all 69 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 56 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yep. Survived such an idiot.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 8 months ago

    Many of these "business geniuses" do the following:

    • buy struggling business cheap
    • reduce expenses (biggest expense is always salaries, so fire a lot of people)
    • on paper, the business is making money (while the rest of the staff frantically try to survive without enough manpower and with a lot of loss on knowledge and experience)
    • sell doomed business before it collapses (remember: on paper, it looks healthy)
  • source
  • [–] 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I love that the guy’s tattoos change constantly:

    • snake on right arm
    • snake moves to the left arm
    • apple gets bite taken from it as snake is now a real creature

    So many little details in this comic!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    What... The heck... Is going on in that factory!? What's with all the random changes and references?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago

    This is how private equity MBAs have ruined everything.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago

    So many oligarchs and wannabe oligarchs to choose from...

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    URGENT: ALWAYS COMPLETE YOUR SHIFT AND CLEAN YOUR AREA BEFORE FIGHTING DEMONIC FORCES

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    Thomas Pickety lays out the mechanics of this transference in Capitalism In The Twenty-First Century.

    He establishes a comparison between the domestic rate of economic growth (typically measured in GDP) relative to the average return on investment (typically measured by bond rates or annualized stock market asset inflation). He finds that when GDP < ROI, wealth aggregates into the hands of a small pool of elites. Meanwhile, when GDP > ROI, wealth diffuses to the general public (the so-called Trickle Down Economics promised by Reagan).

    These leveraged buyouts are only possible when private lenders can generate a compounding return in fictitious assets that outpaces a return investing in material capital and labor improvements. And the compounding return is, at its heart, a consequence of unpaid wages, bad debt, and unaccounted depreciation.

    Picketty concludes that the most straightforward remedy to rebalancing GDP and ROI is to tax capital gains. This effectively forces down the ROI, while redirecting cash flow to public investments that boost GDP without triggering an inflationary spiral.

    But what he can't answer is how to address the social dynamic that allows taxes to fall and predatory business practices to accumulate. Media manipulation, imperialist plundering, and the exploitation of domestic lower social castes can't be solved with tax policy. Who actually stops the Business Genius from wrecking the factory? What are the real material functions of the economy being controlled? And how do a handful of individuals successfully rent-seek from them without triggering a public revolt?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    A wild Homer Simpson appears

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    I live how the title is misspelled.

    Edit: My own typo above is unintentional, but too funny to fix.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    I bought the company and I will short the stock.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    "THIS TINY TEXT IS WAY TOO SMALL TO BE READ, SORRY!"

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    Classic plot of most of the Reddit revenge and Youtube channels.

  • source
  • So there's Homer, Dr. Bunsen Honeydew, and Brain (From Pinky and the Brain).

    Did I miss any other reference?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    What are we going to do tonight CEO?

  • source
  • [+] -48 points 8 months ago (42 children)

    This looks and feels like AI slop

  • source
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    Which is impressive considering how many background details and consistent things are across the panels pretty much guaranteeing that it isn't.

    Literally the worker has an apple tattoo that gets eaten over the course of the comic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    The firt three panels are a disconnected mess that spans several distinctly unconnected locations despite seemingly being a single short encounter between two characters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    You've never had a walk and talk through a work site that had different rooms?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Not across an entire site in three simple sentences no...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Oh, so you have to have things be completely literal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    No i was being facetious to your obviously sarcastic comment.

    You obviously don't agree this has AI-vibes, fair enough we don't have to be aligned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    You need a vibe check if you’re thinking this is AI. The level of detail and in-jokes scattered throughout are definitely something that AI couldn’t pull off right now. Look at the snake and the apple, it moves between frames eating the apple, that’s not something it’s going to effectively do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 64 points 8 months ago* (7 children)

    Every day the feeling grows that calling legitimate art AI slop has done even more harm to artists than actual AI slop.

    I very much doubt that AI would have included Homer Simpson, Brain and several other characters as well as tons of tiny yet legible text as easter eggs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -26 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    AI would include whatever the person using it tells it to.

    It's fine, I seem to be in the clear minority getting an AI-vibe from this from the downvote brigading I've received.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    "Brigading" implies off-channel coordination. I don't think that's really what you're suggesting is happening here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago

    Lol brigading as if we aren't just reducing the visibility of an incorrect and poorly communicated opinion in this comment section.

    Cause nobody can just admit they're wrong or accept that people are ok to deny your visibility. It is fake internet points.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    I downvote every comment that's accusing something of being AI. Either it's true, in which case the comment doesn't change anything, or it's false, in which case it's hurtful. The upside is not worth the downside.

    I want it to become a norm that accusing something of being AI is considered rude.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    Not all slop is AI slop. You're jumping at shadows, calm down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Well I am certainly in the minority here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Certainly a minority, but not quite alone. I see comments like yours a LOT.

    Personally I'd prefer seeing people call out slop because it's shitty, not based on how it was made, but with that I guess I'm the minority Β―\_(ツ)_Β―

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    That's exactly what I'm saying. Slop doesn't have to be AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    No, Klear didn't, that was a different user.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    when claiming something is generated by AI, you should probably look at the image for more than 5 seconds and probably know what an AI generated comic looks like

    claiming something made by a real person is AI generated can be hurtful

  • source
  • parent
  • AI is pretty consistently bad at small background text and expressive hand gestures and this image has quite a lot of both.

    The box in the first panel is a good example. The text "caution: irrelevant prop" written on it becomes clearer when you zoom in; for things like that, AI usually makes sort of a word shaped tangle that turns to mush when you zoom in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Because there are random hands and faces all over the place, random cartoon characters and every frame had no connection with the next frame except the to foreground characters?

    This thing is chaos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments