wanna be a cop_
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

I actually agree with what you've written here, but not in this context. This IS a formal context where the recruitment poster in the image isn't trying to be clever or interesting or funny, which are all valid contexts for different uses of established language rules, they're just wrong. Additionally the OP comment here wasn't being rude by offering the correct word for the context, I saw it as offering assistance to someone forming their sentence incorrectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    It's not a formal context, it's very obviously written in a breezy and casual style, where attention-grabbing is more important than formalities

    The call-response format is short-long in stressing, which gives it a PUNCH that "fewer" would lose as well

    1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Feels more punchy than

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Also, it's not a recruitment poster, it's a political advocacy poster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments