You both are wrong
post
Arguing on the Internet in a nutshell.
No it's not
Have you ever argued on the Internet?
just in case some of the younger folks don't get the reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ
You know, Quasimodo predicted all this
no he didn't
Ugh, this is the exact thing Nietzsche was talking about.
No he didn't.
Have you read his works?
No. Have you?
No.
(I did Philosophy undergrad and honestly never read a single Nietzsche work. Have to look up his name to spell it correctly.)
I for one would be pleased if this level of honesity was normal online. Admitting that no one reads Nietzschean works is the first step.
While Nietzsche spoke of this, we will unfortunately never know if he wrote of it because I can't read.
doesn't matter if you read it or not, it never makes much sense until it does and then you are basically beyond mentioning it in polite conversation
(you know who has read it and who hasn't after you have read it)
(you know who has read it and who hasn't after you have read it)
By the hollow look in the eyes of the ones who have read his works?
"What should I have to give thee! Let me rather hurry hence lest I take aught away from thee!"
I resent the fact that I read him and understood what he was saying.
What I wouldn't give for the blissful ignorance of those for whom his works are just word salad or the insane ramblings of a deranged lunatic...
I would trade my soul for that, only I already lost my soul by reading and understanding Nietzsche.
They should really put his books in the "restricted section," sealed with an ouroboros, and a warning that says "the words contained herein are dangerous. Discretion is advised."
I tried to read it, but I was filtered by the first chapter being a rant about how no one wanted to buy his books. (I think it's Genealogy that does that?)
And then they kissed.
all 41 comments