Bullet casings, for one. More than one person shot him.

Photos of the scene, work timesheets showing who is there, witness information...

I also would love to see charges filed immediately, but there's a reason they collect all the evidence first. Yes, we all saw it, but a good state prosecutor has to know at this point the federal Trump DOJ and DHS will certainly remove the case to federal court (even if it proceeds under state law) and will try to intervene to dismiss. They will pull out every dirty trick possible to avoid a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That includes sabotaging evidence solely in their custody or claiming the prosecutor did not do due diligence and then produce some magically exonerating new evidence.

If we want the charges to stick, we need to box in the DOJ and DHS.

There are ten? Can you provide a link(s)? I am collecting every one I see shared and backing them up to a single Mega share.

Do you know the identity of the shooter? Cause they're not just going to tell you.

Transparent to them means they can be openly racist, sexist, and general xenophobic cunts.

What you are looking for is honest. They are not honest

Transparently corrupt.

As "transparent" as in "nothing to see".

Even if they didn't destroy evidence what is going to happen? Congress seems fine with the current set of events.

We don't know that he does.

Yes.

But there are no consequences so they will ignore the court order and destroy any and all evidence they can, just as they did for Renee Good’s killer, the murderer Jonathan Ross.

Law has never really accounted for bad faith actors from the prosecution side. They most likely won't enforce it either. We're very quickly finding out just how much laws won't help us.

That is the job of judges- to interpret existing law. The news here is that a judge agreed that it is illegal and told them not to do it.

It's more that the judge wants the punishment to be greater than the typical punishment for tampering with evidence. When the victim is dead the law tends to give undue credence to the statements of the survivor as there is only 2nd hand testimony provided for the prosecution. We should interpret it as a judge making a stand and vowing harsh penalties and the supreme court/appeals should interpret it as the judge making it much harder to overturn the eventual decision.

Because there is a 50/50 chance they would all get murdered and their bodies disappeared, too.

I would like to think that Judges, especially those leaning Republican, are starting to think that some people might start thinking they’re complicit. So maybe they want to keep heads on shoulders.

I mean. That's just ignorant at this point...

Even the judges trump was placing for the federalist society a decade ago are turning on trump, and have been this whole term.

It's not enough, we need more out of court systems. But this is something, and it is real.

Like, shits fucking serious. We need to be honest about what's happening

It’s another crime they’re guilty of. Hopefully a continued buildup of evidence will help some true believers see the light, but more importantly it is yet another thing they can be charged with and is harder to cover up.

The court system will never be immediate or truly dramatic, but as long as the wheels of justice continue to grind forward, however slowly, there is hope

Whats the point of your comment? Is the implication they should do nothing? The judicial branch has successfully stopped the executive multiple times. Not sure what you're on about.