manbearpig (quokk.au)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/peoplemastodon
 

top 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 123 points 10 months ago (16 children)

My old boss says she rather risk her life riding a weemo taxi than take a Uber.

When asked why, she said that an Uber driver dropped her off at home, after about 15 minutes, then Uber driver was still messaging her. She ignored it. After 15 minutes later, the APP asked her if anything is wrong because the driver was still parked at her front door.

She called the police and they showed up 30 minutes later and made him leave. Dude was at her house messaging her for 45 minutes.

Ya, I'm a dude and I would also choose bear.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 85 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    It's also wild to me that I've been told multiple times by experienced outdoorsmen that the most dangerous animal you can encounter in the woods is another human, but that's entirely forgotten as soon as the culture war revs up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    yup. all kinds of people in this thread equating "encountering a bear" to "being mauled by a bear"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Well of course, being that the other side of it is equating "meeting a man" to "being raped or murdered by a man."

    In reality, 99.99% of the time in both cases absolutely nothing will happen, but that doesn't stir up fear and anger so it's less fun to acknowledge that.

    You know how many bears I've seen in the woods in all my days out there? 4. Know how many men I've seen? Me neither, lost count somewhere in the hundreds (ok I never counted because it's such a common and trivial thing). In all those times, the bears kept eating from the dumpster and the men politely nod and keep walking. Ironically the bears eating from dumpsters are the more likely ones to kill people, and strangers are the least likely people to kill people (usually someone you already know), but still, nothing happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago*

    I mean, I don't even need to google the statistics to tell you how outright stupid of a claim you have made here. Go and google for yourself, the stats on bear attacks vs human attacks.

    Like even if you just think about it for longer than 6 seconds you have to realize that obviously what you said cannot be even close to true and that you have to be a fucking idiot to think otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    Yeah, a bear lives in the fucking woods. That's his house, and presumably if you're not fucking with the bear, the bear most likely won't fuck with you.

    But another person? With unclear intentions for being in the woods? Not everyone is out to get you, but it's a higher risk than a damn bear. Especially if you're a woman, by yourself

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

    goes to show how hiring unvetted people for a service like that really isn't a great way to do it

    *fuck you autocorrect

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    inverted people

    I hate it when my Uber driver shows up with their skin on the inside and bones on the outside.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I fucking hate autocorrect. gets worse every year somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    I love it when it mangles other peoples' comments in funny ways and loathe it when it also has the audacity to change my words in a totally imperceptible way.

    I will make no attempt to rectify this hypocrisy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Just turn it off. That's what I do whenever I see software "correct" something in a way I didn't intend. I'd rather have a typo or incorrect spelling than an unintended word. Hell, even the generally helpful ones like "auto capitalize" I'll turn off on desktops because they mess with typing out code blurbs for an email or document.

    Though swipe typing is in its own little zone where the plasticine province predictions can be frustrating but make of it usable. Otherwise I'd want a physical keyboard back.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 94 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Oh god mgtow. That whole thing is a walking red flag

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I generally dislike writing off people (or groups or things) based on a soundbite or a hashtag - I'd much rather evaluate for myself whether there's any decent and informative point to the content.

    #mgtow though... The very presence of it makes one cringe, and I can't think of an occasion when it hasn't descended into a dumpster fire from there.

    I suppose it's nice of them to flag their own content so well really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I miss when I didn't know what it really meant. My imagined world was so wholesome

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Genuinely curious, your world was wholesome before that single fact?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    no no the world i imagined all those mgtow people making their threads about, with guys throwing their own tea parties for themselves and going on little hikes by themselves and having little log cabins for their pet screaming possums. i don't live in the real world it's scary out there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I understand now, I genuinely didn't get what you said before. I learned about incels and mgtow at the same time, so I knew that they are literally the same thing under a different name (misogynist, violent, hateful and very partial to the fat right). The abbreviation sounds very harmless.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Huh, must have changed a bit. When I came across it years ago it seemed like a reasonably healthy response for an incel - stop worrying about women and work on yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Back when I first heard about it I thought it was really nice that there was a group of men supporting each other in rejecting the idea that heterosexual monogamy was the only path to a fulfilled life. Life is full of disappointment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (47 children)
  • [–] [S] 48 points 10 months ago (37 children)

    Yeah, I'm shocked at the level of misogyny on Lemmy. I swear shit was never this bad even a few months ago? Maybe I was being ignorant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago (21 children)

    Na, never has been different. Look up any thread that even mildly implies men could do something wrong and it's only hate from there on.

    I wonder why tough. Lemmy is fairly left, pro LGBTQI+, etc. but in regards to anything mildly feminist you get... well, this kind of lovely thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] [S] 27 points 10 months ago*

    I feel bad for note paying attention to it sooner. I think I'm going to have to post more of this sort of content all over the place to piss of the sexists.

    Sadly brocialism is a thing amongst some leftists.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    lemmy is a network mostly populated by cis white men. like a lot of liberal/leftist spaces populated by cis white men, it’s going to be progressive on the surface; i.e., they oppose right wing shit. say here that you support the right to abortion, immigration or gay marriage, and you’re not going to meet much pushback.

    but, as soon as you start criticizing dominant groups (or just, say that they have power over oppressed people), now people yell at you. you can see that here, but also, say that anti-white racism is not a thing, or even just that it’s not comparable to actual racism, and you’ll wonder if you actually logged into reddit by accident.

    heck, just criticize people’s behavior as bigoted here and they’ll rip you apart…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Yeah, that tracks. I wonder if the average age being around 40 adds to that equation. I am 40ish myself, but encounter a lot of cis white men in their tweens in left spaces, that seem to be quite reflected im regards to feminist topics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Because it's unnecessarily inflammatory. The "bear or men" thing is apparently interpreted completely differently by at least some men and women and instead of listening to each other it just ends up as hate for each other. Why would you want to piss of the men that are on your side?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Why would you want to piss of the men that are on your side?

    ... If this question pisses you off, maybe you're not as on the side of women as you think you are.

    They're not asking if people would feel more safe with a bear or you, they're asking about a completely random, unknown man.

    I'm sure you are one of the good ones, I'm sure the majority of people on this thread are, but it's not about that, it's about the unknown.

    You shouldn't be pissed off at women for being afraid of men, you should be pissed off at men that make women afraid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Nobody wants to be lumped in with a bunch of people they find disgusting, which is what the question is about. I can fully understand women replying the way they do, but I can also fully understand men getting upset over the implication. It's bullshit ragebait and dividing us unnecessarily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago

    If you're upset over the implication then I have bad news for you: every time you're walking down the street and about to pass a woman, the exact same thought is likely going through her head. There's a very high chance that said thought is from prior experiences, too.

    The key thing is that it's not about you, it's not an attack on your or your character, it's about how women feel. I can appreciate why the question feels like rage bait, but you have to also consider that the only reason it feels like rage bait is because so many women feel the way they do and you have to ask why that is. You then have to consider your position, if you would rather that women didn't feel that way, what are you going to do about it? If anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    I can also fully understand men getting upset over the implication.

    The implication that their unknown behavior makes them potentially dangerous gets them upset to the point that they lash out and show exactly that their unknown behavior is, in fact, dangerous? No, I don't understand it, and I understand it proves that the question is right. If this makes someone upset, that person is the danger. It is not divisive because it has always been true for everyone who is subject to it, what makes you upset is that it is being pointed out and explained to you why it has always been bad and why this divide has always been there while you pretended that it didn't exist. I don't get upset when someone points out the existence of a problem that I already knew was there. Hell, even if I didn't know it was there, my reaction is oh shit is that an issue what can we do about this, not how dare you show this to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 10 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] [S] 16 points 10 months ago (10 children)
  • [+] 7 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Fuck misogynists.

    If you're not a misogynist you shouldn't feel hurt when I say that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    It's not sweeping sexism, it's just toxic masculinity that's the problem.

    Feminism is the solution to most problems with men. Men are the ones rejecting the solution without even considering it. So who is sexist here?

    Nobody is faulting men for their gender. They are being accused of protecting the bad actors by acting like 'no there is not a problem, I'm the good one'.

    By staying oblivious in face of the facts, and not owning up to it and saying 'those stats are fucked up, we need to do better', you are part of the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    If I offered you some candy from a big bowl of Skittles and told you that only a handful were poisoned, would you eat one?

    One bad apple spoils the bunch etc.

    The man/bear thing seems stupid to me - but that's probably just because I've missed the point of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    A potential solution to a lot of gender-related issues is to make agender the default. Gender should be opt-in not opt-out. This way more people will not have a gender to be treated as, and people will get more used to treating people in the same way with little regard for gender.

    However, this would be difficult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    the root of most hate, and i mean like… DEEP hate isn't any active emotion towards another person but instead an unwillingness to audit our blindspots. what i see a lot on lemmy is people who are steeped in Internet Culture who assume that they are progressive, forward thinking, and have it all figured out. i try to come into discussions with the mindset that i'm guilty of this, too, and that i'm a work in progress.

    there's also a deep seated fundamental misunderstanding of what feminism is here that matches very directly to what you would get used to seeing on reddit. it's kind of funny, because it demonstrates that the Read Theory bros theories don't consider critical marxist analysis of gender to be part of the theory that needs to be read, which is frustrating, bordering on upsetting. anytime i recommend someone read bell hooks' Feminism is For Everyone i get antsy about how long in will take for someone who's let conservatives tell them what feminism is to tell me that's a propaganda rag and that bell hooks doesn't know what feminism is

    it's like solidarity amongst the lower classes only matters up until the point when you have to start working against the oldest arbitrary division that's been used to keep us from organizing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    it's like solidarity amongst the lower classes only matters up until the point when you have to start working against the oldest arbitrary division that's been used to keep us from organizing

    Unfortunately, I think a lot of the read theory bros on lemmy are people who are less concerned about solidarity with the lower class, and really just involved in Marxism because they want to abolish class because they've incidentally fallen into the lower class.

    There seems to be a lot more anger about their own displacement within their own society than the plights of more disenfranchised minorities classes. I think that's why a lot of the Marxist/communist instances are so obsessed with the particulars instead of being a more big tent community.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    the Read Theory bros theories don't consider critical marxist analysis of gender to be part of the theory that needs to be read, which is frustrating, bordering on upsetting

    As a big Read Theory Bro, turned Read Theory Girl, holy fucking shit, this is so true.

    Marx, Lenin, and friends are great, but there's so much Feminist and Queer Marxism out there worth reading

    Engles' Origin of The Family, Private Property and The State

    Alexandra Kollontai's Communism and The Woman Question

    Anuradha Ghandy's Philosophical Trends in the Feminist Movement

    Transgender Warriors by Leslie Feinberg

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Unfortunately no, it’s been like this since I made my first account over 2 yrs ago. It hasn’t really gotten worse but it’s also not getting better. It’s basically why the AFAB cis population of the platform is tiny. Why would women stick around when this stuff is what every post about women turns into..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Yeah.... The vast majority of the comments I've had rack up a bunch of down votes on this platform have been arguing with misogynists. I think it's mainly a byproduct of the demographics of lemmy mostly being made up of young dudes working in tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago

    I hope it may be a bit of confirmation bias. Most of the people who are not misogynists just move on after reading the meme and don't comment. I was about to do the same until I saw this comment thread, and now I'm in the gutter of other comment threads here trying to fight the good fight 🤣.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Maybe it just wasn’t apparent? But flares up in posts like this.

    Still. It’s literally mgtow ChatGPT slop, with the caption “hey, you said you chose the bear!” I’m floored/ashamed the response is anything but “wow, Rafael is a jerk.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    That's always the response..... You wanting me to acknowledge the systemic disenfranchisement of women/minorities is sexist/racist.

    That or it's .... It's sexist to not let me have a tantrum about the "male loneliness epidemic", and somehow the epidemic is because of women.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Men in general have no idea what women have to deal with [from men]. And so many men are fragile and want to turn it around and make themselves the victims. If you are having a hard time befriending women, then you need to look deeper into your actions and how they might be perceived by someone who has to deal with unprovoked messaging, calling, touching, staring, following, etc. Men are the reason women travel in groups to the restroom, or that there is such a thing as a drink cover in a bar, or that there are women only driver options for ride services, etc. etc. You just need to realize that even if the actual percentage of men who are creepers is low, it doesn't mean that the number of interactions women have with them is not. All it takes is one scary moment for a woman to be put on the defensive for good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    Still though. Even assuming total ignorance, where’s the respect?

    Rafael is an abusive ass. It’s clear cut.

    Hence I don’t get the responses below… Are others guys really so afraid of the bear meme “perpetuating a toxic message to other women” or whatever that their respect for other human beings goes out the window? Like it’s too dangerous an idea? I’m pretty socially isolated, yet that sounds like fascism to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I don't understand why this triggers so many men. I think a lot of them just have absolutely no experience talking with women or reading about their interactions with men. Just a total lack of curiosity or interest in what life is like for women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    absolutely no experience talking with women

    Also, most people have no experience with wildlife and think all bears are murder machines.

    The vast majority of bear encounters outside of very specific locations are with black bears. In which case you just end up momentarily scaring each other and then they run away.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Genuinely men don't see some of the issues women deal with. Like, all of my female friends have stories about dudes being creeps, but my male friends mostly don't have stories like that. It's extremely easy to be out of touch with even your close friends on this matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Most of the user base is from Reddit, so no surprise. Ostensibly progressive guys who take criticism of things other men do personally. I'm particularly familiar given I used to be one of them, though I wasn't on Reddit then.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    A bear's intentions are obvious.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    if you can read bear body language, maybe. if you don't.. uh, no, they're not, they can change suddenly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago

    Post of a kind "Men once again prove women right"

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago

    Wild how a simple safety tip got turned into a whole fantasy scenario. Sometimes the point really is just: let people feel safe.

  • source
  • [–] [S, M] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Alright people, that's a wrap. I'm going to be handing out a few bans, if you think I've banned you wrongly (or missed someone) feel free to message as I'm only human and may make some mistakes trying to navigate this dumpster fire of a comments section.

    Edit: Done, I think? Some comment removal is not working, or maybe taking a bit of time in the background. Please report anything you see if you've come across it.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›