I found that the members of r/luckystar were saying very sexual things about characters that, while 18, had very child like designs. And even if, they were saying shit like, "Cunny!" and, "Correction!" so, yeah.

I constantly reported all posts and comments like that I came across and eventually made a post asking why they were saying things like that. I wasn't hostile, and was in fact, rather calm about the situation. Meanwhile, they were all extremely rude and hostile towards my post, calling me names and such, and about 20 minutes later, my account was shadowbanned.

So, not only did Reddit moderation side with the pedos, they didn't even have the decency to tell me what I did wrong. Assuming how it all happened so suddenly, I'm just gonna assume the pedos all mass-reported my account for God knows what. Any and all appeals I've mad since then received no response.

I still stuck around for a few months after that, [that whole deal happened back in May of 2025.] but the extreme leftist political dooming invading every corner of the website I used made it absolutely miserable to use.

Tonight, I finally put my foot down and said, "I quit!" I discovered this website and made an account here. I guess you can use this post to welcome me to the Fediverse.

top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 60 points 9 months ago* (11 children)
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    This isn't like reddit at all! Not even a bit! Here the up votes are blue!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I was gonna mention that line in my own comment, but I'm glad someone else mentioned it.

    This place is literally the exact opposite of reddit in that regard. We welcome the overwhelming leftist political dooming. It grounds us in reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Heaven forbid leftists get a bit doomy when climate change is inevitably accelerating and fascists are in the process of consolidating their complete control over the most powerful country on earth.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    the extreme leftist political dooming invading every corner of the website I used made it absolutely miserable to use.

    ...So you came here? 🤨

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Ah yes, the Fediverse the bastion for check notes anarchists, socialists, communists, and other leftists. With three instances being known as the Tankie Triad. The major conservative communities are for leftists to make fun of conservatives.

    Yup, no extreme left political thinking here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    What utter bullshit

    Um I found a bunch of child molesters, reported them but got banned

    But like I stuck around for months after and only left coz the socialist were telling me that the fascists I believe in are destroying the country, the rule of law and its institutions

    /s

    So the child fucking molesters weren't enough to make you leave but leftist were.

    Fuck you

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (12 children)
  • [+] -28 points 9 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    You’re kidding right? You haven’t noticed European leaders bending the knee to Israel?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 9 months ago* (9 children)

    Erm no they don't, and even if they did, I don't see how that automatically makes them pedophiles?
    But we have seen a lot of evidence that pedophilia is widespread among the American elite.

    💩 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago* (8 children)

    So this week Slovakia’s national security advisor resigned and so did Lord Mandelson from the Labour Party in the UK. Both happened shortly after the latest file release because they are indeed very much in the files.

    Also as a European we are so very much financing Israel’s genocide. Not sure what sources you are using that say we aren’t. Type in any EU country in any search engine of your choice. Add in “money Israel” or “weapons Israel”. Sure plenty of countries are also condemning Israel’s actions while also simultaneously paying for those actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Sure. But over here they had to resign in disgrace. Over in the good ol' US of A, they stay in charge and get to shit themselves on camera too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Yep and that sucks. A lot of people have been working very long to fill the top ranks in the US exclusively with people who are at the very least on board with this kind of behaviour or willing to go along with just about anything blindly, most of which were replaced very recently.

    In Europe we seemingly still have enough people left that we’re not compromised. At least enough that they don’t dare to give people a free-pass publicly yet. We’ll see if anyone actually gets punished though or if it’s just for show.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    A few in Europe, and a lot in USA, and the whole thing being an American operation, there's a pretty significant difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    Sure there were Americans involved, but it was arguably a worldwide operation. Plenty of ties to the UK, EU, Russia, Israel and various middle eastern countries. I’m happy to talk crap about the US (amongst other countries) but I prefer to stick to facts when doing so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    True, but not the people that actually rule the UK or EU, only for USA does this spread right to the very top of those that actually rule. And it also spreads way more widely among the top in USA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    We also need to consider the media bias though. Most outlets I have seen that are reporting on the files are US based. They will likely recognize well known US names easily and so will their audience. It’s logical to report on those first.

    Also just to add more names to the non-US pile:

    • Ghislaine Maxwell - born in France to a French mother and British father
    • (Former prince) Andrew in the UK
    • Sarah Ferguson (former Duchess of York, UK)
    • Richard Branson, UK billionaire
    • Elon Musk (South Africa)
    • Stephen Hawking (UK)
    • Mette-Marit, the crown princess of Norway
    • Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime minister
    • Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi

    Willing to bet there’s countless more high ranking politicians and royals worldwide involved. We’ll get more names in time I am sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    Elon Musk South Africa. 🤣🤣🤣
    I don't think he had contact with Epstein when he was a South African.
    Also by that standard there are no true Americans apart from the native American.

    IDK the details about most of those people, but for instance Mette-Marit visited Epstein once, and apart from that only had contact by mail, I don't think that makes her necessarily a pedophile. She's an idiot IMO, and also she has zero power.

    Stephen Hawking

    Really? He was at a science conference at a neighboring island.
    You are making a huge guilt by association argument, and that's actually disgusting, and probably the purpose of the way the information is released, because it's to protect Trump and his friends.

    Epstein cast an enormous net to try to catch important people, just because the net was cast on you, doesn't mean he actually ever got to you.

    Let's wait and see what the evidence shows. If this will ever be properly investigated, which the current administration is doing everything to prevent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Sure, musk also had Canadian citizenship and also eventually US citizenship after 2002.

    People were sending their condolences to Epstein upon the death of Stephen Hawking because they “knew they were so close”. Also Hawking was directly accused by Virginia Giuffre of attending one of the same orgies as Bill Clinton.

    The Norwegian crown princess appears in the files over 1000 times and had close email contact for years and stayed at his house 5 years after his conviction. Her emails were in part referencing her son in relation to naked women. The same son is currently on trial for sex crimes.

    Obviously not everyone in the files will be a pedophile. Some people will simply be pedophile supporters, ridiculously gullible, motivated by money, simply victims or just existing in the same circles, but the same counts for the people from the US that are mentioned. You were the one claiming that this was a US operation. I have given you many, many counter examples with you giving 0 examples of your own. I’m done wasting my time on this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago*

    While there's certainly a lack of content (and by extension diverse voices) compared to Reddit here, there's definitely less corporate manipulation. It's a nice palate cleanser of that gross astroturfing fiefdom.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    I was banned as well for commenting too much against the zionists... pedos and zionists are not allowed topics in there... welcome to Lemmy, btw

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I mean, this place is quite a bit further left than Reddit. A lot of leftist stuff on Reddit started getting banned after Elon got his fee-fees hurt over people mocking DOGE.

    And, it’s kinda weird that the last straw was the anti-fascism rather than the creeps.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    And even if, they were saying shit like, "Cunny!" and, "Correction!" so, yeah.

    Genuine question, what does this mean? Is this slang about minors?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    You'd be correct. When freaks like that see minor characters, they start saying shit like, "UOHUH CUNNY 😭💢" and, "BRAT NEEDS CORRECTION! 😭💢".

    Now, to explain, "Cunny", [sometimes referred to as Cute and Funny to trick the censors and other people.] is a slang term they made for a minor female character's private parts. As for "Correction", they mean a bratty little girl needing, "correction." and by that, they mean... well, yeah.

    So even IF they were attracted to their personalities, [which I'd understand, after all they are 18 and fictional characters.] They're basically self-reporting doing shit like that.

    [Typing all that shit out is probably gonna get my account banned, but I just want to inform you.]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Help me understand: was this a subreddit you participated in for months or longer, before encountering a wave of objectifying comments? Or is it more like, you were a newb to the sub when you started pestering mods about a tone that was already established as normalized there?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago*

    constant reporting can apparently result in a ban, because "you reported too much" or whatever reason. reddit allows alot more bots to astroturf the site than usual. reddits far-left community is quite small compared to here. its more or lest center right beliefs.

    reporting seems to be a extremely futile exercise on reddit, because only gets you banned in the end anyways.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I mean, fuck reddit, but a character that is 18 years old is objectively not a child, nor would sexualizing them be pedopholia.

    Also lol, this place is far more left than reddit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I don't know the specifics, but it wouldn't be the first time artists say one thing for legal reasons but draw kids in sexual situations. "She's actually 2000 years old according to this backstory I made up, so it's OK"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (49 children)

    while 18, had very child like designs.

    Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it wrong. And it is absolutely legal if they are 18+, at least where I live it is.

    I constantly reported all posts and comments like that

    No wonder you were banned.

    So, not only did Reddit moderation side with the pedos

    No they were not pedos by any reasonable standard if the characters were above 18.

    EDIT PS:
    If this was really about pedophilia, the correct place to report it is the authorities, and not to some moderators so they can hide the evidence.
    The fact that this NEVER happened, shows that OP knows he was just pearl clutching, and didn't actually have a case.

  • source
  • hideshow 49 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    They said it was about Lucky Star. That show is literally about a group of high school girls. They're not adults in the slightest so I'm not even sure why OP said that. None of the characters are 18+.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    OK I have no idea what that is? When I google it I get a cartoon...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    It's a slice of life anime about a group of high school girls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    But anime cartoons don't have actors of any age, so that doesn't make any sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    😋

    In view of this new information I find it pretty stupid to complain to the moderators, because being fans of that cartoon, they could likely feel the same way as those posters.
    I do however absolutely agree that sexualization of children is wrong, and that was not the point I was arguing against. I thought we were talking about something where you could see the actors were 18+.

    The problem of OP not providing a link to the context.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    You're clearly cherry picking OP's comment there, conveniently leaving out what makes what they saw problematic.

    I found that the members of r/luckystar were saying very sexual things about characters that, while 18, had very child like designs. And even if, they were saying shit like, "Cunny!" and, "Correction!" so, yeah.

    Those terms are specifically used by the pedo "roleplay" portion of the anime fandom, there's not really any ambiguity there.

    Like, on the first sentence, I'd agree with you. But the second sentence makes it clear that they saw the disgusting part of the fandom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago*

    Those terms are specifically used by the pedo “roleplay”

    I have no idea about that, but if these characters were above 18, it does not fall under pedophilia. There is absolutely no room for interpretation on that.
    One is legal, the other is not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (39 children)

    And....the pedo defenders are here.

    You can play that game all you want, a character that looks 5 and you say is 18+ or 200 years old...is still a fucking 5 year old looking character.

    The fuck is wrong with you people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (20 children)

    You guys realize that you're talking about drawings right? Like, marks on a paper or screen?

    Even putting sexuality aside it's like arguing over how old these "characters" are:

    One of them is 5 years old, the other is 500.

    But over here in reality, it's all fictional and doesn't matter because they're just a drawing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (19 children)

    Yea cause a drawing of a child that someone sexualizes is totally the same of line drawing...got it...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (18 children)

    They're both just drawings. None of it is real. The only difference is the label.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (16 children)

    I fucking hate this argument.

    If someone used AI to generate a video of Epstein raping a child, would that be acceptable to you? The video isn't real either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

    I hate to do this, but it's simple: anything that looks like real children is bad and should never be sexualized.

    But anime? Come on. That's not how people look.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    So in your mind someone getting off to a scene depicting something like that is totally fine as long as it doesn't look exactly like a real child? You realize it is meant to represent a human child, right? Is any sort of stylized drawing fine then because it doesn't look indistinguishable from a real person? There's hentai explicitly about minors (like, not even high schoolers, but like fucking middle school and younger...) being raped by old dudes.

    Shit like this is why there used to be (and still is, although to a lesser degree) such stigmatization of anime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    No, I care about harming children.

    AI needs CSAM to generate it, and it may muddy the water about real victims, that's why it doesn't get a pass.

    If someone wants to marry a ferris wheel, I don't care. Inanimate objects, including fucked-up but obviously not real drawings, don't hurt anyone.

    Re: anime - I've seen some fucked up shit in 'normal' anime, like Bakemonogatari (very young girls in very bad scenes), so I don't recommend anime in general either. But I do not think it's a real danger, unlike genAI, eg Grok.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Child porn or adjacent shit in stuff like anime just normalizes it for people. A fucking ferris wheel was never made to represent a person. Just because some delusional person anthropomorphizes it doesn't mean that's the purpose behind its creation (and even that had consequences since the priest was forced to resign from the Catholic Church). Hentai + ecchi shit in anime featuring children is explicitly made to be viewed sexually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    So what you say is that intent is more important than the object.

    Therefore you loathe furries as well? As big part of it is anthropomorphized animals in a sexual way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I will just put it this way: the author of hentai/ecchi content featuring children had to sit down and decide "yes, I'm going to draw a child being sexually assaulted and expect it to be viewed positively." If you think this is acceptable, I don't know what to say.

    Therefore you loathe furries as well? As big part of it is anthropomorphized animals in a sexual way.

    If a furry gets off when they see an animal or something meant to look like an actual animal, then yes. If the furry just finds other adults in fursuits sexually appealing or whatever, I don't care. The suits aren't really meant to look like an actual animal (unlike a drawing of a child that is actually meant to largely look like a human child). Frankly this is closer to sexual roleplay with an adult wearing a diaper and shit and acting like a baby (I have no idea what the name for this is, all I know is that it exists). I find this very weird, but it's between adults, so again I don't care (from what I understand it's about differences in power and stuff, so I guess like BDSM). If the people involved get off seeing actual babies or things meant to seem like actual babies, then it's no longer acceptable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    No, because fuck AI and burning our future on that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (8 children)

    But you're okay with the content of the video being shared publically, in principle, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (7 children)

    Hmmm…

    I mean, purely on principle? Sure. No one would have been harmed apart from the environmental damage. Once that's done, nothing will undo that.

    Psychological damage purely from exposure and normalization of that kind of content, probably not ideal.

    The muddying of the waters around Epstein guilt, also bad. ("That was fake, so any other news must also be fake").

    Apart from the above sorts of things, (but maybe there's others I didn't think of off the top of my head): as long as no one watches it, it's no more harmful than the sentence describing the idea in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (6 children)

    So let's remove the additional impacts to test the standard. Hypothetically, someone creates a tool that is freely available and has no environmental impacts, doesn't rely on problematic training data, any of that.

    Its free to use for anyone to create and distribute photo-realistic images of what look exactly like 6 year old girls in sexual situations.

    You're okay with this, because it's not real and it's just pictures on a screen. Right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Sure, I guess, although it's kind of inextricably linked to the damage of actually using it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    How is that different when it's a drawing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Because it's less real. The amount of harm and/or damage is proportional the realism. Using that shitty line drawing I made for an example: if I say the lines represent something objectionable, would that make it so? No, not really.

    The closer to real, the greater the psychological damage to the viewer. However it's still no actual harm to anyone else.

    And then production of actual CSAM actually does harm children.

    Like, this seems like blatantly obvious stuff, no one is harmed by someone making lines on paper. (Or with modern tech lines on a screen but the idea is the same.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    So you agree that your line example is bad then. The lines are "less real" than a more detailed drawing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I mean if you want to interpret some shitty line drawings as CSAM, knock yourself out.

    The point I was trying (and clearly failing) to make is that judging images by the labels is stupid, but so is judging by leaving the appearance entirely open to interpretation.

    Hell, I hadn't even considered LLMs where a text description alone would be a problem since an LLM could use that to generate an image.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (17 children)

    I am absolutely not a pedo defender, there's a huge difference between being attracted to an 18 year old, who in my and most countries is of legal age, and being a pedo.
    The difference apart from being attracted to children, is that at 18 years old, you are considered old enough to make decisions for yourself also called being of legal age.
    Having sex with a minor on the other hand is automatically rape, as a minor is NOT considered old enough to make decisions for themselves.

    I am disgusted that your post has an upvote. When the persons are above 18 there is no moral argument to call people attracted to them pedos.

    USA however has a weird double standard in that regard, you are of legal age when 18, but cannot drink until 21????

    This doesn't make the slightest bit of sense, you can buy a gun, join the military, but you can't have a drink?
    USA is a pestilence of moronic double standards, and the country is suffering from am enormous degree of moral corruption, mostly originating in the insane level of Christian fanaticism, that is more similar to the middle east Islam, than to developed democracies. Of course similar moral idiocy exist in other countries too, but almost always driven by religiosity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago* (16 children)

    I am absolutely not a pedo defender, there's a huge difference between being attracted to an 18 year old, who in my and most countries is of legal age, and being a pedo. The difference apart from being attracted to children, is that at 18 years old, you are considered old enough to make decisions for yourself also called being of legal age.

    You literally are saying that it's ok to be attracted to children just as long as their backstory is they're over 18.... everyone knows that loli shit is fucking pedo shit.

    Having sex with a minor on the other hand is automatically rape, as a minor is NOT considered old enough to make decisions for themselves.

    Cool. Glad we can agree on that.

    I am disgusted that your post has an upvote. When the persons are above 18 there is no moral argument to call people attracted to them pedos.

    Except the characters you loli people are into are literally depictions of children, and you justify that shit by saying they're a 200 year old elf or some shit.

    USA however has a weird double standard in that regard, you are of legal age when a8, but cannot dring until 21????

    What?

    This doesn't make the slightest bit of sense, you can buy a gun, join the military, but you can't have a drink?
    USA is a pestilence of moronic double standards, and the country is suffering from am enormous degree of moral corruption, mostly originating in the insane level of Christian fanaticism, that is more similar to the middle east Islam, than to developed democracies. Of course similar moral idiocy exist in other countries too, but almost always driven by religiosity.

    Hey...hey stay with me... we're talking about you liking or defending those who like depictions of children and saying it's ok because you said they're 18+...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (15 children)

    There's a very strong difference between what we think and what we do.
    Being attracted to 18 year olds is absolutely legal. So what the fuck is your problem?
    By your standard role playing a wizard that kills an orc would make you a wannabe killer!
    The slippery slope pearl clutching around pedophilia is absolutely detrimental to actually protecting children against REAL pedophilia.
    For fucks sake let's attack the real problem instead of chasing shadows!!!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (13 children)

    Because you're not attracted to 18 year olds, you're attracted to children and justify it by saying they're 18. Huge difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    Says the guy who's suggesting that it's ok to be attracted to children, because the characters are 200 year old elves... they're still children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (10 children)

    You are insane, that's all I have to say. You are literally insane if you truly believe that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    So... answer some questions here.

    Simple yes or no.

    Do these characters look like children?

    Are these characters 18+ and never age past looking like children?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

    What characters?
    And in principle it doesn't matter, if they are 18 it's legal to have sex with them if they want to.
    If they are 14 but look like 40 it is not, and for good reason, because they are not old enough to give consent.

    Are you saying there's a minimum number of wrinkles that determine if it's morally correct? And putting on makeup makes the men attracted pedophiles?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    So you can't answer the questions then...got it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

    I absolutely answered your question, but you failed completely to respond to mine.

    HOW MANY WRINKLES?

    And is a role playing wizard killing an orc a wannabe killer?

    You are the one who has no grasp on what you are talking about, and can't answer simple questions that are similar to the accusation you put forward.
    I can call idiots like you out, because I'm in a safe position to do so. Your accusation however can be very damaging to innocent people.
    The hyperbole is insane, and you are way way out of line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Wrinkles lol

    If it looks like a child and you call it a 200 year old elf... it's still a child.

    Loli shit is pedo shit. Stop pretending it's not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    If it was actually pedo shit, why then didn't OP report it to the police?

    “think of the children”…cause that’s never been the dumbest fucking reason to do something…

    Yeah I can see you are a real defender of the children. 🤣 🤣 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It's weird to be okay with sexualized drawings of children. This amount of doubling-down on it really says it all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    I am not, I was misinformed, by what OP wrote, to think we were talking about actors that were visibly 18+ years old.
    I only later found out we are talking about Japanese cartoons, which traditionally have that child like look.
    I absolutely do not condone sexualization of children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    If you draw a baby wearing an actual diaper and arbitrarily call it a 200 year old immortal vampire, is it fine in your mind to depict it being raped by some random dude? I literally do not understand your thought process. Although, frankly, given the "difference between what we think and what we do" part of your comment, I'm not inclined to look on your thoughts particularly charitably.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Careful.

    One of the mods of this sub will threaten to delete this post unless you can provide them with what they consider to be proof of your claims. They'll even go so far as to lie and say they tested your claims and found them to be baseless, despite clearly not testing your claims.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I got myself IP range banned lol. Why? I think the comments that triggered staff initially was saying establishment Democrats are scum on worldnews. That's all it took.

    After that I kept making new accounts with various combinations of "spez" and "micro penis" while advertising Piefed everywhere and that pissed someone higher up off big time.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›