top 45 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 108 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Saving you a click:

The patient suffered a horrific workplace accident involving heavy machinery, which tore off a large part of her scalp and her ear with it. The damage to her scalp and vascular network was so severe that restoring the ear at the time was impossible, so the procedure was performed to save the patient’s aural orifice so it could be reattached to her head later.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    The patient can’t wear a shoe on that foot, but I guess that's the least of their worries at that point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Maybe they'll be able to graft the ear back on her head before she'd be healed enough to walk out of the hospital anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    That's the whole reason they attached it to her foot.

    The damage to her scalp and vascular network was so severe that restoring the ear at the time was impossible, so the procedure was performed to save the patient’s aural orifice so it could be reattached to her head later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    That's the whole reason they attached it somewhere, but your quote doesn't address my speculation about why they picked her foot in particular. I was making a guess about the relative timing of her being healed enough to release vs. being healed enough to have the graft moved back to where it belongs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    They do this with penis injuries too. I'm surprised people are surprised?

    Or maybe I know too much about dick science.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    exactly my thought. You have no choice, an ear is going to be grafted to somewhere on your body. Why NOT choose the center of your forehead? especially if it's temporary.

    unless the damage was so severe the foot was the best spot :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 23 points 10 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago

    You are right regarding the first reason for the placement:

    Per SCMP, Qiu said they chose the foot because the arteries and veins there are compatible with those found in the ear. The foot’s skin and soft tissue are also similarly thin to the head’s.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago*

    This case is another example why proper patient care is so important:

    But complications arose five days later, when the ear turned purplish black as its connecting veins struggled to send blood back to the heart, causing the blood to pool. Over the next five days, the team rescued the ear with manual bloodletting, a labor intensive process that required almost five hundred individual interventions.

    Every hospital cutting nursing jobs to a skeleton crew has blood (and ears) on their hands.

    And it's the same with rehabilitation measures: especially with neurological damage after a stroke or brain hemorrhage starting with therapy ASAP preserves and restores function and abilities that are lost if it takes months to get therapy.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    thats kind of amazing that you can just graft one body part onto another while waiting for the correct spot to heal enough to actually have a successful reattachment surgery.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The ear is about the only thing this really works with. There’s not much special going on with it, it’s just shaped flesh and cartilage. You don’t even need nerves in the ear to use it, since literally everything happens inside your head.

    You couldn’t do this with pretty much anything else really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    For…. Science?

    Edit:

    The damage to her scalp and vascular network was so severe that restoring the ear at the time was impossible, so the procedure was performed to save the patient’s aural orifice so it could be reattached to her head later.

    Okay, but its going to be really hard to find socks in the meantime. Also, dont the hairs that allow you to hear not grow back? I assume the ear will never be useable again. Although I guess the aesthetic appeal is still there

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I've heard this idea has been kicked around for a few years now...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago
    [–] 13 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Sometimes it can be a perk keeping an ear to the ground.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Congrats. A human spider.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    A great milestone for humanity.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I bet somebody has this on their 2026 bingo card

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    That ear on the foot pic was awesome. Wish there was a shot of the ear back on her head!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Impressive and again a yay for science

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    "My eyes are up here."

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    fucking surreal, kudos to the medical team who did this

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago
    [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    What tf happened to the lady for such a horrific accident to even happen?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I understand the point of this Zoidbergish procedure, but I still have one question - did they bother connecting the nerves and if so, is there tactile sensation on the ear?

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)