The Kings Demands (files.mastodon.social)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 

Source

Alt Text: The cartoon illustrates the problem of water use in the AI age: a farmer's child and his mother are pumping a little water from a well for their daily use. Two knights in armor, transporting a large, spherical water container on wheels, come by and say, "The King wishes to make more avatars of himself as a Ghibli character."
In the background, a castle sits enthroned on a hill. The cartoon illustrates the excessive water consumption required for AI model queries.

The Kings Demands

all 52 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

The king wants everyone to make a ghibly avatar and thank him for it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago*
    • humanity builds really big computers to solve problems
    • the big computers use a lot of water to cool themselves
    • the water evaporating from the computers is messing up the weather
    • the computers end up never even solving the problems they were made to solve

    this is just fucking rain world

  • source
  • [–] -5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Where was the outrage - and where IS it still - about PCs and circuit manufacturing that allowed the computing revolution to occur? The negative externalities have always been kids getting cancer, growing up scavenging metals from landfills in other countries. Whole generations of people.

    Just about everything we do has negative externalities like that. Plastic recycling, textile production, the labor used to build houses and harvest crops in the US.

    I'm not trying to tu quoque anyone here, because we should be able to criticize things even though we participate in those or other problematic issues. But it seems like the AI hatred is so strong on this site, and it's absent any other hatred and outrage that could have long been a focal point up until now. We get it, you hate AI, which has been around for a few years in LLM form and hasn't been perfected yet, even though consumer electronics companies have still not managed to meet their environmental goals after decades, and you're certainly using those devices to your hearts content.

    Sometimes I think Lemmy should just be renamed "We fucking hate AI and will never budge on that."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I honestly think that it's really misplaced. Like, yes, AI is the reason e.g. RAM prices skyrocketed, but not by itself, it's because of companies having gargantuan demand that's higher than RAM companies can produce, so they crank up the prices to stop them. It's just how economies in bubbles work. And AI is stealing people's art not because it's sentient and wants to harm humanity (yet 😶) but because it profits people that operate it. It's just human greed, repackaged™.

    I really liked this video about it by diinki, highly recommend watching it.

    Also, just a little bit of nihilistic off-topic: don't hate anything that bad. Like, I understand that it is really easy and reasonable to hate AI. But this is kinda too much, and it will devour you. Meditate kids. We know AI is bad, we don't need you telling us that, go do things you actually like (and what I, as an average user may want to see e.g. in this community) instead of spreading hatered online.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 9 months ago (19 children)

    why are you consuming water for your AI?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    AI data centers use a fuckton of water. And before you say self host, this comic is directed at the other 99.9% of consumers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (8 children)

    I understand they use water in a closed loop for cooling, but... that's a closed loop. It isn't consuming water. Where did you get the idea that it was?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Let's start with this - where do you think the heat goes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    I think it goes into a pipe filled with a coolant that is circulated into a cooler medium like a lake or even just the air.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    That's shifted from AI to data centers in general, and most of what they're complaining about is the power generation. I live in Ontario, we get our electricity from nuclear and hydro.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Do you think that AI doesn't use data centers? What do you think that the huge surge in building data centers is for?

    Literally at the top of the article I linked:

    With larger and new AI-focused data centers, water consumption is increasing alongside energy usage and carbon emissions.

    Also from the article:

    A medium-sized data center can consume up to roughly 110 million gallons of water per year for cooling purposes, equivalent to the annual water usage of approximately 1,000 households. Larger data centers can each “drink” up to 5 million gallons per day, or about 1.8 billion annually, usage equivalent to a town of 10,000 to 50,000 people.

    And worse:

    Data center water usage closely parallels energy usage and carbon emissions. As data centers use more energy for their typical data center operations and to meet AI requests, they consume larger amounts of water to cool their processor chips, so as to avoid overheating and potential damage. Similarly, as energy use increases in data centers, so do carbon emissions.

    So, no, it's very much not only about the power for the data centers, although that is one component. And it's fantastic that you live in an area with renewable hydro power, but that doesn't help data centers built in areas that aren't served by renewables.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    I think it’s damning that both the account you’re referring to and the one I was arguing with earlier are both likely to be bots, paid shills, or both trying to spread disinformation about how harmful and wasteful AI data centers are!

    Who wants to trade away clean water and land to shitty AI facilities? I mean, except for oligarchs who want to cover the world in data centers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Not sure if you're serious, but cooling down servers consumes water.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Why does it consume water? Isn't it in a closed loop?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    It would be, if AI companies cared at all about anything but their wallet.

    They also use a fuckton of electricity, many sources of electricity consume water.

    They also require a fuckton of electronics, which require water to be manufactured.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I'm still not understanding how this is a water problem. Even in an open loop system, where do you think the water goes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The same place where every other form of water consumption goes: to the water cycle.

    If your argument is "that evaporated water will just rain again" then you're arguing that water consumption is not real, and people should not care about wasting water.

    That is not true. Most of the water of the water cycle is in the ocean. When you consume water, you are turning 100% high value fresh water into mostly low value salt water.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I've yet to see any actual evidence that any significant number of people are using evaporative cooling, and not just what everyone else uses when liquid cooling electronics - a closed loop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -30 points 9 months ago (26 children)

    This is false. Used to be true, but nowadays the big AI companies use closed-loop water cooling systems. No evaporation.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (22 children)

    Let’s see some reputable sources with these big claims.

    This is also not to mention the other tack on effects of data centers in communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [+] -23 points 9 months ago (21 children)

    Sure thing.

    "Proton VPN is operated by Proton AG, which values transparency and sustainability. Its unlimited data means fewer interruptions and wasteful reconnections" - Green City Times

    https://www.greencitytimes.com/the-best-free-vpn-for-eco-conscious-users/

    Not to mention that Proton is mainly based in Switzerland. According to their website, their data centers are housed in former military bases.

    "Our critical infrastructure, like our Secure Core VPN servers, is housed in secure data centers or on former military bases. Using these locations prevents anyone from being able to tamper with our servers." - Proton's own website

    https://protonvpn.com/features/physical-security

    They also offer their services for free rather than pushing users towards paid tiers. Unlimited data on every tier. Not something you see very often these days.

    Not to mention that Proton has been autited before and all of their claims regarding how they operate have held up in court.

    And considering Proton's reputation of Customer > Profit, it's not exactly surprising that their methods are ethical. For years they have been one of the few internet companies who don't harvest your data and prioritize money.

    I know that Proton isn't an AI company because I have been using their services for years. Long before this AI bubble was ever a thing. They only released Lumo last year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago (15 children)

    Sure thing

    Proceeds to not give a single source supporting original claims.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 9 months ago (14 children)

    I'm confused. I originally stated that Proton uses renewable green energy. Then I cited a source stating that the company values sustainability and their unlimited data means fewer wasteful reconnections. What more do you want? Want me to fly you out to Geneva so that you can see it for yourself?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    I see you are confused. Let me help you. Here is your original claim:

    Nowadays the big AI companies use closed-loop water cooling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Okay, fine:

    "Oracle is committed to helping communities understand the impact of its new AI data centers, starting with details on how our cooling works and what that means for local water. In short, at our AI infrastructure data centers—including upcoming ones in New Mexico, Michigan, Texas, and Wisconsin—we plan to deploy a variety of cooling methods like closed-loop cooling that do not rely on continuous consumption of potable water. These are deliberate engineering decisions designed with local communities in mind."

    "A third approach is what many of us have in our homes, particularly in warmer climates; air conditioning. An air conditioner is a closed-loop system, because the cooling fluid inside it circulates in a sealed loop and is reused. Data centers can use the same basic idea at larger scale."

    Source - https://www.oracle.com/news/announcement/blog/closed-loop-cooling-in-oracle-ai-data-centers-2026-02-09/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    They "plan to do it". They are not doing it. Try again.

    Also, it's oracle, their word means nothing. Them "planning" is just either "tell them we're gonna do it and just don't do it" or "we have to have an alternative plan in case the government grows some balls and regulates us".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    It's a growing trend in the AI industry through.

    Consider this:

    IF, Oracle follows through with that plan, other AI companies feel the pressure. If Oracle follows through with it, AWS, Azure, Google, and Meta look worse if they aren't disclosing or doing the same. OpenAI (which uses Azure) and Anthropic will also be dragged into that spotlight.

    If Oracle says:

    "We're not using your drinking water"

    then lawmakers and residents in other regions will demand local data centers do the same.

    AI infrastructure is insanely power and cooling hungry, and with growing backlash over water and energy use, companies can't afford to be sloppy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I see you got confused again. Let me display your original statement:

    Nowadays the big AI companies use closed-loop water cooling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    You already said that and I already responded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, you responded with something that doesn't support your original claim at all.

    What you are trying to do is called moving the goalpost.

    If you acknowledge that your original claim is bullshit and want to move the goalpost, it's fine, but you have to say that you're doing so.

    Like this:

    Yeah, I originally said that they're doing that nowadays, but after some research, I have found that my claim has no basis in truth. However, I found this post from oracle that I want to discuss about.

    Then sure, I can choose to engage with this new goalpost or not. But I refuse to argue with a moved goalpost if you don't even admit that you moved it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    You know what, you're right. I did move the goalposts and then doubled down out of ego. I let my pride get the better of me.

    I will admit that I originally made a claim with no credible evidence. This was wrong of me and I will not continue to dig myself into a hole.

    Thank you for calling that out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Read my other comment.

    It’s a disingenuous answer.

    Why can’t you cite OpenAI or any other major players?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Because OpenAI have never disclosed what kind of cooling they use. They're a bad example and do not support the point I was making.

    Not to mention that a lot of articles regarding OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google are heavily biased. Look up "OpenAI Energy Consumption" and you'll see several articles from different authors with titles using the same keywords. It reeks of SEO Spam. Not very helpful when you're looking for a reliable source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    OpenAI have never disclosed what kind of cooling they use

    You mean one of the main big AI companies? The ones you claimed use closed loop in your initial comment with no sources to back it up?

    Maybe don't make unverifiable claims, yeah?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    So you used one example from a company who is primarily not an AI company and doesn’t have data centers in the US, where the majority of water-consuming, community-destroying data centers are? Nor any other country where AI companies are exploiting their labor?

    Whose supply are you high on and how much are they paying you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Who said anything about the U.S? The discussion is about AI data centers using water which is harmful for the environment. I used Proton as an example because while they aren't primarily an AI company, they are very eco friendly, and they happen to run their own generative AI service.

    Nobody specified that this is a region-specific issue. You brought it up, so don't make me look like the idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    You’re cherry picking and I think you’re aware of that, given you only use Proton as an example.

    What they’re claiming isn’t false and it’s a good reflection of what’s happening globally.

    Don’t be ridiculous. Who trained your model?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    "Don't be ridiculous. Who trained your model?"

    I don't entertain conversations where i'm being talked down to. If you want to try again with respect, let me know. Otherwise, we're done here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    respect is reciprocal and demands honest dialogue between people.

    you ignored that requirement when you specifically attempted to move the goal from "AI data centers" to just "data centers". you didn't stop there either, you then attempted to gaslight everyone into thinking that this was acceptable. surprise, it's not.

    you get what you give, and you gave bullshit. time to settle your tab and eat your bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Nitpick: Microsoft and Oracle do it after initial fill intake, which as they increase the number of compute will mean needing to take in more water. Maybe one or two startups have the infrastructure capital to do it to.

    The rest are operating on dance-by-moonlight investor money and are absolutely still using outsourced data centers that rely on evaporative cooling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Fair point. I have used Proton's Lumo AI in the past. As far as i'm aware, their data centers mainly use air cooling and are powered by 100% green energy. Though it's a relatively small model. Proton isn't an AI company, and Lumo isn't their primary source of revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 12 points 8 months ago*

    The actual source is War and Peas. Hilarious webcomic. Support the artists if you can.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    AI systems themselves don’t inherently require large amounts of water. The water use comes from data center cooling design choices. Closed-loop liquid cooling systems can minimize water consumption, and large bodies of water like lakes, rivers, or the sea can serve as effective heat sinks.

    So, high water usage is not a technical necessity of AI. It's just cheaper and easier to ignore mother nature. Especially when you are in a race against the other AI companies.

    If the US had not given up on saving the climate, laws for environmental protection could have helped.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    I like this sentiment, but why are they queuing for the pump with a water jug already full with water?

  • source