wanna be a cop_

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Hot DAMN thats some good work right there. All the arguments right up front in an easy-to-scroll format.

    A+

    File that right next to my bookmark for Burn Down the American Plantation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    i live in a cop neighborhood

    they take all those in that list the exact opposite and as a sign of why they believe cops are better people than everyone else

    remember ... to overvalue oneself one only has to undervalue everyone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    ironically Seattle still feels like a cop city to me, lol

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago*

    well, yeah. police jobs pay better than private sector and get government benefits. best of both worlds, plus you get to murder and commit crimes with impunity. perfect if you have no soul.

    unfortunately i phrased it that way because it is not a crime here when police murder. this fucking country.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    lol "you can do better"

    that's the line from the Seinfeld when Jerry and George tell people "you can do better than him" in front of the boyfriend

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago
    39 comments in c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 90 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Fun fact, you can see that this poster is for Seattle.

    The police union has used its power to force the city to not allow more than about 24 responders on the "CARE" team, which is a team of non-police responders that are basically just well-equipped social workers with formal training that lets them incredibly effectively handle things like mental health emergencies, drug users, etc.

    They then put additional restrictions in place to make it even harder for those people to get dispatched to a scene, such as if any drugs are visible at all, if the person is "confrontational", if they're in a building or car, or if there's an "indication" they've committed any form of crime at all.

    Dispatchers also can't send the CARE team alongside police anymore.

    The police don't just do their jobs badly, they force the city to spend money on their high salary and high overtime wages to get worse results, instead of sending in actual professionals.

    ACAB.

    https://publicola.com/2026/02/24/police-contract-has-prevented-unarmed-crisis-responders-from-doing-their-jobs-care-chief-says/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    I fucken got stuck talking to a libertarian coworker yesterday who was all about negative enforcement. Dude truly believed we needed more punishment and more cops.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    There's a huge body of academic evidence showing that broadly policing is an ineffective intervention for crime. Including a huge study commissioned by the us government before the 84 crime bill.

    That we then passed anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Not just ineffective.

    Cops are the biggest criminals I've seen.

    Watch how many traffic rules they break.

    Watch how often they breach their own policies, and wear treasonous gangsign badges to show allegiance to the gang, not to the public and their professed duty.

    Last time I saw a couple cops, they had come to my house to tell me they were committing mail fraud, breach of duty of care, theft, dereliction of duty, and when I tried to report crimes to them, they then fled the crime scene.

    Not the worst I've had from them....

    Once, a gang of thugs broke into my home, tied me up, stole my medicine, and threatened to make me their prisoner for over a decade of being raped. And I could not call the cops on them, because they were the cops.

    Still recovering(?) from the PTSD from that, 21 years ago. What a waste of human potential they cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 36 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    This is why you punch them and let them know you’re actually helping them by doing negative enforcement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    Don't be a grammar cop.

    You can do better, so can Seattle.

    Less needless "corrections" that add nothing to conversations. More engaging in conversation

    Less being a stickler for no good reason. More being chill for once

    Less grammar cops Better communities

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Fewer people who care how language works.
    More people who can't speak their own language.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    If you're speaking it natively and correctly to your own understanding, you're not speaking it wrong, or unable to speak it. That assertion is asinine on its face. Languages change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Not all change of language is good.

    Read 1984 again if forgot why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Ah, you mean the book about a prescriptivist policy of grammar coming top-down from government, that one?

    And how the way that people rebelled was intentionally misuse of the rules in a "you didn't say I couldn't use it this way!", a form of descriptivism

    Read 1984, if forget why

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Less people enforce arbitrary outdated "rules"

    More people let language evolve like the living thing it is

    Less people care about prescriptivism outside of formal contexts

    More the language reflects reality rather than being left to stagnate and die

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    I actually agree with what you've written here, but not in this context. This IS a formal context where the recruitment poster in the image isn't trying to be clever or interesting or funny, which are all valid contexts for different uses of established language rules, they're just wrong. Additionally the OP comment here wasn't being rude by offering the correct word for the context, I saw it as offering assistance to someone forming their sentence incorrectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    It's not a formal context, it's very obviously written in a breezy and casual style, where attention-grabbing is more important than formalities

    The call-response format is short-long in stressing, which gives it a PUNCH that "fewer" would lose as well

    1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Feels more punchy than

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Also, it's not a recruitment poster, it's a political advocacy poster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    I'm all for this message, but the execution is bad in terms of actual advertising psychology. Most people will only glance at it for a mere moment, seeing a nice cop with a "you wanna be a cop?" and nothing more. This is the exact opposite of what the ad is trying to convey.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    They mean "fewer," not "less." Police are countable.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago*

    less cop, less overbloated gang UNION/benefits funding. the top 2 require alot more education and certification(masters level) than a cop, emts are just super- under paid.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Start paying EMT's like the pigs and maybe that's a choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    But if we DONT have COPS who will Prevent Crimes? Investigate Crimes? Stop Crimes? Arrest BLACK Children?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    My IQ's 30 points off from meeting the threshold to be a cop. :/

    And thus that'd be a daily/constant trigger for my illithiophobia among my colleagues if I were to become one.

    Nurses, Libraries, EMTs, yus, much better for the world.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago