Librewolf and Waterfox devs have both publicly said they wouldn't be inclluding the AI stuff. Waiting on Floorp and Zen devs to weigh in still.
post
Gonna be switching this weekend. It would be great to have a thread that helps all Librewolf newbies.
LibreWolf default settings are kind of annoying for someone who lives alone and no one else has physical access to their desktop. I don't need to be logged out of everything and have my history wiped every time.
I finally tried LibreWolf today and gave up after about an hour of getting annoyed that my less-secure preferences wouldn't stick and stay. I don't know, maybe I'm not the target audience, but was finally thinking of giving a Firefox fork a shot and it mostly just annoyed me because I am not necessarily looking for something so ultra secure that it's deleting all the history and shit every time the browser closes. I feel like having cookies persist isn't something I should have to allow on a site-by-site basis when I want to stay logged into like 30 different sites, including local sites on my LAN that I manage personally.
As far as I know, you need to uncheck 'Delete cookies and site data when LibreWolf is closed' or add the exceptions you need in 'about:preferences#privacy' to stay logged in
Yeah, it's literally one button and cookies remain.
Personally I've left that setting on, but click the one in the address bar on every site that I want to retain cookies. There aren't that many of those.
Also, turn on Firefox syncing and it's just like using regular Firefox, but without the nonsense.
Hmm. I was one of those who was interested in LibreWolf for long time. Just recently I had to give it a pass for different reason (but for comfort reason as you). Good to read experiences that talk about the "issues" too. I guess LibreWolf could be used for everything that does not require logging in into a website; in example random websites and websearch and so on. But then, maintaining and using two different browsers would be super annoying (for me).
There is also Waterfox, which got some update recently, with version number 6.6.6! I will look into this and how it compares to LibreWolf.
It's not an issue, it's an intended feature that you can literally disable with one click in the settings
I’ve used Librewolf for my main browser more than a year now and have had no problems with any logins or staying logged in. Strange.
I had similar sentiments when I first tried LibreWolf. I figured some of them out, and lived with others.
But I eventually went the Betterfox route. But, I also like the Mull Browser. It's hardened, but a bit more lax (and livable) than LibreWolf
I was so close to accept LibreWolf and finally make the switch from Firefox. But sadly LibreWolf does not support saving in Browser passwords. Its because of security concerns, I get it. But look, I want to save passwords in the browser. And sadly this killed LibreWolf for me.
How about using a password manager? I think KeePassXC is useful with its keyboard shortcuts.
Password managers
We suggest that you use a more robust solution than the built-in password manager available in the browser:
- Bitwarden: open source password manager that allows for synchronization across multiple devices.
- KeePassXC-Browser: official browser plugin for the open source password manager KeePassXC.
Recommended Addons – LibreWolf
https://librewolf.net/docs/addons/#password-managers
What root problem are you trying to solve that a password manager and browser extension doesn't fix?
In settings, turn on Firefox syncing, and boom! you have password saving.
I'm using Librewolf for everything except for what I need to be logged in. The reason is that Librewolf pretends to be in UTC timezone. This is for privacy reasons, but when I load my calendar I need to see it in my timezone. There are manuals of how to turn that off, but the changes I made following their own workaround (https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/#what-are-the-most-common-downsides-of-rfp-resist-fingerprinting) never changed that behavior.
So what I do is using Epiphany for tool sites I need to login and a correct timezone, and everything else I use Librewolf.
I switched to LibreWolf about six months ago -ish. I'm very happy with the browser. Happy to hear they won't be incorporating the AI BS.
Same - around when all the terms and conditions drama was happening with Firefox.
For me that was the breaking point. I want to use software I can trust to be on my side - software that I can update to the latest version without worrying about what awful anti-feature they might have slipped in, which I then have to go try and disable.
Firefox demonstrated they aren't that, but Librewolf gives you it. A clean browser with privacy-respecting defaults, no ads, no sponsored content, no studies, and uBlock installed out the box.
Very happy.
I switched to LibreWolf from Waterfox. Happy with my decision! Even more happy with this announcement!
It's a little unfortunate MacOS support isn't the best. However, I totally agree with their stance of not paying the Apple tax. I run Linux, but I can't totally recommend LibreWolf to my non-techie family cuz they're on MacOS...
On the other hand, LibreWolf was one of the reasons I moved my parents to Fedora Silverblue!
I currently use Waterfox, but have never tried LibreWolf. What made you swap?
I just switched to Waterfox today. I'm also curious about what the differences are.
In short: LibreWolf is for those who want a "locked-down" fortress out of the box, while Waterfox is for those who want a privacy-conscious browser that still feels like a normal, convenient daily driver.
Choose LibreWolf if: You want the highest level of privacy without having to manually edit config files, and you don’t mind occasionally "fixing" a broken website or re-logging into accounts.
Choose Waterfox if: You want a privacy-respecting browser that supports Firefox Sync, has an Android counterpart, and handles streaming sites/logins without any extra friction (it supports WideWine out of the box, which lets you stream DRM protected content (netflix, hulu, disney, etc).
Currently using waterfox on android. Would appreciate hearing how tradeoffs compare to desktop.
Yeah it's getting to the point where there's really just no point trying to protect your privacy any further on Mac or Windows. There's simply no point bothering with a privacy-respecting browser when the OS itself is increasingly spying on you. Either choose a free OS or live with the consequences, unfortunately. Those who aren't ready to make the switch are going to have to start becoming ready, or resign themselves to their fate until they are.
Woohoo! My partner is switching soon because Ecosia betrayed its user base. Eco warrior browser now uses AI search assistant.
What’s this about ecosia? I’ve been using the search for the last few months but haven’t heard any controversy.
It has moved its AI search assistant from a separate tab, and now gives frequent responses in the primary view just like Google, Brave and DuckDuckGo, but there's no visible option to disable it in either search or browser settings, aka it's now on by default. I've yet to check browser config flags but that shouldn't be necessary.
They are apparently trying to do AI as greenly as possible: https://blog.ecosia.org/ecosia-ai/
Reducing AI’s footprint isn’t enough — we’re here to make a positive impact. That’s why we generate more renewable energy than our AI features use, from 100% clean sources like solar and wind.
We’ve invested €18M in renewable energy projects — expanding solar parks and adding clean power to the grid. The energy we generate helps displace fossil fuels and accelerate the transition to renewable energy.
We use tools like the AI Energy Score and Ecologits to select efficient models and track their energy use — keeping our process transparent, and ourselves accountable.
https://support.ecosia.org/article/1006-ai-search#Model-training-and-adjustments-LOaKB
We use OpenAI’s GPT-4.1 mini because it strikes a strong balance between performance and efficiency. By choosing a smaller, mainstream model, we aim to deliver a high-quality experience while keeping our energy and water footprint low. We believe there is a need for greater transparency around AI’s environmental impact and continue to push for change across the tech industry.
Our AI Search is built using smaller, more efficient models less energy than larger ones, according to a recent study. We assessed the model’s impact using tools like EcoLogits, CodeCarbon or Hugging Face AI Energy Score. Additionally, we avoid energy-intensive functionalities like video generation or deep research.
We generate more clean energy from solar and wind than our AI features consume. The surplus goes into the electricity grid, helping to replace fossil fuels. While we can’t yet account for the emissions generated during the AI model’s training, using our AI Search features helps accelerate the energy transition towards renewables.
I'm glad to hear that!
I still want to just go to the information source myself instead of an extra middleman of AI and what it thinks its sources are. I emailed Ecosia asking for a config switch to get rid of the AI search option at the bottom of my search results. Not a priority/not planning on it (one of them). Valid, it is not like I'm a paying customer, but also I want to reward people not hopping on the AI train. But at least Ecosia is not being as awful about AI as I thought they were. Will be trying LibreWolf instead.
Ecosia allegedly also gets their search results from Bing, for whatever that's worth.
https://support.ecosia.org/article/579-search-results-providers
Didn't even take a minute to research
Proof that Ecosia isn't really about their 'eco' claims when they're getting their search results from the people who are actively killing the world right now instead of indexing stuff independently.
That's not proof. Proof would be if they weren't using their ad revenue to do what they claim to be doing.
If you think using US tech means you're evil, wait until you find out where your clothes come from, who works to make your food, who is exploited by the amazing cheap deals you profit off of, who profits from the products you buy.
Ecosia, just like you, doesn't exist in a vacuum with endless money. They have to make the changes within their means with the cards they are dealt. You're demanding Ecosia build a competitor to Bing and Google with no money and that they save the world at the same time. Do you demand the same of yourself or do you call yourself a traitor to humanity every time you look in the mirror?
I just downloaded it today and it's been pretty solid. Need to keep using it to see if anything pops up but I think I'm making the switch.
Been on Firefox for probably more than a decade now. And I have zero need for a Chromium browser.
I would use it if I could have bitwarden. Anyone know if Firefox extensions can be ported into librewolf?
All Firefox extensions work with Librewolf, Bitwarden included. It's still regular Firefox under the hood, just with different settings enabled by default, uBlock Origin out of the box, and some annoyances removed.
LibreWolf is based on Firefox, so all of Firefox add-ons work properly. Also, Bitwarden is even recommended by the developers.
Password managers
We suggest that you use a more robust solution than the built-in password manager available in the browser:
- Bitwarden: open source password manager that allows for synchronization across multiple devices.
- KeePassXC-Browser: official browser plugin for the open source password manager KeePassXC.
Recommended Addons – LibreWolf
https://librewolf.net/docs/addons/#password-managers
I hope they keep the offline translation. It's actually an OK use of LLMs with two caveats: I'm not sure how ethically they have been trained, and I don't trust the output for anything vaguely important.
People do get that ultimately Firefox is paying rent right? Like if firefox goes too far, the much smaller team behind Librewolf is very unlikely to be able to keep up.
Your point being? "Give up and submit"?
Point is, there are still actual workers behind your favourite apps who still have to pay bills and feed their family. We can't keep asking for cake and eat it. I don't agree with the gradual enshitiffication, but I understand. This is why I am in favour of public-funded internet and applications, in the same vein how other countries fund their TV services like BBC or France 24.
So what is your proposal for now then? We should continue using Firefox and donating to Mozilla? Dont use LibreWolf?
You could not use Firefox and move to a different alternative, but even devs in that alternative will start to demand to be paid more.
Nowhere is anybody complaining about Firefox devs wanting money. That is so far from the issue. Most of us would happily and willingly give Mozilla money if it went to making Firefox a thing we want. If Mozilla had a bounty on features, direct avenues to fund devs, asked for donations every quarter or every semester, called for hardware donations, asked the community how to improve and listened or had community members on the board, I doubt the majority would complain. Mozilla does none of that except maybe asking for donations.
Donations to Mozilla just go into a black box and then you find out its gone to community outreach, AI features, buying an ad company, paying the ex CEO 5 millions per year, firing Servo engineers, and a bunch more crap.
There are many reasons people don't donate to Mozilla. Unwillingness to pay devs is not one of them.
My point being that people are misinformed about how much of the important work is being done by who.
The bills have to be paid.
The underlying development exists because the developers at mozilla can put food on the table.
We can't ignore the fact that a project of Firefoxs scale cannot be held together by volunteer work and hopes and prayers.
If people cared as much as they said they did, they should be looking at how the public could buy Mozilla such that the enshitification stopped rather than pretending alternatives would be able to survive the wake of any of the giants they are downstream of sinking.
Web browsers really should have been publicly funded but we have what we have...
I was just looking where to donate to them. The chads aren't even accepting donations.
The wolf does not concern itself with AI
I'm assuming all these privacy forks are pretty much expected to be ai-free
How does it slip through?
I'm glad this got posted over here.
Two Firefox forks are saying the same thing, and, to be clear, they both are absolutely saying it. One is LibreWolf and the other is Waterfox.
If you're wondering what the difference is, Waterfox was made to be like a lighter version of Firefox, when Firefox started adding bloat that some people disagreed with. It's Firefox, but with fewer options (in this case that's a good thing!), and a different icon. LibreWolf is the privacy-focused Firefox fork. While Waterfox has some privacy options turned on, LibreWolf goes all out in hardening the browser. If you say "fuck AI," both of them would be a good place to turn. (You should already be on a browser like Firefox anyway, since Chrome and its forks are so hard against privacy and security.)
Firefox is still good enough for most people. I saw the AI feature and I quickly disabled it. There's more context to these quotes though; it's not the AI that Firefox has put into its app already; it's a comment Mozilla made about it evolving into an AI browser at some point in the future. So if you do stick with Firefox, you should have the names "Waterfox" and "LibreWolf" in the back of your mind. Or maybe go look them up! They're both free, so maybe try one or both alongside your existing browser and see if they are right for you.
(I still use Firefox, but if they get too much cosier with AI, I'm liking LibreWolf's approach.)
How did it "slip through"? Did it reach the stable channel or did people report it in the beta / dev channels?
This is new info for me. I didn't know LW even had a browser. Thank you for sharing!
But I'm good with Brave.
really? you went from edge or whatever to homophobic ai filtering shit browser? wow. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1404116417142065/posts/1821948735358829/ https://cryptobriefing.com/is-brave-really-decentralized/ they want to scrape: https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/13/brave_news_corp_content/ ...geez, if you use brave you can aswell listen to michael jackson songs while watching your fave leni riefenstahl movies

all 20 comments