Reddit remove posts that has their names in the headlines(in my experience posting there). Is there is a way to mention them without saying their names?

BTW: Lemmy rocks for not implementing a censorship system like Reddit did.

top 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I've actually broken my own anti reddit role since the Alex murder. I upvote and comment on everything anti ice and pro people standing up to this shit.

    We need to flood everything and everyone with a unified message.

    Fuck spez, but this goes beyond that.

    If you are liberal, or just a decent human being you need to flood all social media with the truth and downvote argue with all the fascists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I was going to suggest Cheeto and K-man

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago

    I've settled on [REDACTED]. Everybody knows who I'm talking about, because everybody knows that they redacted him from the Epstein files.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Orange Mussolini and Elmo Muskrat?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Tangerine shitler

    Muskrat

    Agent orange

    Lots to pick from

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago
    [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    There are plenty of posts that contain both names on Reddit.

    Were they really removed by the reddit admins or by subreddit moderators? Did you get any message about it?

    If your posts included slander, a human might have reported you. That can happen just as easily if you use recognizable nicknames.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Sounds like an automatic thing, so any nicknames or euphemisms that catch on would just get added to the list.

    That said, it all depends where you want to fall on the respectful/rude spectrum. I'd go with rude: "The most unpopular President in at least 150 years" is both accurate and specific to Trump. "The owner of xAI, the world's leading distributor of CSAM and NCII" for Musk. Longer descriptive statements are harder to auto-block without catching a lot of false positives.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    El Diablo Naranja

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Fat orange fuck and that Tesla douchebag are my go-tos

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    DJT. The Big Cheeto. Fatty CIC. Narcissus Egregious. King Fake News. Forty-seven. Diaper Don. Wiggy. The Annoying Orange.

    Elongated Muskrat. Trillionerk. X marks the clot. Emeraldus Egregious. King Grok. The least-nice South African. EM Interference. Plugs. Mr Makes-everyone-leave.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Epstein's best friend and Apartheid nepotism kid.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    I followed the lead of the young staffers in the Biden White House, and called him HitlerPig. I usually call the other one The Goblin. People usually know who I'm talking about.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Staying off social media owned by fascist techbros is a better choice...

    It doesn't matter what you think you're accomplishing there, the reality is you're just a punching bag and without you they'd fight each other which divides their base and depresses their turnout.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I understand your opinion fully.

    But I still like to participate in discussions with wide variety of people, which at least currently are simply not available on Lemmy or Digg as far as I can tell.

    Here on Lemmy there is only one type of people, Leftists. Usually it would be fine for non-political topics, but it sucks when it comes to any political topic. because you don't see a political discussion here but rather one opinion on repeat.

    That is at least my opinion on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Here on Lemmy there is only one type of people, Leftists

    Buddy...

    If you think we're all "leftists" then the only differentiater you're looking at is support of fascism, and there's even a couple fascists, so that can't be it.

    Most weeks I get called a neoliberal, a commie, and everything in between.

    There's room for nuance here, and there's never room for that when fascists are in the room. You leaving Jack's up the percentage of fascists, which scares off people who don't care about politics.

    I know I just said:

    It doesn’t matter what you think you’re accomplishing there, the reality is you’re just a punching bag and without you they’d fight each other which divides their base and depresses their turnout

    And you ignored it, so I said the same thing with more words, kind of a hailmary on my part.

    because you don’t see a political discussion here but rather one opinion on repeat.

    Then disagree with people...

    I do it all the time, sometimes I get heavily downvoted, sometimes I change a couple minds. But you can always just be the change you want to see

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Daughter Rapist and Mangled Penis

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    🥭 and 🍉

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    "our current President" or "the current US President"

    I refuse to use his name myself, so I'm pretty practiced at this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I call Trump Agent Orange or Tweeto Cheetolini.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Always been quite fond of Melontusk. The name, not the person

    And The Orange [blank] works well, e.g. "The Orange Horror". Maybe even just "The Orange" tbh.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Elongated muskrat

  • source
  • Fuck reddit.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly: my first thought is to figure out how to make your point without mentioning either.

    I know I'm not there default Internet denizen, but personally I'm absolutely sick of seeing their names and taking about them, because so much of it is ineffectual rage bait. It misses the plot.

    I don't need to hear more about their personal failings. I know what kind of people they are. What I need to to know about are their victims and their challengers: the people who need protected and the people finding success protecting them.

    Based on my experience, Reddit isn't limiting their names. Every visit is a deluge. I have to wonder if your posts are just failing to grab attention in New for the usual reasons. If so, using silly 'He-who-must-not-be-named' euphamisims probably won't help.

    My advice is to focus less on them than on the people and things we must focus on to parry their attacks and transfer their power to servants of public will with integrity.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    I wonder how many people are browsing this thread to help improve their personal word filters, although the names in the title would probably hide it from anyone that has those set up already.

    RES supports filters, a number of lemmy apps do, and I think piefed has it built in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Cuntface and Shithead

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Damn reddit is a POS Glad I'm not on that shit site anymore Nowadays I can't even look for forum advice on it because it just says I'm making too many requests, like bitch I haven't been here in a week

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Huh I never knew that. I got a violation once for saying we should've put Musk on one of those rockets they launch in space. Nothing about involuntary or anything. They said it was advocating violence and denied an appeal. I guess given how many of his rockets explode it's logical to assume anyone being on them is likely to get blown up. Still it's quite a stretch to violate someone for that, I think.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Is D. T. and E. M. censored as well?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment