And yet not a single person involved is being persecuted, bizarre...
post
Entire intelligence agencies will try to hack into your communications to ensure that cat does not resembles supreme commander. At the same time ignoring that dude which paid 5 bucks in taxes, has private island and absolutely not sus traffic from all over the world.
They had hard evidence of the Epstein classes crimes for DECADES.
At this point it should be self evident that the global intelligence community — likely including the agencies responsible for CSAM — are corrupt to their core and all compromised by the Epstein class of lawless billionaire psychopaths. It's highly likely Epstein and Trump's entire pedo sex trafficking ring was created by American/Israeli intelligence orgs to extort and blackmail globally, considering Ghislaine Maxwells dad was so high up that every living Israeli PM attended his funeral; some giving speeches alluding to his espionage.
Just like the police, these secret police exist to protect and defend capital. Capital IS "national security". They don't give a shit about laws, morality, democracy, or any of the other virtue signals Hollywood et al perpetuate. If they did, they wouldn't have ignored the evidence about hundreds of billionaire pedophiles, for DECADES.
I hate how logical this conclusion is.
the agencies responsible for CSAM — are corrupt to their core
No. They mostly do good work. I don't believe the people going to the island were generally passing around large amounts of CSAM sourced publicly, like forums or Reddit.
I'm so tired of people just taking the vibes they want from words and ignoring the meaning of full sentences. It's a form of illiteracy.
I get that we're angry.
If our most top secret entities are corrupted by pedophiles — have enabled and protected pedophiles for decades — what are the chances that other high-profile secretive targets, like the agencies that deal with CSAM, are not?
We're talking about a tool that has been proposed for client-side scanning of every computer. You really think these people wouldn't plan to get involved to ensure their own devices are excluded, or any logs that relate to them never get passed onto other law enforcement?
Open sores software? Ouch, sounds painful.
Mitch Webber's original email to him was essentially "yeah you're golden, fuck as many minors as you like, just bring them to another state first". And he still seems to have kept his job at (checks notes) an antisemitism group.
...what would happen if one were to transport a minor for sex — or transport oneself with the intent to have sex with a minor — into a state in which the age of consent is below eighteen (assuming the minor is above the age of consent in the given state)? And your intuition was right. The answer is that there is no violation of law.”
Let's be clear: everyone has a right to be represented by a lawyer in court, and we shouldn't judge lawyers for defending rapists because they're literally their job. But that's not what's happening here; this is him actively helping Epstein figure out the best way to rape children.
he still seems to have kept his job at (checks notes) an antisemitism group.
to be clear, this is a group for prevention of antisemitism and not a group who aims to be antisemitic, right?
“Antisemitism” has been redefined to mean opposition to the genocide of Palestinians.
well, don't stoop to their level. innocent jews still exist.
innocent jews still exist.
Absolutely, and I'd say even the majority. Sadly, the non-innocent ones have just devalued the definition of antisemitism so harshly that it cannot be used anymore without the assumption of bad connotation. I would recommend coming up with a new, more specific term that can't be used as a genocide shield.
Indeed, and the word doesn't fit anyway. Arabs are a semetic peoples. Bigotry takes many forms, but idk if hating a country's actions would fit into any of them in an honest definition. It's not xenophobia to oppose the actions of a government, I don't know what type of bigotry would even be close.
Because opposing official actions of a country, is not bigotry. Opposing the actions of a people, is not bigotry under any reasonable definition unless you are opposing it because of whom they are.
It’s just fucked that in a time where Nick Fuentes is getting mainstream airtime, organizations which claim to fight antisemitism are often more concerned with justifying Gaza.
there are people like Ben Shapiro that are on the same side as those bastards while emphasizing the "JUDEO" part of "JUDEO-Christian values" which , btw, is a term that has been engineered specifically to exclude islam out of the group of "Abrahamic religions", and/or to shove jews into the same bucket as the majority when "christian values" would be used instead.
it's fucking dog whistles all the way down.
Ostensibly, yes. As far as I can tell from their entry in influencewatch they also do something called "pro-Israel legal advocacy", but I don't know what that is. Either way it's not a great look having Epstein's consigliere on board.
Israel is pretty antisemitic. They kill lots of semitic arabs. And pro-israel groups tend to condone or excuse all that semite-killing, which is pretty antisemitic.
Legal advocacy for Israel is likely very dark stuff, to name a few possibilities here, the new anti protest laws states passed around 2018 deserve mention along with their campaigns to turn the opposition to big money and Israel into domestic terrorists. They have laws on the tamer end that cancel the bill of rights and make it against the law to support the boycott movement. Some just for state contracts, but some go farther, either way it's punishing 1st amendment protected activity.
The advocacy can be connected to their pursuit of critics under accusations of supporting terrorism and financing, and advocacy can be pressuring prosecutors, politicians, judges, the media, etc. to take the position that there is a terror angle. At which point they could take all of their assets, arrest everyone tangentially involved, seize those tangential peoples' assets, get them all fired, could file rico to boot, private or public and expand it out further with a friendly judge.[
There are also new laws from around 2018 that illegalize protest. These were orchestrated by fossil fuel companies in response to oil project protests and the like mostly. A lot of the more shitholier states passed them. Some, I think AZ might be one, it was reported in the Intercept I could find it, make organizers responsible for anything and everything that happens at a protest. There was a lot more to them than that. Impeding critical infrastructure is like a serious felony if not domestic terrorism with it. Chaining yourself to an oil pipeline under construction could see you in prison for life with all of your assets stolen and those of everyone you have any connection to basically. Being told to leave an area and not doing it immediately, or being accused of not doing it, is a serious felony if not terror. They are a further repudiation of the 1st amendment.
So an Israel protest they could have their own guy punch someone, the organizers could be charged, and face ruinous 100k fines and the like if I recall. It is just built for agents of the groups being accused to create and incident and destroy the organizers, and others involved in the protest. Or blocking a road, crossing the street could get you accused of blocking it and you are a terrorist or at the least a person facing 30 years in prison or whatever and hundreds of thousands in fines.
I am not sure if the greenpeace rico kangaroo court ruling used these new laws in north dakota, but that is sort of how it will play out. Basically going forward you can't have any established group sponsor or even endorse a protest.
Even if the charges don't stick it's ruinous to be charged and they know that, and the Israeli superfans are as vicious and capricious as they come, pleasuring in their impunity as the chosen people (of the US Government,) that are above law and given absolute power over American politics. A notion only we dispute.
https://theintercept.com/2019/08/19/oil-lobby-pipeline-protests/ Same issue different article than I read, search engines don't try to find what you ask anymore they give you one close, maybe, from the publication you are asking. Problem started for me in 2021 before that it worked I could find any article with knowledge from memory.
The dude that took that email was on his work computer at Harvard! Fucking wild.
People do be like that, esp. back then. It somehow ties in with the whole "I got nothing to hide (and don't you dare sniffing around)" attitude.
Not necessarily: the university just provides an email server, it doesn't mean that the email can only be checked while on the premises.
Holy shit, that's actually real: https://www.jmail.world/thread/8b008ba9020c65d97fae628e0ac57d2e?view=inbox
Wth is a jmail?
From the about dialog:
“What is this?
You're browsing Epstein's email inbox.
The Jmail Suite is an interactive archive of Jeffrey Epstein's emails, documents, photos, and more. Data compiled from the House Oversight Committee, Department of Justice, and DDoSecrets releases.”
It's probably what has surprised me the most about all this, how much has happened on free hosted email accounts.
I guess it means that privacy from human eyes (i.e. not automated scanning) is pretty good. Or Google/Yahoo is in on a conspiracy but I can't imagine regular operations staff being made aware of it.
Doesn’t have to be regular ops staff. Might be that some accounts are flagged as exempt because they’re too rich and special. Someone gets a list of those accounts and just plug it in somewhere.
It's highly likely that Epstein and Trumps entire operation was created with the support and cooperation of American and Israeli "intelligence" orgs. Basically, the intelligence agencies are compromised by billionaire pedophiles. They exist to protect and defend the capital of the billionaire pedophiles. In capitalism, the profits of the billionaire class IS "national security".
It is certain, we know this was Israeli intelligence, the CIA had to be involved, through action or inaction, this is their reason for being, preventing politicians and business leaders from being blackmailed by foreign leaders. This is the kind of thing that would justify extreme prejudice with foreign agents that were blackmailing politicians, and would've been if...
If what? Why was the CIA complicit in what could only be described as an unforgivable betrayal of the United States. Did Israeli intelligence first compromise the CIA chief, then use that to compromise everyone else? It would've had to be a number of higher ups in the CIA however, and the FBI. There are a number of people that could've dropped a dime on this but didn't apparently, so there was a structure in place to dissuade anyone from not going along with this Betrayal.
Obviously some would've been true believers, and all in those positions chosen to not have high minded ideals but to defer to authority and the chain of command.
But the CIA and FBI directors, and other deputies at a minimum, were complicit through action or inaction that is without question, and the CIA director is absolutely culpable directly. Maybe Hoover's old blackmail file?
That's it. There was a rumour about that too, Hoover's blackmail being stolen by some shady group, it was in a robert ludlum novel, which I didn't read, in that they killed him, when he was old already, making it look natural, and used the blackmail file for nefarious purposes. In Ludlum's books it's usually some nazi aligned industrialists. Not far off the mark.
Do however keep in mind that the entire intent here seemed to be the creation of blackmail, it's not just banality of evil but also ol Jeffy making sure that the dark desires of his marks was properly documented for mossad or whoever he was being funded by. He wasn't worried about being caught by the state, he was an actor of the state.
Epstein was an Israeli government asset. He knew he would be protected. He didn't need opsec.
I’ve been hearing that, but only from random comments here and there. Is there an authoritative article somewhere?
It's everywhere, you need to work hard to avoid it.
For example: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/4/epstein-israels-barak-discussed-gigantic-consultancy-sums-paid-to-blair
There are lots more.
I heard it was Russia
you heard wrong. Epstein had extensive connections to Israel, much more than he had with Russia.
Exactly. Ghislaine Maxwell is the daughter of a mossad spy, Isaeli CIA, and Epstein's partner. Epstein was a big time Zionist/Zionist-supremacist. He had a fictional country map on the wall of his NY house called "Greater Israel."
This is a pretty decent video about his ties to Israel being covered up in old media.
"100% open sores" 🤮
Sufficently advanced hubris is indistiguishable from incompetence.
It's like that saying about owing the bank money, if it's small amounts, you have a problem, if tens of billions, it's the bank's problem.
So it goes for being an Israeli honeypot entrapping politicians and swells into raping children and other perversions (and tax evasion,) on camera. You catch one of them doing it is your problem if caught. If you catch a critical mass of them doing it, on camera, it's their problem.

the best security is to not be in great conflict of interest with great powers
Complete arrogance about ever getting caught because you have blackmail on everyone is the signal of the rich.
That quote could mean a lot of things /s
It reminds me of my coke dealer
Me: drugs? Him: drugs.
Then I swing by. Say what you will about hard drugs least I’m not out looking for teenagers. What do you even talk to teenager about, even coked out. School?
Impunity is the strongest encryption
The fact that all these communications were pulled from GMail and presumably known to law enforcement for years shows its not signal.
Email is never private. The protocol is not secure. You have to add an encryption layer on top to get that, and it's annoying to manage.
Why does everyone keep saying Gmail? Did no one read his email address? It clearly says Yahoo....
Epstein had other email addresses like jeevacation@gmail.com. It largely doesn't matter other than it being kind of stupid to be using a US based cloud email server when the warrants come in.
Sure, but you’re not an agent of the state and are more likely to be arrested for your cat videos than Epstein was about pedophilia.
Is the boot partition on a separate drive because the unencrypted partition would somehow reveal information about the drive that could be used to analyze the encrypted portions?
Someone could install something on the unencrypted boot partition to leak the key next time it gets used
Would this not apply even if the unencrypted boot partition is on another physical drive? You still have to enter the passphrase into the prompt at boot. Wouldn't a compromised boot partition be able to access the passphrase in memory at that time, and use that to access the key?
It would, but I assumed the idea was to have the external drive with you at all times so no one could tamper with it. Otherwise I don't see the benefit, a permanently connected external drive may as well be internal.
Who is this hacker known as 4 Chan?

top 100 comments