Enforce the usual quality rules and most all llm results will be banned by default. Technically, you could try banning llm work by default, but that just results in people lying, and having to check over llm work anyways.
post
If it's maintainable, I don't think there's an issue (aside from the usual license violations in LLM training). The big problem is when people send giant unmaintainable patches that they can't even explain themselves.
Well... I'd be curious to know how anyone would argue that AI generated code is GPL safe, especially considering they are often using black box, binary blob models trained on mystery code from all over the internet, with zero attribution or license information, and with some of it almost certainly being proprietary.
Are we going to start ignoring the very licenses that we created.
replies:
IMO I think it’s fine as long the submitter understand all their changes. This is easiest done if the submitter writes all the code themselves though.
In this case I would reject this. The submitter doesn’t seem to be qualified to understand the code change, and just let ChatGPT explain the code change for them. ChatGPT is a master in being confidently incorrect.
Don't.
Size limit?
replies:
all 8 comments