I get mad that my microwave wants the date when a power outage causes me to have to set the time. it does not need to be date aware. every power outage its november 11th 2011 all over again.
post
Only one third?
An operating system should only be infrastructure to keep programs running. If I want an AI program, I'll seek it out and get it myself.
Not only is it completely useless for all but the simplest of summary tasks, but I also don’t need it so much that some “colossal” skuM needs to build their own EPA-violating methane burning power plants to provide that uselessness to my home computer. Diminishing returns doesn’t begin to spell out how little use this is to the user.
To me it entirely hinges on what kind of features. The Firefox local website translation feature is cool and useful. A chatbot reading my emails and giving me dialogue options, a program harvesting data on everything I do on my computer and sending it to a server, those kinds of things I do not want and will go out of my way to avoid. Normal rules of what makes software good or bad still apply.
even on features that might be useful i'm extremely suspicious why they must be shoved down my throat.
Imagine someone baking the best cake in the world and then trys to go around force feeding it to people so they too can experience the bliss that is WORLDS BEST CAKE.
I like my Mac. It has AI, like every other computer out there, but it’s like the Forrest Gump of AI. Except it can’t even tell you that life is like a box of chocolates… but with Apple Intelligence, you never know what you’re gonna get. We just accept that it’s useless. And I hope they do tell us our phones and computers aren’t good enough for the next version. I’m totally okay with that. I’ll stick with what I have.
According to “The Evolving Ecosystem”, a recent Connected Intelligence® report from Circana, LLC, 86% of U.S. consumers 18+ are aware of AI in smartphones and other technology devices
[...]
Of consumers who are aware of AI, 65% are interested in AI features coming to at least one of the device types studied — most commonly the smartphone. This figure rises to 82% of consumers between ages 18 and 24 and steadily declines among older groups.
So, an alternative headline that would be just as truthful: "A majority of US consumers are interested in AI features coming to their devices."
That's not going to get the upvotes here, though.
Yeah, there is that. There is also the fact that even going to the source I cannot find the actual study/data. No idea the sample size, method, or even list if questions. Mostly this feels like clickbait from PC Gamer.
I don't think PCGamer titled their headline with the objective of getting upvotes on Lemmy.
They titled it with the objective of getting clicks. OP chose to post it here with the objective of getting upvotes. Same basic goal.
I agree with you that this article was deliberately framed to cast AI in a bad light as it is in line with their audience's general sentiment. What I'm pointing out is that this target audience of AI haters is actually the whole gaming community. Which is massive. Which entails a massive amount of folks don't like AI one bit. You see where I'm get at?
I use it for work a lot. But On my personal devices? Nah I don't need it . And I especially don't want my data crawled forcibly
all 38 comments