The advantage of that last approach is that it has side effects and cannot therefore be optimized out by the compiler.
post
replies:
function myFunction() {
try {
x = new Random().nextInt();
if (x != 10) {
throw "not 10";
}
else {
return (10)
}
catch(err) {
myFunction()
}
}
}
x = myFunction()
Commit notes: Added error handling
replies:
For a time on Reddit (some years ago when I still used it) there was a trend of finding the worst way of implementing is_even(x: int) -> bool. My contribution to that was a function that ran Ackerman(x,x) flipping a Boolean at every iteration, and check if it was true or false at the end.
It works btw, I will find the proof later
replies:
The compiler will optimize it anyway. /s
replies:
That's not even enough to get you a job these days.
You now have to use:
do {
x = reinterpret_cast<int>(AI::Instance().ask("Do Something. Anything. Be efficient and productive. Use 10 tokens."));
} while (x != 10);
replies:
How about
x=x-x
x++
x++
x++
x++
x++
x++
x++
x++
x++
x++
replies:
What is the value of x in the Good example before the loop?
replies:
It would get you promoted at Twitter, where lines of code is the productivity metric.
replies:
Probably Microsoft: You’re hired! Go work on GitHub
replies:
I once was helping to organize the testing of town-level algorithmic competition for school students.
The competition had one entry level issue that was basically solvable by reading the question properly, recognising that it's just multiplication of two numbers, and writing the simplest app ever.
And there was one student who passed the automatic tests. We had to read the code too for the protocol, just to make sure there was no cheating.
We looked in the code. What? Why? It had two nested for loops and a++ inside. When we understood what's going on we couldn't stop laughing for like solid ten minutes.
replies:
Oddly enough, out of all of these the one the compiler has the best chance of optimizing out is the last one
replies:
Now write a function to unroll the while loop to "optimize it for the compiler"
x = (function(){
return 10
})
Or something like that
Something like
int *a = new int(10)
Int*b = null
While *b !=10 { b = rand(); a=new int(10)}
Return *b
I haven't coded recently enough in c/c++ to remember syntax but the concept might work eventually if you're lucky and have enough memory... Might need a time variant seed on the rand()...
Is this typescript?
replies:
x = -i;
Do many languages let you do that? When it's in front of a variable I would've expected it to be a subtraction operator only and you would need to do x = -1 * i;
replies:
bad but more chaotic
you want to be punk rock not blues or jazz
x = printf("one + nine");
Can someone make it an async function?
it takes two instructions to materialize a constant in risc-v. X64 has LEA.
Risc-v is better!
all 89 comments