"SWATGPT you killed the wrong person"
"You're absolutely right, that was my bad and I'll do better next time"
"SWATGPT you killed the wrong person"
"You're absolutely right, that was my bad and I'll do better next time"
We will build technical safeguards
We all know that 1) they will rush it into use before that and 2) their safeguards don't work
We will build technical safeguards
after we have unleashed it on the general public and have a clearer picture what to safeguard against.
So Anthropic was requesting the DoW to include two (and only two) prohibited uses in their contract:
My understanding was… that’s all Anthropic was asking for, any other use was acceptable. That’s why the deal wasn’t going through.
Now, Anthropic’s contract has ended, and the same day OpenAI is the DoW’s golden child?
Something tells me OpenAI’s contract does not have those prohibited uses in it.
Probably not
Amodei said in an interview that the DoW altered their contract to appear to compromise, so that it looked like they were allowing Anthropic to have those limits. But that legalese accompanying the updates rendered that text pointless. Basically, "We won't use Claude for domestic surveillance and full automated killing, unless we really want to." My guess is OpenAI signed the exact same contract and just pretended not to understand the distinction.
Sam Altman: "I will gladly kill for money."
And this right here is how Sam Altman survives the AI bubble bursting.
Now they're a part of critical national infrastructure.
Exactly. He’d kill his mother if it keeps him employed. There are no principles at OpenAI other than the pursuit of cash.
lol, no. their cash burn is still completely unsustainable. Altman himself will be fine when music stops, but the whole endgame with these tech grifters is bagging the US taxpayer (which'll happen when banks start going underwater, and have foreclosed assets they have conveintent buyers already lined up
The DOW displayed a deep respect for safety
lmao what
Dude. It's SAFE War. The government promised?
Is that why they're nuclear bombs? Because they're so small and can't hurt anyone?
The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.
And you just made it worse. Congratulations.
Deep respect for safety? When I was in the army they made us do all sorts of wild unsafe shit. And we were worth millions to them via our training. How safe do you think someone who they haven't spent money on will be?
Also the department of war jingoism is fucking annoying. Can't wait until adults are back in charge of the military.
The world is a dangerous place, so I'll be here to make sure it gets even more dangerous!
Fuck you Sam, burn in hell you Nazi wannabe
"to achieve the best possible outcome"
For who? Even the people you're murdering?
"Ensure our models behave as they should"
We built a box that says "kill all brown people" and will act shocked that that would be it's solution to everything. It's so SMART!! It MUST just be the case that Muslims are violent and bad. Why else would our AI be so good willing to exterminate village after village?
Some pieces of wood, a rope, and a sharp blade is the solution to all our problems.
Oh no domestic mass surveillance? I don’t believe you…and if I did, you’re still happy to help mass surveillance everywhere else in the world?
Man, I wish I knew how to organize people against these ghouls.
He's calling it the department of war.
No need to read on, that says it all.
The phrasing is actually non-committal. The promise is too big to mean anything or be actionable. They love to throw hifalutin' shit like that around because it costs them nothing. Never have I heard one of them specify what AI can really do, and how exactly it "serves humanity".
"We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should"
You... you mean you didn't have technical safeguards before???
Ol' Sammy saw an opportunity for some of those cash-packed government contracts and leapt at the chance, heedless of the fact his product will (will) one day slaughter non-combatants. After all, dead civilians can always be shovelled into the 'acceptable losses' column, can't they?
Amazing how their "AI safety" efforts never mentioned how dangerous it is to let a private for-profit Psychopath leader/organization have control of a super-mind, or what would happen if said Psychopath gives that power to the biggest Fascist Psychopath sh*t-nation in world history..
Boycott the scumbag, boycott US and all other tech-lords, or just rich/powerful Unts. Boycott all their favorite/recommended ideologies - they work only for them and create sh*t for everybody else !
Damn your AI’s
Instead of attacking a technology, perhaps attack the powerful Capitalist shitters that misuse that technology. Here we have an obvious Psychopath that are a direct cause of harm. A perfect target for your anger, yet you still chose to attack the tools they use. Come on man..
top 39 comments