all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

I haven't seen any positive response to DLSS5 except by people who literally only see shapes and colors when they look at art. IDK who thinks making random parts of scenes visually louder instead of the way the artist intended is an improvement.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    Here's an opinion: Whoever decided to reveal DLSS5 deserves a raise. By Nvidia's standards, that is. Everyone is talking about that instead of discussing Nvidia's engagement with Palantir. DLSS5 was a master stroke.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Over compression and blown out...sounds a lot like what they started doing to good audio 30 years ago!

    I see a future like today in the audio world. We have those of us who actually know good sound and have a trained ear (note, not talking about snake oil audio bs. My system is under a grand and blows away many systems 5x its price because I dont waste money on idiotic shit like cables )Then there are those who prefer a sausage waveform and clipping. And they are the masses. The same will happen with video games.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    was dlss ever worth it? It just seemed to make games run worse without any significant improvement to fidelity.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Absolutely but it depends on what kind of DLSS we're talking about, since nvidia uses the term to talk about multiple very different technologies. DLSS framegen can make things look smoother but increases latency and introduces visual artifacts. I would never turn it on for something like a first-person shooter, but I could maybe see myself using it in a game like Civ VII where a few extra milliseconds of latency isn't a big deal.

    The really important one though is DLSS upscaling. Back in the day if you ran a game at lower resolution (usually for performance reasons) and upscaled it it would look like shit. DLSS upscaling lets you do that and have it look almost as good as rendering it natively, as long as you don't push it too far. It didn't work super well when it was first released, but these days it looks great and can really improve performance.

    The benefits of DLSS yassification are questionable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    DLSS, FSR, XeSS, etc are all great for extending the life of older cards. Unfortunately, the GPU manufacturers found this out pretty early on and keep updating the technology to be more and more performance expensive, meaning you need a newer card to get any benefit.

    Therefore no, the new versions are not really worth anything other than artificially boosting your framerate, which at that point just dropping the render resolution will probably give you more or less the same result.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    DLSS4 also used "AI"

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I just hope I wont get any more Chainsaw Man spoilers shoved down my throat. (I have most mangas in my shelf but didn't get around to read most of them yet.) It's unfortunate I can't discuss the series with fans on the internet because the always post unprompted major spoilers. /rant end

    Fuck AI though. Useful tech but society has ruined it in record time. And by society I mean mostly tech CEOs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The future is coming whether we fight it or not. High schoolers fuckin love AI slop. Eventually, all of us who remembered the old days of human created media will die, and the people who grew up with slop being the only thing they know will take our place, and our societal standards will lower more and more.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Anecdotally, I've heard that many high schoolers hate AI slop, with "AI" frequently being used as a pejorative to describe low effort, low quality productions lacking sincerity or ingenuity.

    Granted, "high schoolers" aren't a monolith, but I don't buy that the future is already written, and I'd urge everyone to fight back and remain optimistic instead of giving in to dark visions of what might be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    Honestly people are making a big deal out of this but I don't get it, the time for the outrage was when both AMD (2023) and Nvidia (2022) introduced frame generation into their respective upscalers. It was always gonna be downhill from there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    I mean, lots of people were and still are annoyed by frame gen too - especially with the deceptive way nvidia uses it in their marketing (claiming a 5070 will be as fast as a 4090 when it actually just makes more fake frames).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    gemini seems pretty sure the image is ai generated.

    SpoilerI think gemini is wrong on all points, and this is actually from an anime, even though I am not sure which .

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -12 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I haven't seen any negative response to DLSS5 except by people who literally only see timeless, unerring holy art when they look at anything. IDK who thinks making games visually enhanced over the artist' limited tools/time/abilities is a deterioration.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Referring to the slop filter as visual enhancement is being very generous. The AI doesn't know shit about why things look the way they look. Can't wait to play Deep Rock Galactic but with the lighting all fucked up, despite that being an extremely important game mechanic that the AI doesn't know anything about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Referring to technological progress as slop is being very predictably monotonous. AI isn't exclusively a black box. There are tunings and imposed considerations that can be made so the AI DOES know about anything it needs to. The technology is only in preview form, and you seemingly expect immediate perfection, rather than incremental progress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    If it actually looked good sure but it just cranks up the contrast and puts a shitty Instagram filter over the characters. I don't care how delusional you are I just can't understand how you'd think that wouldn't ruin whatever the character is supposed to actually look like. In one of their own examples the character just had a family member die, they aren't wearing makeup for a reason, not that DLSS cares so yassified grieving woman go brrr

  • source
  • parent
  • 16 comments in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 34 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    not here for sure, but Lemmy is not exactly a reflection of the general population

    people are starting to grow numb to gen AI, and people have grown numb to worse things so it's not exactly going to get undone easily

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

    Honestly, I have not seen anyone who values art "be ok with" generative AI.
    The only people who think it is even remotely cool are lazy programmers with no friends.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It is a lot less worrying once you remember that basically every AI company is subsidizing their customers with investor money and when the customers have to start paying what it actually costs to do anything, the usage will plummet.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Or that Gen AI is being accepted to mean general AI instead of the actual term of generative AI. Which isn't even AI at all. It's Markov chains all the way down.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    On the bus I see people unironically sitting there watching fully AI generated shortform content. It's sad.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    ...shoved down our throat to the point that people are starting to be ok with it

  • source