top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 318 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Because fuck you, that's why.

  • Microsoft

Saved you a click.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Anyone who wants to try Linux but is scared of or reluctant about anything about the process at all: talk to me! There are multiple ways to try it with zero change to your system, like Oracle VirtualBox or a USB flash drive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 187 points 10 months ago* (15 children)

    In Windows 10, you could move it to the top, left, or right of the screen.

    In every version of Windows up until now which has contained a taskbar and start menu, as far back as Windows 95. Not just Windows 10. Let's not sell short the full extent idiocy on display, here.

    "Pouring its engineering resources," my ass.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    In the launch version of windows 11 and for over TWO YEARS it didn't even support drag&drop. It was working fine even on windows me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Drag and drop worked on windows 3.1. That was like the whole thing. "LOOK WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW!"

    At this point, I'm fairly sure pissing people off is the point with Windows 11. It's full of AI no one wants, refuses to officially run on most hardware that people already have, despite running just fine on that same hardware UNofficially, dropped support for drag and drop, doesn't let you move the taskbar.

    And thats not even to mention the fact that it monitors you, and reports back to HQ with screen grabs and usage activity.

    Oh look, ZorinOS, just one singular distro, had 1.6 million downloads in the past 2 months.

    Wait, is there any special thing that happened 2 months ago? Oh right. Windows 10 support ended, and microsoft told its userbase "fuck you, you can't get support for windows 10, and this computer can't update to windows 11. This computer is now trash!"

    Suddenly all these youtube videos pop up "Is your PC unable to install windows 11? Try linux!"

    And these videos don't try to sway you to one distro or another. They point out a few big hitters like mint or ubuntu. I can't imagine them specifically naming zorin, unless it's a zorin centric video. But I'm talking about the flood of "try linux" videos that popped up in October.

    And that 1.6 million is JUST zorin. That's the runoff. I don't have numbers, or sources, but gut instinct tells me that if Zorin had 1.6 million downloads, Mint must have had like 5 million minimum. Every video always reccomends Mint. It's probably overtaken Ubuntu at some point as most used distro.

    And all of this, every single bit of user loss has NOTHING to do with linux. Users are angrily switching. Not happily. They feel abandoned, and forced to switch.

    If Microsoft either extended Windows 10 support, or allowed Windows 11 to be installed on reasonable hardware, this linux boom DOES NOT HAPPEN. This is Microsoft saying "Yeah bitch, money is tight! Go buy another computer, loser! You'll do what we say, and there's nothing you can do to stop us!"

    That's when users switched to linux. This is pure hubris from Microsoft. It would be interesting if somehow we could get a combined number of EVERY distros doenload numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    It also has a very poorly written UI interface that's fucking infuriating. I was reverse engineering it to figure out why it's so damn slow on HDDs, with explorer.exe rendering like shit, the Start menu crawling, and taskbar popups that make you want to smash your screen. They wrote really really fucking bad code compared to the Win7 days—basically just took the old MFC crap and slapped a XAML wrapper on it to make it look "nice." What a fucking disaster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I read some article or saw some video claiming that explorer was basically a react app now, which is why unlocking the screen takes 3.5 business days when you enter the correct password.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Uh, what? Can you clarify what you mean by "drag&drop"? Because dragging and dropping files or text around within or between application windows definitely worked even when Win 11 was new, so you're probably talking about some specific instance, I assume?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The taskbar on windows 11 for the first two years didn't support dragging and dropping on icons or opened applications. It was completely unusable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    In every version of Windows up until now which has contained a taskbar and start menu, as far back as Windows 95. Not just Windows 10.

    Sadly not true. Microsoft removed the Start button in a version of Windows before. It was in Windows 8 (and Windows Server 2012 for some godforsaken reason) with the cursed "metro" interface. MS did it for the same stupid reason they're citing here "tablet and touchscreen users". The uproar caused MS to release Windows 8.1 a year later where they returned the Start button.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Windows 8 and metro were not so bad compared to what's happening now. They at least had a consistent picture in mind. I liked those things even if I wouldn't use them (moved firmly to Linux by then).

    My own humble opinion is that Windows in all its parts (perhaps except NT and basic layers) is as a project too much legacy. Simply existed too long with backwards support for various versions of involved libraries, with MS carrying the burden of maintaining old versions (while applications developers could package them similarly to how they package patched versions). Many tools to do the same thing.

    They should put all that on life support, installable separately, and make a clean set of libraries and tools that forms their new normal desktop installation. Preferably tabula rasa, no compromises.

    A file manager, a configuration manager, a set of desktop widgets. It'll take them much less effort and time to just write a new set of tools.

    A normal configuration manager supporting all that it should is the hardest thing. But it'll also be the killer feature, imagine one UI to configure everything in a Windows installation, it'd be as cool as YaST2 in OpenSUSE or drakconf. IIRC, their system configuration tools for Windows 98 were a bit more user-friendly than NT-inherited for 2000 and XP, and haven't (the old ones) improved much since then ; they can fix that.

    That means dropping backwards compatibility for such a clean installation - well, who wants to run old applications, will run them in, sigh, that installable compatibility environment (might be cut down somehow).

    I'm almost certain that'll be both cheaper and more popular among users than what they are doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Sadly not true. Microsoft removed the Start button in a version of Windows before

    They didn't say that every version of windows since then had a start button

    First of all they only talked about the start menu, which was still part of 8, even if it was annoying and full-screen. And second they only said that every Windows version that had that allowed you to move the taskbar around. Not that every Windows version so far had it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 95 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

    WHAT DATA?!

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

    Which is why if you dig deep enough into Settings you'll see WinXP Control Panel UI elements. You know, the elements that are actually useful for power users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    There's a format dialog from NT still present in win 11

    edit: it's from 1994 according to the person who wrote it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    The main one I use is the network adaptor settings, where you can enable/disable protocols and most importantly for me, where you can easily add multiple IP addresses on a network adaptor.

    The Win 8+ network settings page is an absolute trainwreck. I particularly like how it doesn't warn about conflicting IP addresses now and just silently accepts your given address and provides an auto-assigned 169.254 address instead if it sees even the smallest hint of another computer out there using the address you want to use.

    Guaranteed fun and confusion trying to access/ping things until you finally check the status of the network adaptor and discover the auto assigned address, thanks Microsoft.

    Not everyone wants to use dhcp, which is clearly their preferred direction, and there have been bugs where Cisco devices trigger that flip to auto assigned addresses even if things are fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Most of the old settings are at least easily reached if you can remember their names such as ncpa.cpl for the settings you mention but when you write "control printers" you get sent into the new Settings view now. Instead you gotta go to the control panel and change view from category to small or large icons to finally right click Devices and Printers and choose "open in a new window" to get there. If you left click it you get sent to the new Settings view.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    It seems that every new release adds another layer of indirection (misdirection?) between you and the useful stuff you need to access. I use a third party utility to manage IP settings, and it's one click from its menu to get to the network adapter page. It takes me about 5 minutes of angry clicking around in stock standard win11 before I get to the same place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    The data they have compiled from years of people using Win 10 and Msoft Edge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    If they were using that data, then they would have included features people actually use in 10. Or maybe they’re just doing the inverse of whatever the data suggests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Or maybe you're overestimating the amount of people who actually used that. Spending effort on something that less than maybe 1% of users actually use and that is not load bearing to any important workflows is hard to argue for when you're a corp that is only concerned about its own bottom line. It's a pretty rational business decision, even if you (and I) disagree with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    It's Microsoft, they have all the data. And quite frankly it doesn't surprise even a little bit, i doubt even 5% of people moved around the taskbar, people are just ready to hitch themselves to every bandwagon they see shitting on Microsoft.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    In that case, based on the roughly 1.5 billion Windows users, that’ll only affect a mere 75 million users for a feature that’s been there since Windows 95.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    The equation they are thinking of, though, is "will the cost of those who actually quit using Windows outweigh the cost of building and maintaining this feature." Funnily enough the inability to move the taskbar is what finally pushed me to Linux full-time, but the overwhelming majority will complain and stick to Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 67 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Microsoft’s data shows such users are really small when compared to the number of users who are asking for other newer features in the taskbar.

    Asking for things like AI integration everywhere?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    Wouldn't it be cool if you could have AI on the desktop clock so you could ask it what time it was in different places in the world?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I was going to make a joke that they could also replace the taskbar search bar with an AI chat bar, but after reading the article, it turns out that they're planning on doing that for real:

    Windows 11 taskbar is now being “upgraded” with AI-first features. Microsoft is working on the Ask Copilot bar, which may replace Windows Search in the taskbar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    This is madness. Madness? This is Wiiiiindoooows.

    Why the hell ...

    They could just make another application. With compact mode to have as a prompt in the corner of the screen, similar to DigiCam or Winamp or other such.

    They could even eventually deprecate tools allowing to do the same things it provides.

    I can even say that conversational user interfaces are not all idiocy - at some point I dreamed of them replacing all the bright buttons and icons we have.

    People making this are not idiots.

    But putting a conversational user interface everywhere people expect to have one prompt and a response, preferably with clear logic of that response, - it's just socially hostile behavior.

    There really is progress behind this! Or, more precisely, there is sanity, it's not all hype. Making a useful GUI requires learning something about ergonomics and human psychology and tests, most UI designers don't have a clue. And a conversational interface, like in old text quests or MUDs and with these AI chatbots, solves the problem. It doesn't require memorizing a thousand commands and interpreter syntax like a command shell.

    Unless you make a UI with downsides of both and upsides of neither. Takes Microsoft to do this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    They NEEED to pump the copilot usage numbers to appease shareholders. It doesn't matter if all copilot uses are accidental and unwilling, cause it'll look great in the next quaterly report

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Or you could have a widget just showing it for a few timezones. FvwmButtons, Exec exec date ... and Schedule Periodic ... in FVWM can do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    TLDR: We rewrote the taskbar and didn't bother implementing it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    What's weird is that given certain odd scenarios (I can't recall it but there was a video by Enderman about it) you'll see the old windows 10 taskbar appear, exact styling and all. So the windows 11 taskbar is quite literally just a WebView plastered on top.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 116 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    the reason is literally "because we decided not to implement it"

    Saved you a click.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 10 months ago

    “When you think about having the taskbar on the right or the left, all of a sudden the reflow and the work that all of the apps have to do to be able to have a wonderful experience in those environments is just huge.”

    This is such utter fucking nonsense. They already have to deal with the concept of a "client area" that encompasses variable-sized screens and (worse) the multiple-monitor situation. Movable task bar is trivial.

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    When you think about having the taskbar on the right or the left, all of a sudden the reflow and the work that all of the apps have to do to be able to have a wonderful experience in those environments is just huge

    It was working fine in windows 95. Suddenly all programmers became incompetent and can't handle something like that?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago*

    This makes no sense to me what so ever. Why do any apps care about where the taskbar is? How's it any different when a window isn't maximised and the user resizes it? Either I'm seriously misunderstanding this or it's a completely made up excuse.

    I'd rather they just say "we completely rewrote the taskbar, but we know that less than 0.01% of users move their taskbar so we didn't prioritize it".

    To me the bigger issue with the taskbar is that you can't make it compact. Instead it has to be a big chunky mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 49 points 10 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Linux is missing enterprise management tools. For all its horrible flaws, nothing like SCCM, In tune, group policy, and Active Directory (in the sense of managing group policy, not so much identity) exist for Linux. Fix that, even commercially, and you might see a real change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    There's plenty of enterprise management tools available - these tools all existed in the Linux world before their adoption to Windows.

    There's a bunch of different configuration management tools available:

    Or you could go for an MDM (Mobile Device Management) solution:

    These lists are not exhaustive.

    The same tools that manage data centers full of servers can also be used to manage user devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'm aware of these, but invariably when discussing with my intercompany peers it's a hard no. When a company completely ditches MS it literally makes the news. The cost vs complexity formula must not make sense (also user retraining and interoperability problems are not solved here either).

    I would love to break the stranglehold MS has on general corporate productivity computing but I also want to keep my job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Sorry, it didn't seem like you were aware of them from the post above. There are plenty of reasons to stay with Windows, Linux lacking enterprise management tools just isn't one of them.

    People don't generally care which OS they use as long as they can get their job done. We had one sub-division entirely on an immutable Linux desktop, another media unit was all-in on Apple products. As you say though, they're outliers - simple inertia will keep people with Windows for a long time to come, their dominant position ensures it.

    The cost vs complexity argument isn't a compelling one either - there's a reason so little of the internet runs on Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 47 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    The bit about apps having to reflow seems nonsensical. They have to reflow any time the user resizes their windows.

    I'm not accepting any excuses from MS about limited resources when Linux desktop environments built by hobbyists have the feature in question.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Yeah, sounds like bullshit. I don't even see why that particular concern would create more work on the OS's part.

    If an application fits "wonderfully" into the space it's given, Windows did nothing but telling it the dimensions it needs to fill. And as you said those dimensions can vary wildly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Plasma is everything I used to wish Windows' desktop could be, but isn't because of... honestly I have no idea what they're thinking over there. I am so glad I dumped that trainwreck. Love everything KDE <3

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Please, consider trying out linux if you haven't: you can usually make a "live usb" and take it for a test drive without having to actually reinstall (if you don't like it, just take the usb stick out and reboot back to windows).

    I would dearly love to never again have to hear about the latest bullshit Microsoft is foisting on people.

    Do your part! Switch. Everything just works better over here.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    A word of caution: If you use bitlocker (copy your keys!), it can have hooks in the TPM/bios settings.

    Disable bitlocker prior to attempting a live boot.

    It will lock your disk if you don't prepare for it.

    For reference:

    https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=9145

    https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=430251

    https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/bitlocker-and-tpm-blocks-the-hard-disk-after-booting-from-usb-and-pressing-try-ubuntu/57833/17

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    That’s quite an article to say they forgot about it after re-writing the task bar for no reason. It’s such a basic expected feature.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The amount of bullshit is incredible. The DE sets the windows position. The DE tells the apps what's the "usable" desktop area. It worked for decades. And now "you can't imagine the amount of work"

    Fuck you microsoft. Not that I care anymore. Even your excuses are pathetic.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    There was a while back some Windows developer externally lamenting how ass-backwards they were and as a result their NT kernel was woefully under-featured compared to other contemporary OSes...

    Then I think they forced him to take it back and say 'um actually our kernel is actually super awesome, my mistake'.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    I'd guess it's for the same reasons why we can't have a local account

    it’s safe to assume that the company isn’t interested in pouring its engineering resources into pursuing something that won’t benefit a majority of users

    I mean, they could just let their awesome Copilot vibe code it, couldn't they? Another reasons why I love being on Linux; you can do whatever even it it doesn't make sense to the majority of users.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    you can do whatever even it it doesn’t make sense to the majority of users.

    If they could do math, they'd know that you should fit every decision for all users you can think about, not the majority. Because the majority is different for every dimension, and if you choose a different strategy, your end result won't be usable for anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Apps then need to constantly reflow their layouts, resize content, adjust snapping behavior, and handle edge cases across different screen sizes, DPI settings, and multi-monitor setups. Also, this reflow logic has to work perfectly for legacy Win32 apps, modern UWP apps, and everything in between.

    You mean the apps that were already handling this for decades when windows wasn't a vibe-coded and ad-infested vehicle for AI slop?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Yeah this doesn't make sense. Docked bars have worked fine since Windows 95. You could have the task bar on any side, and apps would handle it. You could have multiple docked bars too, as some third-party apps used to be dockable. For example, Winamp had a view that was a short bar stretching the entire width of the screen, stuck to the top of the screen. The windowing system handled it with no issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 34 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    So, to cater to the maximum number of users at once, Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

    I call bullshit, because nobody uses the "modern" devices and printers interface in windows 10, because it fucking sucks. Everyone goes to the control panel instead. In windows 11, you have to use the "modern" interface, and it drives me crazy, especially because the old, fully functional, and reliable one is still in the OS, but Microsoft decided to hide it/make it a PITA to get to.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    They keep re-implementing things.

    Just the Start menu. You can see how 95 evolved into 98 evolved into ME, then they changed it for XP, and they never stopped making big pointless changes. In many cases, those big pointless changes have been lengthening the process of going from the bare desktop to the thing you need by adding pointless screens and dialogs. Or, like the Start menu, they just drastically redesigned it such that a user used to Win XP tries to use 7 and they just...stare at it because it's not what they were expecting. Windows 7's Start menu might even be objectively better, Microsoft's software engineers could very well produce good research documentation about UI design based on observing or polling users about what features they wanted and then they made the thing people seemed to want, but to people who got used to how it already worked the new thing was bad because it's different.

    I could be convinced Windows 8.1 is a mental unwellness simulator. In Sierra's FMV horror game Phantasmagoria 2, the player character goes insane at work, and this is simulated by the paperwork he's working on flashing scarier words for a split second. You're reading this document and then near the bottom of the page an ordinary word like "recommended" turns to "murdered" for a few frames. Win 8.1's animated tiles reminded me of that. Plus the whole "The desktop and all normal Windows apps therein is itself just an app that can be run in split screen next to special phone-like single tasking apps which pretty much only we will develop for and we won't include desktop versions of so you have to deal with this." I hate Windows 8.1.

    What's real fun is you can tell when they abandoned work on a project by which drastically different UI it's encrusted with. The modem dialer looks like Windows XP, the fax program looks like Vista, some things have the flat purple stank of 8, some things have the dark glass look of early 10.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    for power users? absolutely. but nobody who isn't tech savvy even knows what control panel is anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago

    "We specifically made the product worse, because that saves us money we don't need and gives us additional control over users' computers, since so many are locked into our ecosystem."

    Seriously, read the article. That's basically it!

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    So many people at work are having frustrating issues with Windows now.

    It takes so fucking long to start up. Sure, you get a desktop and can open a program, but it just keeps locking up repeatedly for a good 20 minutes while whatever bloatware is running in the background during startup.

    They cram OneDrive down your throat and it has constant issues.

    They put so much shit in your way, in the name of "productivity" it makes your actual productivity worse.

    FUCK COPILOT.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I thought it was just me, it's so fucking "bulky" and slow on my work computer. Specs are fine on the laptop, windows 11 is just trash even without bringing up what it's lacking and difficult to navigate.

    And I know my way around windows very well, I can do nearly all my tasks with just a keyboard, don't even need a mouse for the gui.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Oh man, I remember marveling at BeOS in the day and for a brief moment in time when SSDs first hit the scene you could have a credibly fast Windows boot.... Nowadays it's worse than ever despite super fast storage, fastest CPUs, and gobs of RAM...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    18 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    11 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post