Context: PugJesus often spams low quality posts across the dozen or so communities they mod, apparently downvoting low effort spam on my frontpage is trolling. The only other action in the modlog is a different ban for 74 years for "Mass downvoting innocuous content," so it definitely seems they are just banning people that dislike their spam. Glad we're not missing out on the reddit mod experience here.

top 72 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

This is why piefed implemented an anonymous voting option, so power tripping mods can't ban you for down voting their posts.

Never mind, I guess the power tripping mods got it removed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Wasn't that option removed eventually due to it breaking social aspects of federation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    He's banned me from all his communities. Power tripper and disingenuous in how he engages

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago

    PugJesus has always rubbed me the wrong way. He always inserted whataboutisms in rambling ways which put the onus on you to figure out his esoteric points. Then you try to answer what you think he's trying to convey, and he just roasts you on that instead.

    Very bad faith mod/Lemming that should be avoided should you care for your mental health

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    How do you see your ban reasoning?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Ugh, Pugjesus, no surprises here

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago*

    Why is all the drama always about one guy. I think this is at least the third "front page" post I have seen involving drama with this guy in just a few months.

    Can't we just implement some reasonable go touch grass cooldown period. No modding or posting from that account or IPs associated with his account for 90 days.

    If its a problem as soon as he's back then 180 days next time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    What's your experience with them?

    They post a lot of content in some historical artifact community, and they seem very cordial and nice there. Might even be Swedish, but not sure about that.

    You're not surprised about what exactly, out of curiosity?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    To me? Nothing. However I have seen many people post getting bans from them for super petty reasons, like downvoting a post.I have also seen this person be a point of contention a few times in some more shitposty places. So I just tend to avoid commenting on anything they post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Never would've guessed they had an ego this fragile. Disappointing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I like the historical artifacts posts AND I've seen PG be a dick. I try to encourage the good in him through positive reinforcement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Unfortunately, my experience with social media has been that a lot of the most visible posters often are touchy, and can be a little domineering where they can. I look at his history posts, like the art ones, etc. However, unless I specifically have something to say that fully within the confines of the subject, and not negative, I will not post. In other spaces I block them. This isn't necessarily PJ I am talking about either, this is a broader thing with these platforms. It is what it is I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Sounds like an unfortunate phenomenon. People who post a lot on social media, especially online communities, might have limited social lives compared to people who don't post a lot. And thus they might... define themselves a little bit, by the success of their posts? Perhaps? That's what I'm thinking. And so they become very defensive and protective of their online presence and it's a fragile thing for them if it's a large part of who they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    I post a fair bit compared to the average user, but that's only because I recently moved away so my social life is absolute shit right now.

    I've interacted with quite a few of the top posters here, most have been pretty chill if not genuinely motivated to build communities, at least in my experience. But, I agree that spending too much time on social media can be unhealthy. I had a near breakdown and had to cut myself off years ago when I was a monster of a teenage moderator, so I try not to judge too harshly and stay aware of my mood on here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Aside from what has already been said a lot of that history is stuff on the caliber of "Rome invented roads!".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The communities I'm subscribed to have a lot of interesting things, like the historical artifacts one. But it is often just pictures... You have to ask for more info, but it's usually provided after that.

    But I can imagine what you're saying as well. 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago

    Blocking pugjeasus is the best move anyone on lemmy can do

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Meanwhile PugJesus is banned from db0 due to stalking and mass downvoting my account, and said the admins were abusing authority for banning him while he confessed doing it with joy.

    What a joke of a person he is. At least he's started to into his own echo chamber instead of trying to convert spaces into his own. I remember when he would mass report people disagreeing with him, while giving citations that said he was wrong. The mods told him to stop reporting people who weren't breaking any rules, and he told them to do it anyways.

    Needless to say, PTB.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I remember when he would mass report people disagreeing with him

    I saw four such reports from him today. Two were ostensibly over someone being inadequately suspicious of a North Korean working for Amazon. The other two were ostensibly over people making political comments in an explicitly political post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    He also immediately screenshot the comment you're replying to after the thread was 2 days old. He's obsessed with people talking about his actions and thinks they're worse than the fascists in office he does nothing about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    It seems lately they've at least stopped making a thing about throwing shitfits in communities they don't control and moderate.

    So as far as I am concerned: it's their mind palace. I wouldn't take their mod actions seriously or personally.

    Nevermind they must've seen this thread and my Local feed is now filling with MeanwhileOnGrad posts about users in this thread.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)
    1. Do yourselves a favor and pe-emptively block PG’s communities. He’ll just delete anything you say counter to his “Vaguely Left-Wing” point of view, and he’ll perhaps ban you. He curates them to be ideological bubbles.
    2. I and other mods & admins do ban people for vote spamming. For instance: 1) in the case of alt accounts that some people use solely for voting multiple times, 2) in the case of people who always downvote specific communities and 3) in the case of people who downvote a particular person regardless of the content.

    Edit to add: He posts almost exclusively to the communities he mods.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    I just told them to go away and no speak to me. They have so far and they haven't banned me from anything yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Care to elaborate on what I can only assume is some passive aggressive insult?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    You share the same political beliefs as PJ and he actively seeks an echo chamber. Why would he ban someone likely to agree with him or upvote his content? Even if you don't directly engage with him you might comment favorably on someone else's posts even and he can get his fix. Almost all of his energy is driven to political content is why this matters.

    That's not an insult to you, at least not from me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -7 points 10 months ago

    What political beliefs are those exactly? Be specific not vague and repetitive.

    That's not an insult to you, at least not from me.

    Sounds like an insult to me but I also didn't ask you and you also didn't get exact either nor how you've developed a understanding of my political beliefs from the modlog of all places.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    Just block PJ. They're a turbolib troll. You'll feel better not seeing the junk they crank out.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago*

    PTB/CLM.

    I think that "Mass downvoting" is a valid reason for a community ban, but I would expect a temp ban if it is not a repeating behavior.

    But it isn't trolling by itself. That bad qualified ban could have a bad impact in others mods or admins evaluating the OP behavior.

    May be in the future, communities should choose who can vote (subscribed, instance members or any user) and then only been show in the corresponding feeds. But I suspect that most of the mods that ban downvoters don't want that they community posts don't be shown in the All feed.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Question, how come you don't just block them or the community or something, if you don't care to see their content?

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    One could always curate their own feed instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 29 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    I do, but I also like going on all to see what is out there. Unfortunately it can get buried when the same person is spamming a dozen submissions in a couple hours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 10 months ago (12 children)
  • [+] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    I think if you’re downvoting posts just because you feel the person sharing them is spamming, especially in a community you don’t contribute to, you should just block the person instead of putting a metaphorical thumb on the scale in community you don’t care about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    I don’t see any specific rules for the grimdank community, but piefed.social does have this instance rule:

    2. Spam and Malicious Behavior

    • No spamming, flooding, or advertising without permission. 
    • No scams, phishing attempts, or distribution of malware. 
    • No brigading, vote manipulation, or coordinated harassment.

    I could see a case for arguing it’s vote manipulation, although I feel that’s kind of a reach. I just find it weird to get annoyed that someone is posting too much in a shitpost meme sub. Browsing the All feed and getting annoyed with that feels akin to going to a club and being annoyed there’s loud music. Just block the poster bothering you and move on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    It's not forbidden, but also don't act surprised when whoever you're downvoting excludes you from their community, which shouldn't be a big loss to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Not really. Hypothetical: If someone who doesn’t like metal music enters !metal@lemmy.world and downvotes every post there - and commits themselves to doing it to every new post, this hurts their visibility across the Fediverse. Would you not say its reasonable, in this specific hypothetical, for the community owner to ban a user who does that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Well I'll give you my own experience: When I was growing !television@lemm.ee before lemm.ee shut down, the community collected about 5 frequent downvoters. None of these accounts ever upvoted. They never participated by posting or commenting. In a few cases, two of the accounts had no posting history on the fediverse at all. They existed purely to downvote. Whether because they didn’t like television as a topic, or hated news articles being posted - I don’t know. But they would, between them, always downvote posts and sometimes do so early - deprecating their visibility.

    Since moving to piefed after lemm.ee shut down, I've only had to do it again twice.

    I think it’s reasonable for a community moderator to decide that these accounts are unwelcome and ban them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Are you not familiar with pug?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I am, I’ve never run into any issues with them personally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Well I find that hard to believe, but that's not quite what I asked. I said are you familiar with them. More specifically how they post. Because you must know they post like 150 posts a day. Spamming simultaniously all across multiple communities usually very low effort brain rot quality posts. It is extremely easy to end up down voting a lot of their posts. In fact if you have any Integrity you probably are going to end up down voting a lot of their stuff.

    Now I certainly agree that blocking them is the easier, and far more intelligent, option. However if you don't pay attention to who's posting things it's very easy not to realize you're down voting the same person over and over. And I don't think most people do. Unless they have that user tagged or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    I’ve found some of their history posts pretty enjoyable. Sorry I don’t live up to your idea of integrity, I guess? I just don’t see the appeal of browsing all if you don’t want to see dumb meme content here and there. Not even sure I see how this is especially an instance of power tripping as it sounds like pug did OP a favor considering they didn’t like any of the content on the community in question. I checked the grimdank mod log and there’s a grand total of two bans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    There is an option in your settings so you don't see upvotes or downvotes.

    None of these imaginary points matter. I couldn't imagine spending my time wringing my hands over how others vote. Or wasting my life looking up every comment and post, agonizing over who voted and how.

    But its your life though, go nuts nutzos. Consider defederating if your skin is this paper thin.

    (Lemmy is rad)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    I am not speaking for the user who OP referred to here, but it's not about visibility but about the impact of downvotes in terms of trying to grow and maintain a community.

    If someone who doesn't like metal music enters !metal@lemmy.world and downvotes every post there - and commits themselves to doing it to every new post, this hurts their visibility across the Fediverse. Would you not say its reasonable, in this specific hypothetical, for the community owner to ban a user who does that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago*

    Yep, it's not about being offended by downvotes. It's about stopping users from drowning all the content in a community because it didn't spark joy for them.

    If we couldn't ban for that, it would give folks free license to brigade. The women and trans communities would be sunk. There would stupid pissing contests between the Fuck AI and Pro AI people, and I hate them both. It's good they can just cut the fuse by banning each other so they can stay cozy in their homes. Everyone should get to be cozy and happy in their houses, where angry letters are to be expected, but hurling rocks at the windows is discouraged.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    If someone who doesn’t like metal music enters !metal@lemmy.world and downvotes every post there

    See, that's not what is happening, I'm not against the concept of the community, I think they are poor quality submissions for that community.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    I need to see the posts in question to really give a judgement here.

  • source
  • [+] 24 points 10 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    That user was one of the first that I blocked. Blocking users has made a greater positive impact on my feeds than blocking communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I'm gonna be blocking someone, but it ain't gonna be PugJesus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›