all 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Of course we would! How dare you assume the same rules apply to us as to you, filthy plebe?

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago

    Joel Tenenbaum must be feeling pretty silly for not thinking to argue in court that he downloaded mp3s for a business instead of personal use.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I was moderately in the "piracy is stealing" camp until both this shit happened, and EVERYTHING got enshittified.

    Fuck em.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I have always been in both camps.

    I have always held to a strict code of, "make no profit".

    I share what I have, and sell nothing. not even at cost.

    IP rights are important, but there is zero harm sharing IP freely. it's no different than watching a movie from a public library.

    Once you start selling though, is when you cross a line of profiting off of someone else's hard work.

    AI crossed that line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Oh I'd never sell stuff like that. I never even thought that was a thing. I guess that's how we are different from billionaire scum.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 32 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    Why is it stealing in the first place!? Humanity is built on sharing, cooperation and community. Especially knowledge only profits from being shared.

    I'm not for LLM garbage, I'm against IP.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Because current material conditions require that workers hold a copyright on their productions lest they be denied compensation required for survival under our capitalist system.

    You don’t stop paying rent just because housing should be a right.

    We all know what the better system should be, but we need to get there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    The biggest problem is that workers generally dont hold those rights, the people they contract with do.

    These laws aren't protecting workers, they're protecting corporations, they're protecting capital. Unless that changes, IP laws are so broken there's no point in honoring them except to avoid punishment.

    Its basically better to go around them and support workers directly than to try and give them a pittance through their taskmasters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    You don’t stop paying rent just because housing should be a right.

    Maybe you don't. They call me Papa Squat for a reason

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Anything that is a right still costs money (or someone's time and effort). It should be affordable, or subsidized by the government (paid by taxes) but nothing is free. Education, Healthcare, housing, clean water, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    i would be against IP iff society took care of everyone and authors and inventors could write and design and not worry about material needs.

    also if they could just get dune buggies whenever they wanted. when society does that, i'll be in favor of abolishing IP law. until then, IP law provides me with dune buggy money via pathetic royalties from the cds i recorded. i get pennies a year dammit. pennies!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Humanity is built on sharing, cooperation and community.

    Was.

    Yes, we all benefit when knowledge is shared. Until gathering that knowledge is cost-free, there's a compensation requirement for expertise.

    And any point in time when corps want to take the knowledge and lock it up to monetize it, we especially need to bring out intellectual property laws to keep our knowledge open and free.

    World book, Webster's dictionary and the Bible are user-pay repositories of very curated knowledge, for instance. If you're basing your opinion on these as mechanisms for sharing our collective experience, understand they don't freely share free info -- that both freedoms aren't present.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It is not the sum total. There is so much more that was never written on the internet. In my profession, I use AI for scripting and web searching but offers next to no information or help with my main gig.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Imagine all the knowledge we gained and lost before we invented writing. Some of it probably got relearned, or survived orally until someone wrote it down, but there’s undoubtedly human knowledge that has ceased to exist. Like how to hunt mammoths. At best we speculate and use clues to reconstruct, but we still don’t know in a manner that would have been taught generation to generation among people who relied on them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    I will steal that font though

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    Nice t-shirt design, where can I download it?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The sum total of human experience should be free to do with which any of us desires, free from gatekeeping laws created by the owning class in order to exploit the fruits of the laborer’s efforts.

    However, considering the current material conditions of the world requiring ownership rights in order to provide for creators, it’s quadruple fucked up that the owning class is taking it all in order to replace those who created it while destroying the world it inhabits.

    I’m all for copyrights if we can use them to guillotine the establishment, legally speaking of course.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    It's fine to use the sum total of human knowledge for an AI chat bot, but then that AI chat bot is everyone's chat bot and you shouldn't be able to charge for it. Sure you put some work into it, but so did every other human ..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    That anti-piracy campaign inserted in every DVD release aged like milk.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Well........... I wouldn't tell you about it. Please do not read our eula, there is nothing to see there about us getting all the rights to whatever you put on our servers.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    We can remake the last 2 seasons of Game of Thrones using Game of Thrones itself as training data.

    We can make Bran fly out of another window.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    You have me thinking of how awesome it would be if something like Our Robocop Remake was made for Game of Thrones. The movie was split up into scenes and different indie directors did each scene. It was disjointed and hilarious. I want to see that scene you mentioned with Bran except he starts flying after he gets pushed out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -1 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • Although I agree with the stuff about written things being contradictory, but I think your comment is a little reductive about machine learning.

    Machine learning has rapidly transformed many areas, here’s a few:

    • Object recognition
    • Facial recognition
    • Medical imaging
    • Language translation
    • Speech recognition
    • Text generation
    • Drug Discovery
    • Genomics

    The list is rather endless really. Take text recognition and computer vision. People that are blind can now wear Meta (shit company I know) glasses and actually go shopping, pick up items and have the labels read to them. Thats fucking awesome.

  • source
  • parent