In a sane world this would never have to happen
post
“Everybody wants us to have a bigger presence in Greenland to combat the Russian/Chinese Arctic influence,” Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said.
If only we had some kind of alliance with Greenland/Denmark and perhaps other countries in the North Atlantic. Maybe we could, like, set up a military base in another country to protect those mutual interests? I know it sounds crazy because we don't do any of that currently, but maybe that would be a better option.
But how would you steal all the wealth from Greenland for your corrupt corporate overlords/your insider trading?
Who, me? Oh, I wouldn't. That's probably why I'm not qualified to be POTUS.
Yes in the North Atlantic. It’s like we could have some kind of Treaty. Maybe we could form some kind of Organization. Maybe someone could make Trump think he came up with this idea all by himself. FIFA could give him a trophy for it.
They also act like US Corporations wouldn't get a really good deal if they wanted to purchase the rights to extract some of the mineral wealth of Greenland to extract.
He already isn't supposed to be able to do this without Congressional approval. But if he does it will be without consequences regardless.
Yeah I don’t get it, they are trying to stop him with laws after he ignored laws and there was no consequences.
How about you apply some of the existing laws and do those consequences
That’s not true. There have been numerous operations in other countries that were not given approval by Congress. Not saying it’s right but there is definitely precedent for it.
Lindsey Graham should do the world a favor and end his own miserable, self-loathing life
Does something like this even make sense? He didn’t have the right to invade Venezuela, but he did anyway. What a bill going to do to stop him?
It gets votes on record on who thinks it's okay if Trump wants to invade Greenland.
The war powers act gives the president the authority to invade any country on earth, he only needs congressional approval for operations lasting longer than 30 days. Congress also gave the president blanket authorization to invade any country he thinks might be harboring terrorists, following 9/11, with this absurd, fascist decision to grant the executive dictatatorial powers passing the Senate 98-0 and the House 420-1 (and with nearly 90% of Americans supporting Bush at this time). Trump's actions in Venezuela therefore, while a brazen violation of international law, are fully within US law. It's virtually impossible for a president to actually violate US law through military actions abroad.
Any attempts to rein in these ridiculous laws should be fully supported and are badly needed. Even if Trump ignores them, it can then be used to discredit him and prove that he is acting against the will of the people.
God damn. It’s worse than I thought. Plus with the Supreme Court declaring all actions taken as president to be legal, he can do anything he wants now, whether legal or not.
This is why I keep telling people that Trump is not an anomaly and is not new. I think a lot of people on here must be too young to remember the Bush era.
The line from the Star Wars prequels of, "So this is how liberty dies: with thunderous applause" captures how it felt and was clearly about Bush's policies. If Trump is worse than Bush, it's only because he's standing on the shoulders of fascist giants. And tbh I still regard Bush as the more dangerous of the two because he was able to command such overwhelming support, there was zero opposition in government anywhere, at all. He could ride his bike with no handlebars.
I feel there's a nonzero chance that Trump might just go all out if a third impeachment looks like it will succeed.
Like, what if Trump decides to build up forces around Western Europe, and then launches bombs to flatten Copenhagen just before his removal? And then when he's out, he tells the Dems that the fallout is their problem now.
“Everybody wants us to have a bigger presence in Greenland to combat the Russian/Chinese Arctic influence,” Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said.
For the kids in the audience, Lady G ran for President in 2015 (before trump rode the escalator to hell) and for his campaign announcement speech he basically filled a good half hour with flag-waving demands to attack Iran immediately. Like, that was the most important issue of his campaign. Which- Iran was not especially in the news for anything at the time, even.
Sort of like when the Sandwich Artist comes out from behind the counter to talk about the weather and then goes on a thirty minute rant about the little people living in his teeth.
A.k.a. Graham is a complete fucking tool who should never be acknowledged, much less quoted.
Let's make a rule to control the guy known for not following any rules!
How about another one that bans him from kidnapping foreign and domestic people without the agreement of Congress and put a heavy toll on it if violated like you get to not be president anymore and go to jail until anyone you jailed is free. You stay in jail if its not possible to free for example a person who might have accidentally died.
And like that, the world forgot he was a pedophile.
No one forgot.
The problem is that this is technically a bigger issue as far as governments are concerned.
Grab'em by the oil/Greenland/rare earth minerals.
When you have 11 carriers, they let you do it.
He's still acting like a pedophile.
The fact that he's a pedophile should be enough for all the fat lazy Americans to get him out of office. The fact that he is murdering people all over the world on your behalf is actually more important to the rest of the world.
Remember when the president had to go to Congress and ask them for a declaration of war rather than it being Congress taking action to stop the president from declaring unilateral war by himself? You know, like after Pearl Harbor. Good times.
Trump is no business man but he is a genius at deflecting. It seems Epstein file related comments are almost non-existent lately. The files haven't been released as ordered by law, and the deadline to release them has been passed. Crickets...
I wouldn't put much past the current American administration. I haven't been able to shake this impression that we might really be looking a the telegraphing of an invasion. From what we know and have seen, the administration is very much itching to apply the fullest extent of its powers. It's defined by unprecedented and extraordinary use of extralegal action and complete disregard for how it might be seen by the world at large.
They said for years that Russia wouldn't move on Ukraine, and then green men marched in and took over Crimea. It's no secret how much America is becoming increasingly like Russia in every way. US already has significant military presence in Greenland — a green men play would be really easy. And Greenland also has a surprising number of politicians who openly say that they prefer the security offered by Trump's America over Denmark, even as they declare that they want independence (experts argue that independence might make them even more vulnerable to takeover right now). It's easy to assume that at least some Greenland doors would open up to an American green man advance.
Also, as far as consequences for taking over Greenland, we seem to be primarily looking at a breakup of NATO — something that is also on this US administration's longstanding wish list. Experts don't seem to think it's ultimately likely to result in an actual war so much as make it crystal clear that the old rules no longer apply, and that the US isn't a friend (the Article 5 debate is shaky, especially against the prospect of actually going to war against America, and especially while NATO is also dealing with the Russian war in Ukraine). On paper it kind of reads like a win-win-win situation for the current brazen, imperialist, and isolationist American kleptocracy.
I'd say we at least need to take this stuff seriously.
You've put the cart before the horse... the USA isn't "becoming increasingly like Russia in every way".
Russia is becoming increasingly like the USA in every way
Odd statement to cut and flip around out of all of that text. Reminds me a lot of ML.
It stuck out to me, I've been reading how the USA and friends "aided" Russia in the 90s, after WWII, and after WWI, pouring billions into it to keep the money flowing, every drop for capitalism.
We like to blame them for so many things, frankly to increase our (USA and friends) own military spending and much more.
I can only think ML means milliliter tell me the secret
No secret, ML is Marxist-Leninist. They tend to have a similar focus and way of framing things as what I'm picking up from you.
Dumbest thing I’ve heard of. Resolution to keep the idiot from doing something he’s not allowed to do anyway. Like making a law to make crime illegal.
This feels like one of those American things that takes forever, is ineffective, and ultimately just ignored by Trump.
Resolution is passed. US can't invade Greenland. US invade Denmark. Checkmate (and world war, probably)
Give conservatives power and the next thing you know we're submitting bills to prevent the conservative president from invading ally nations.
The fact that the Republican party will still exist after this is a testament to how sad this nation has become.
You’re living through a grand moment. We don’t know how this story will be told, but probably as the fall of an imperialist empire led by a population of spectacle dazzled individuals who believe in the authority of concepts like The Market. A society too obsessed with their own freedom from to actually obtain any freedom to. A society with such little humility, American Exceptionalism can be seen touted as the cultural norm despite clear lack of substantive exceptionalism (mind having the most war ships). When all of this becomes immediately obvious to the general public, you might say we’re in an age of post-enlightenment. I wonder what we’ll find on the other side of that evolution.
Jesus Christ our government is so fucking stupid. The headline on this article gave me an instant migraine 🙄 what a country
Hey Ms. Lindsay, we could just help our long time friends and allies of Denmark and Canada while we reinforce Alaska if that's actually a concern. We could gladly just offer the both of them whatever it is we're going to use for defense and trust that as our long time friends and allies, if we quit treating them like shit, they'll let us know if they need help. We already train with them. Both are in fucking NATO, that's part of the point of it.
Fucking shit, we used to have soft power because we did exactly that.
He won't invade. He will just declare Thule base and an arbitrary amount of land "around it" sovereign territory.
I don't know. Gone are the days of his first term where his cabinet refused illegal instructions. He's old, demented, mainlining russian propaganda meant to encourage self destructive behavior, and surrounded by bloodthirsty sycophants who all want to play caesar. Unfortunately everything from invasion, to what you proposed, to forgetting about it are all on the table
I'm just saying it the laziest, easiest way to create a "fait accompli" without technically attacking a NATO ally. From the point of view of NATO, it then becomes a territorial dispute similar to those between Greece and Turkey, or the Whisky war between Canada and Denmark. It's the easiest way for Rubio to keep him happy without blowing up NATO.
If I were the "Boss of all Europe", I'd have nuclear weapons in Greenland/Canada already; you could launch and wreck the USA long before the USA could retaliate against Europe (Greenland/Canada would be "taking one for the team").
Ironically, that's what Trump wants to prevent (security risk and so on).
By "Trump" I mean whomever has inspired our impaired, senile POTUS to take Greenland.
This probably means that the USA is planning moves against Europe/EU/NATO in the future, so it wants lots of ocean between us, as much as possible. This has always been the best defense for the USA, it's allowed us to punch, but not be punched back. So far.
Europe has nuclear weapons closer to the US than Greenland.
Technically, if everything works as if on paper, an attack on Greenland is an attack on Denmark. An attack on Denmark is an attack on France, according to EU articles, which are more tightly binding than NATO ones. And the French have nukes on subs floating under the Atlantic in undisclosed places, and their nuclear doctrine is basically "we use nukes as warning shots".
In practice, just selling all US securities and cash reserves held by Europe would basically cause the US economy to implode overnight, and the US government to have to declare bankruptcy, and stop being able to pay or even feed its soldiers.
The problem is that it would also cause a deep recession in the EU and basically all over the world, so that's why we're playing chicken.
Oh, good.
We've had one mutually assured destruction, but what about second mutually assured destruction?
That's very interesting, thank you, I will read up on the "French Connection"
I did not know that!
I do know USA has launch sites in Europe and submarines, also. I'm not sure if NATO or the USA controls them the sites in Europe.
IIRC the USA does not have intercontinental missile launch sites in anywhere but the US. The US nukes in Europe are all plane borne bombs.
Those can't really be launched unless both the US and the host country agree, and France and the UK have a bunch of those as well.
You're right on paper, they are weapons to be loaded on to planes...
Maybe I'm paranoid, but I think they probably have nuclear missiles on US military bases in spite of any agreements.
An IBCM is hard to hide. And they don't need to.
Like how people care so much more about his threats to "European territory" then his threats to Latin America really shows the bipartisan and international Western imperialism.
Take Ukraine and Palestine.
Palestinians face an ongoing genocide and European states just kind of mumbled about things when challenged on it.
Ukraine gets invaded and Europe is all over it.
Palestinians face an ongoing genocide and European states just kind of mumbled about things when challenged on it.
WTF are you on? We went on strike, had some of the biggest protests in recent history, blocked ports and ships...
Yep its not states in this example but events like FIFA and others banned Russia but refuse to do similar to Israel because they are "beyond politics" except they obviously aren't.
all 81 comments