Trump dismisses leaked assessment suggesting strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development

Donald Trump said he is weighing forcing journalists who published leaked details from a US intelligence report assessing the impact of the recent American military strikes on Iran to reveal their sources – and the president also claimed his administration may prosecute those reporters and sources if they don’t comply.

In an interview Sunday with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump doubled down on his claim that the 21 June airstrikes aimed at certain Iranian facilities successfully crippled Iran’s nuclear program. He insisted the attacks destroyed key enriched uranium stockpiles, despite Iranian assertions that the material had been relocated before the strikes.

Trump dismissed the leaked intelligence assessment in question – which suggested the strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development – as incomplete and biased. The report, circulated among US lawmakers and intelligence officials, concluded that the damage inflicted was significantly less than what Trump’s administration had publicly claimed.

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 170 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For some reason, he seems extra butthurt about getting caught lying this time.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 85 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's because fascists always have to be right and be the strongest. So strong that any resistance means destruction and the only path of survival is to fall in line.

    He insisted the attacks destroyed key enriched uranium stockpiles, despite Iranian assertions that the material had been relocated before the strikes.

    Trump dismissed the leaked intelligence assessment in question – which suggested the strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development – as incomplete and biased.

    Not only is he not as strong as he says, he looks downright weak. It's personally dangerous to his image and is a test of power to those within the GOP. He needs complete loyalty so others will follow his orders without question. But the question is now "is it worth it?"

    And there were real believers within the GOP who wanted to avoid WW3 or a nuclear engagement only to see AIPAC have more pull than actual Americans in the deployment of American muscle. Trump needs to keep those stragglers in line or risk having a shattered party that can't do anything but in-fight over the next 3 years.

    He's fighting this so hard because this is a fight for his future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 96 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    The funny part is the leak could only have come from inside his administration and party because he withheld briefings from his political opponents

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It was Pete Hegseth in a Signal group Biatch

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago

    It was Hegseth thru a Signal group again

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    hegseth already leaks through his alcoholic breath.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Seriously.

    Somebody should put a breathalyzer interlock device in that guys mic. And his devices for posting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago

    That's how you know the intelligence is accurate.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Reporters should all just say it was Don Jr.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    "That's not true! ... Who told!?"

  • source
  • They forgot to hang up after ordering the pizzas. Domino’s guy heard the whole thing.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    That's called a subpeona, Mr. Trump.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Maybe it was Iran?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Truth hurts MF 🤬

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Our source was Mr. Lickma

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    "force" in this case means "extort information" or just straight up applied violence, I assume.

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/globalnews@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I wonder how many journalists will go to jail?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    If a reporter won’t go to jail to protect their sources, then they’re not a good reporter imo. That’s like, a huge part of their job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They might not even know the source. The Guardian for example has a Tor service to upload them stuff completely anonymously.

    Of course the crooked courts will pretend they're refusing to comply and jail them anyway to make a show.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Just pack your shit and journal in another country

    Edit: downvoted for suggesting a way to keep your sources and yourself safe? stay classy .zip.

  • source