled half of the jokes. The movie itself is cool.

    The newest ones? their only redeeming quality for me is Egon's granddaughter. The kid is really good. Everything else is just the dumbest nostalgia bait ever (even having the mom's boyfriend a literal stand in for the kind of fan the movies pander to).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I can see where some of the jokes drag on a bit, but I’m personally ok with that. I’ve rewatched it a bunch of times when I use the elliptical or stationary bike at the gym. I feel like the extra laughs give my abs a workout 🤷‍♀️ lol. I laugh my ass off at “The power of Patty compels you!!” and “Is it more or less disgusting if I tell you it came out the front?” every single time. I adore Holtzman so much.

    For me, the new ones don’t have a redeeming quality, that’s not the kid actors faults though. Afterlife came out when we still weren’t going to theaters because of COVID. I was very excited for it and I bought it at full price the day it came out on iTunes. I watched it that night and the first thing I remember saying after it was over was “what the fuck was that shit?” All that nostalgia baiting cash grabbing was gross. And the CGI Egon at the end made me feel sick to my stomach, it felt disrespectful to Harold Ramis. I can’t even bring myself to be interested in Frozen Empire.

    I often see people complain that a franchise “forgot” what they are supposed to be about and IMO, that is exactly what happened with GBA and GBFE. They completely forgot that GB is a raunchy horror comedy and made a family friendly coming of age “scary” movie. It’s an entirely different genre.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I’m with you. 2016 may not compare to the original, but it was a solid comedy with a good heart. The bloody meltdown parts of the internet had over it was insane.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Holy fuck, how many of the things have they made? Jurassic fucking Park over here lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    JP series with chris pratt is also bad, but i dont see conservative complaining about that, oh becauses the one as the lead, and not someone J Lawrence. i bet they love him even more now that he identifies as a far right christian.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Yeah, that movie was so ass. My perfect summation of it. We rented it, my daughter picked it out. Like ten minutes in, she says something like, "This is so terrible, I am going to my room."

    Now, normally, she will just ignore whayever is on and play on her phone or whatever and ignore it, this, she actively wanted to flee from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It was actually impressive just how bad it was. It's like they were trying to make it unbearable to watch. The fact that it carried the name of an all-time classic made it so much worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I was reading your comments thinking, it wasn’t that bad guys. One quick google search revealed I was thinking about the 2021 movie and had completely blocked all memory of the 2016 one. You’re spot on, it was atrocious!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    If I remember right, the only good thing in it was Chris Hemsworthbseemed to be having a good time.

    Which is of course, an "awful" criticism on the surface because of course "You must think its woke because you only liked the guy's part of it."

    I actually think it could have worked with a better cast honestly. I know the original was basically all SNLpeople, but doing it again just made it really bleh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    i noticed that to, STD was one, the show sucked bad. they almost are selfaware, they said terrible writing but then said it is due to wokeness and having women in the show. SG1 was an oddball it got called woke/lib by both tankies and conservatives. right about lucifer in sandman being casted by gwendoline, shouldve been the way in mythology and comics. but comes up with wokeness as the reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Its how I pick media these days too. Now that SFA is over, what are we watching?

    Please don't make me get a Truth Social account to mine for our viewing list.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    There have been a few examples I can think of where they've called something woke and it was legit pretty mid or outright bad. But usually that's down to it being a game by committee by people who only interact with marvel level writing, like Dragon Age: Veilguard which is just shit or Mass Effect: Andromeda which honestly just kinda mid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I actually liked Andromeda (the story concept) the game play was dog shit. if they had fleshed out the combat a bit more, used a different game engine, and published it not as a Mass Effect IP but as a stand alone game... it would have been golden.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    it applied to all SCI fi show both pre-STD(DISCOVERY) thats what really got thier panties in a wad, when kurtzman made all the women have lead roles.SG1 wasnt spared either, as recently Invincible was called woke, just because the female general in coalition took command of the ship (the planet of ragnarrs) to refreeze the beasts.

    there was definitely a concerted effort around 2020(thats when woke became super prominent in comments of shows like star trek) around election time to illicit more voters to side with conservatives through propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Invincible was called woke, just because the female general in coalition took command of the ship

    And don't forget, Mark first GF is now black! The horror!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    i was going to mentioned that, since they race swapped her. sandman was another example of race and gender swapping people, Death was suppose to be a goth white chick, and LUCIFER was gwendoline instead of a blond white guy. they alway attribute terrible writing to DEI/WOKENESS

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago

    Pretty sure "woke DEI crap" is universally understood as pandering. And everyone is pissed at stories being written specifically to scream woke crap at you instead of just incorporating diversity in, as it fits the story itself, and moving on with a good show.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 96 points 7 months ago (28 children)

    It’s a silver lining to see Shatner using his platform for the greater good.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 7 months ago (19 children)

    Yeah, I always thought he was kind of a douche, but I guess his heart is in the right place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    I think Shatner is complicated because (a) he's 95 years old, and can't be expected to be fully "in touch," and (b) he has definitely had some questionable people handling his social media over the years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago* (14 children)

    Yeah, it's shatner so you one expects him to be crass, and you one forgets he was the first star trek captain. and agreed with the ideas being shown on screen (unlike, IDK, Barclay's actor)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Huh? What's up with Barclay's actor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Right wing propaganda guy. Dwight Sclutz

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Boy, do I wish I hadn't read this comment. This makes me sad to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    What really gets to me is that he's fucking Mung Daal in Chowder, whose actor is was a literal kid. God knows what kind of poison lies he fed that boy. I really liked him in chowder too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Jeffrey Hunter was the first Star Trek captain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realise the starring role of the TOS series , Captain Kirk was played by Jeffrey Hunter. How many episodes was he in?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Captain Christopher Pike was played by Jeffery Hunter in the first Star Trek series, but was only in the pilot or something before Shatner took the reins. If you were sincerely asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    If you were sincerely asking.

    not really. When people are thinking about their favourite captain, especially before the revival, Jeff was never in the running. Hell, Bakalar Bakula is barely in the running.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I recently learned that Shatner and Takei don't actually use social media and all the posts you see from them are just some employees that were instructed to speak in their style.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It’s possible on a regular basis.

    However, as with other high profile accounts, one expects that messages that are high profile would be cleared with the person under whose name the official account is made.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Not at all. Chapelle told that joke about hearing that "his" "official" Twitter account was having beef with Kat Williams' "official" account. During one show when both of them were in the audience, he went over to Kat and told him the situation - to which Kat replied, "wtf is Twitter?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I really dislike Takei's one (Jay Kuo) because of how shamelessly he uses it to promote his own substack sometimes.. and because of a specific substack post of his where he said "oh no it's so bad Arizona got abortion banned.. but there's a silver lining, maybe they'll learn to vote blue the next time" or some shit like that.

    +3M people losing their body autonomy and the first thing you think is "hey this can be a good thing for our campaign"?? fucking ghoul...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah. I wish people like him, sulu, and stephen king would abandon it already though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Exactly. Star Trek takes place in utopia - and the creators' version of utopia is one with equality, freedom, and respect for all. If someone's version of utopia doesn't align with this, I think that says a lot more about them than it does about how "woke" Star Trek is

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Their utopia also highly resembles communism as a classless, stateless society

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago*

    Yeah, and it shows how hard it is to build a utopia even when intentionally trying to remove class, when oligarchies are motivated to prevent that, and in a post-scarcity reality, which we don’t yet have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    i think what got thier panties in a wad was STD, because it had a certain demographic playing lead roles over men. then it became DOCTOR WHO, whittaker and then ncuti(but him mostly), why because a certain election was under way that year, while STD was in thier 1st/2nd season, and it annoyed the hell of cons with all the women in the lead roles and then they started attacking every trek video they see. Janeway wasnt SPARED TOO but that took years for them to use mental gymanstics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    “When did Star Trek get so woke?” — My idiot former boss.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    I believe it was also an old Shatner tweet (well, if memory serves, he technically asked when it got political) Surprised to see this shift from him. It’s a welcome one but I’m still not sure if I should trust this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    the gender ran across 4 series. DS9 had jadzia(other host) preferred women and shes a women still with those feelings, and another where a female dominant race from the gamma quadrant fled DS9 through the wormhomle, and a similar one on enterprise show(where the explosion disaster caused by the suliban), Genderless insectoid Xindi.

    Nutrek through kurtzman isnt very good and not very subtle with exposing mysogyny/genderphobia .

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 7 months ago (24 children)

    A few years back, I was speaking to a roommate. I complained that the (then) new Star Trek had forced diversity. He immediately shut me down, "Star Trek has ALWAYS been like that". He was a huge fan of Star Trek

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    Why would you even complain about that in the first place?

    People tend to think that "forced diversity" is something being pushed from the top, but the people who own Hollywood are literally paying money to the right wing who limits diversity.

    My personal belief is that there are simply a lot of homosexuals and trans people in the art world. Whether it be make up artists, actors or screenwriters, i think aaaaall of this is a lot more normal amongst creatives than it is among the regular population.

    So obviously, its gonna show up more in movies and shows, than in real life. Because the people making the art knows these actual people.

    People tend to forget when watching a movie, that just like when looking at a painting, they are in fact watching someone else art, and they are welcome to just not look at it, or find artists that more aligned with their bigoted views.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago

    yup its literally hollywood execs, doing rainbow/ diversity" capitalism , cons think its an agenda by hollywood which are traditionally right wing pushing it as we must include gays, womens, pocs as the forefront of movies and show to show society "they arnt racist", they only care because most viewers are left leaning , right wingers dont watch anything but copaganda type shows. you can tell hollywood is still pretty racist since they barely represent asians other than stereotypes. shang chi wasnt groundbreaking for asians , maybe for SImu liu, its stereotyping because he barely had any roles after that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -9 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    As a person of color I can tell you that white liberals limit diversity more than white conservatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    "I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: 'I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action'; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom." -- Martin Luther King Jr.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    He wasn't wrong. Racists didn't put Trump in the White House. Apathetic centrists and moderates did. And no, it's not just about him. Buy it's the one of the more salient example of modern moderates allowing horrible shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    There's the money conservative and the scared conservative. Scared conservative is racist. Money conservative only sees the colour of money

    Allowing for gradations for different levels of assholes, ofc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    its a variant of rainbow capitalism, i called "diversity " capitalism the execs push the race and gender swapping because the audience is mostly left leaning so they think it gives them more views on thier films or show. when in fact the audience dont care about it and some are irked they did this on purpose while making a shitty show.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Star Trek (TOS) never needed to BE about diversity, because it was set in a utopian future where racism, and sexism weren't problems anymore. You had an entire multi-racial cast on the bridge of a starship so just from THAT you knew that racism wasn't a problem in the future. There was no more war, poverty, disease or crime. Conflict only came from humanity's meetings with alien races.

    TOS Star Trek never needed to beat you over the head every 5 minutes with how gay someone was because that wasn't a problem in the 23rd century. Nobody gave a shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Now don't get me wrong, I think the best way for Trek to handle queer issues is to just put queer people on the bridge. A gay Riker equivalent or a trans woman who talks about her past with the same discomfort but honesty as how Picard talks about his is what I want. And in that vein I'm still on my first watch of TNG and it'll be a while before I get to nutrek.

    But I'm not going to pretend that to a certain portion of the population TOS wasn't seen as being overly preachy on race. But seeing as I haven't gotten to TOS yet either, I will say that in modern day I do think TNG was a bit preachy about disability and I'm glad they were.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Where do you consider TNG being preachy about disability? Not arguing, it's just been a while since I've watched it beginning to end and this might be something I failed to pick up on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Geordi's blindness is a plot point at least once in an episode that's basically exactly what people act like episodes involving queerness are. Where he has to hold a eugenicist's hand through accepting that he doesn't mind that he was born blind and that he even has some advantages thanks to his visor. Don't get me wrong, it was a very good episode, and people did need it laid out like that, but it's very much not the "we've moved beyond such concerns" in a way that say having a ranking officer use a wheelchair would be.

    I will say something they did right was that his visor gives him headaches. It's very in line with what folks with cochlear implants or very strong eyeglass prescriptions describe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Ah, that's fair, I was a child when I first watched the series so I don't think I ever really registered the visor as a disability given that being blind doesn't hinder him at all, besides the aforementioned headaches that rarely come up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Are you one of those people who believes Discovery had a coming out as nonbinary plot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›