top 60 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 9 months ago
[–] 70 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This was so obviously a bad idea from day one, I was shocked at how widely adopted these were right away. In retrospect I shouldnt have been surprised but somehow I just always expect people to be smarter.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    All you have to do is not tell any of the customers that it continually listens, by the time the ones who didn't know find out, it's already in their homes, they've already got the app installed, and they've said "I dreamt about something and then saw an ad for it the next day" more than once.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Has there actually been evidence of Alexa or Google homes being used for government surveillance?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Ring doorbells now give their footage to Flock, which can give/sell it to anyone. No warrant necessary. Not exactly what you're asking about, but along the same lines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    Ring, also owned by Amazon, shares their video surveillance with Flock, which contracts with local LE agencies who share it with the feds.

    0 warrants required, and ICE is actively using the data against people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    They got caught sending info to their data banks they said they would not, and listening all the time even when they said they would not.

    All of these smart devices do. If it is connected to the internet, presume it is spying and will sneak the information back.

    The feds in the us buy data broker info, all of it, the cia buys and steals foreigners' too, and distribute it to agencies all the way down to notes, not attributed to source, in the local police's lien, law enforcement information network. Their dossiers on everyone. No warrants or judges, blessed by the supreme court for some time this is not new.

    An end run around privacy laws and the bill of rights. Just like 5 eyes end runs spy agencies not being allowed to spy on their countries. They let their ally do it, lead it on paper at least, then share it with them.

    All a result of being ruled by lawyers working for plutocrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago*

    An autistic teenage hacker banned from having a computer used a fire stick in a hotel room to hack Rockstar games. I think any given 14 year old war driver can hack these devices and listen to your conversations. If the government will work their butts off to install a tap on a landline, how can they not use an Alexa.

    At the very least, there's a teenager in your neighborhood listening to every damn thing you say. If you have cameras in your home, they're watching you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Shhhh, the pitchforks are out, who needs evidence. In all reality, if you were to be wiretapped, an Alexa wouldn't be the best option. Most people already have an internet connected microphone they carry around with them everywhere. And it has multiple cameras too, which are regularly brought into the bathroom with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago

    Which is basically what Snowden revealed btw (phone metadata collection, internet traffic interception, data access from tech platforms, fiber-optic cable tapping, smartphone location and metadata)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It's fucking wild to me how so many people willingly signed over their privacy so blatantly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    They've been conditioned to not care or even desire it. Smartphones had Siri and Google Assistant as a selling point, which led to ever more intrusive tech that was marketed as a convenience. Facebook took it a step further and had you label people in pictures uploaded to them and you sign away your privacy in their terms and conditions. Advanced marketing techniques were irresistible to social media companies and so consumer profiles of everyone they could get became a thing.

    Jokes about seeing ads that smartphones can overhear made the intrusive spying all the more accepted as just a part of life. Android marks your calendar and reminds you of appointments made using your Gmail account when you never asked it to. Ring doorbell cameras quietly sell their video feeds to the highest bidder, often to law enforcement as a convenient means to circumvent the 4th amendment. And now the latest trend is to have your car do everything your phone already does but take it a step further by monitoring your driving habits so insurance companies can justify raising your premiums.

    The average person isn't tech savvy enough to understand they're being sold as a product even after paying for their own surveillance gear. They just want modern conveniences without thinking the price they pay beyond the original sale.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Authoritarians learned that 1984-style totalitarian control doesn't work anymore; so they tried Brave New World's control through psychological pleasure, and it is more successful than ever imagined.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago*

    I don’t take VACCINES because the GOVERNMENT puts TRACKING CHIPS in them! You can’t trust ANYTHING made by SCIENCE anymore!

    - Sent from my iPhone

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    The scariest part is when you just think about pancakes and then start seeing ads for flour and maple syrup 10 minutes later. They don't even need the wiretap anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah because they know you like pancakes and can serve you ads to start that train of thought so when you are served the pancake ad you feel like it 'got you' instead of the real fact that you were manipulated into thinking about pancakes so the pancake ad has more possibility of getting engagement from you. This is why you should have ad block on everything you interact with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    yeah people don't realize just how insidious advertisement really is.

    your phone isn't "reading your mind," advertisers have such a comprehensive model of you that they're able to predict your thoughts with an incredibly high degree of accuracy before you even have them. There's also obviously a bit of confirmation bias in play, you only remember the times they got it right as opposed to the times they guessed wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    My hypothesis is that it's a frog in a pot of water scenario. Western Union started the first charge account in 1914, so we've had a long time to get used to the water heating up. It probably did start with honest intentions to make things work a little smoother, but I remember the early days of digitizing records, and there was a LOT of loose data just there for the taking.

    I remember that I used to work at RadioShack in the late '00s, and I had to escalate up to district because we discovered a treasure trove of old paper store credit applications that had been cached somewhere in the backrooms, and my manager wanted to just throw them in the normal garbage and not risk the cost of the extra shredding coming out of her bonus.

    These things had SO MUCH INFO, handwritten out onto a paper form; name, birthday, SSN, mailing address, street address, then all that info of the spouse/cosigner that wanted to be on the account too. I could have made so much money on the black market, looking back.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Truly amazing how many breaches of privacy people are willing to put up with if the propaganda says that questioning the tracking means you're hiding something and deserve to be tracked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    Or to protect the children! Child abuse is the trojan horse, also age restrictions a trojan sheep they have several on offer, to surrender to Tech. Social scores by half baked ai deciding everything secretly, in a way no one can know and challenge. The entire west is trying to surrender their citizens to Tech giants last year for a cut of the info and personal exemptions for politicians and security services.

    Past generations would tar and feather these assholes something is wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    This is the dawn of technofeudalism. First our data is sold to the CorpoLords, then our lives, then our souls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    It really is.

    In the late roman empire the rulers fucked up so much, no one could pay their taxes, government wouldn't even accept it's own watered down currency for taxes but demanded gold or silver or services and goods in kind. It got so bad people were walking off of their jobs en masse after those jobs didn't provide for life anymore.

    The empire responded by binding people to their jobs for life, and their kids. Many city people remained free but country folk were enslaved. The big latifundia factory farms turned their estates into castles and became lords. All while the barbarian invasions came sweeping through, and the people welcomed their government getting crushed.

    One could see how that will play out again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    We need another secession of the plebians. Let these tech bros try and carry on without their main profit vector

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    That is a great idea. I think we should re-establish the Tribunate. With the veto on government actions and the rest, ability to offer sanctuary, being sacrosanct. Peoples' tribunate. 500 bc and 350 bc the plebs did a general strike and got that and other concessions and expanded it, simply by decamping to a large hill and refusing to do anything until demands were met. I think they got written laws from that too, the 12 tables, before that the rich just made shit up as they went.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Your phone is probably worse. Yes, even with GrapheneOS.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Please explain?! Is GrapheneOS a honeypot in your opinion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I think it can give a false sense of security, because all of the security and privacy feature can be individually bypassed by the user.

    if you try to use it the same way as a regular android phone you end up giving all the apps the same level of control as they would in stock android eventually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    what the other guy said, plus, speaking entirely about a graphene phone vs a voice assistant, even the sandboxed telemetry is going to give more telemetry because you carry your phone around and use multiple apps, but a voice assistant is a static location and most people use it for music, recipes and weather, whereas more people are more likely to use their phone for banking, shopping, maps, messaging, photos and looking at adult content.

    Obviously if you have a phone you've just turned on for the first time and you like to tell Alexa when you're shopping for expensive jewelry every day it'd be reversed - I'm just talking generally

    Edit to say: people get tunneled into "Alexa is a microphone, a phone is a computer" when they are both both those things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago

    When phones were still tied to a cable, people were freer.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago

    Alexa Home Microphone. They mis-named it as a "home speaker" but actual home speakers have been around for 100+ years. They originally looked like this:

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    I actually use mine as a disability aid. My motor control isn’t the best so it’s good just to call out for light and heat adjustments.

    But I’ve long since come to terms with the fact that if ICE or whoever wanted to come bust me down, there wasn’t anything stopping them before I got what is essentially a home aide, and there’s nothing stopping them now.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Fuck. I just made apple butter pancakes last night. This is me, except way hotter.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    With so many methods for global communications in the average persons hands it not a wonder at all. People are not even one iota security conscious until they get tagged and by then its too late

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    people are lazy and sold a solution to a problem that didn't even exist. like standing up....

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    No no no, we're in chat buddy era so it's "Hey wiretap propose food for today"

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Google search chatgpts work the same way dear computer guys

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 1 point 9 months ago (14 children)

    Something us fundamently wrong with people, prior generations would never surrender their right without realizin or caring in prior generation. The entire west is going dull 1984.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (13 children)

    1984 seems based on Orwell's experiences working for the British government at the time, so in a very real sense the west has been that way for a while

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (12 children)

    He got disillusioned volunteering with the socialists in the spanish civil war. Hemimgway too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 9 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    I didn't know that part. I think everyone involved in the spanish civil war came away jaded though. Which communists did he inform on then, in the UK? Do you recall the years he started?

    He didn't seem to be much of a fan of british intelligence when he was writing his books anyway, he didn't pull any punches.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 9 months ago* (9 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    No I'm an American with limited knowledge of the spanish civil war, I should know more but I don't. I read half of for whom the bells toll, by Hemingway, didn't particularly like the book either not that much of a hemingway fan, I hate him because he hunted big game animals too.

    Just everyone you heard about that fought in the Spanish Civil war for the socialists, and I think it was fairly common for idealists to come to spain to fight with them just like europeans did in the American revolution, they all seemed to have lost their idealism and became pessimistic, like Orwell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    a big part of it was people seeing first hand the Soviet's sabotaging the CNT-FAI's efforts, which I imagine was part of what turned Orwell against communists later in his life.

    I still contend that if the Soviet's supported the Syndicalists as much as the Nazis supported the Nationalists, CNT-FAI would have won the war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    If you're interested, I'd recommend reading through the works of José Peirats, especially The CNT in the Spanish Revolution: Volume 3 which details the numerous different ways that the Soviets suppressed and terrorized the syndicalists, going as far as imprisoning and torturing anarchists and anti-fascists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • 1 comment in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 9 points 9 months ago*

    Honestly, it's even worse than that, because the companies spying on us in most cases are less accountable than our own governments.

  • source